Overview
Title
An Act To provide for certain improvements to the housing and workforce programs of Federal land management agencies, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 5125 is a bill that helps people working in national parks and forests find better homes by letting them build and manage these homes in more places. It also makes it easier for parks to work with other groups to make these homes nice and to hire local people for jobs.
Summary AI
S. 5125, titled the “Land Manager Housing and Workforce Improvement Act of 2024”, aims to enhance housing and workforce programs within federal land management agencies. The act broadens the authority of the National Park Service and Forest Service to provide workforce housing both within and outside park areas and allows for partnerships with public, private, and philanthropic organizations to improve housing options. It also facilitates the recruitment of local hires and extends noncompetitive rehire rights for seasonal workers. Additionally, it involves comprehensive assessments and oversight to address workforce housing needs and suggests improvements to existing management and policy structures.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Land Manager Housing and Workforce Improvement Act of 2024" aims to enhance the housing and workforce programs for federal land management agencies, namely the National Park Service, Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The bill intends to improve housing options for employees, support collaborations with public and private partners, and provide stronger support for both seasonal and permanent workers. It addresses these goals through provisions expanding authority for acquiring and managing land, leveraging partnerships, and altering hiring practices.
Summary of Significant Issues
One major issue is the provision granting the Secretary of the Interior authority to acquire and manage land outside of national park systems, allowing for potential overreach or mismanagement. Additionally, the bill permits the extension of permits for Forest Service workforce housing to 50 years, potentially restricting future adaptability. The legislation also lacks clarity in the roles of the "appropriate committees of Congress" and the definition of "covered agencies," which could lead to confusion in execution. Furthermore, the allowance for cooperative management agreements without strict cost management guidelines raises concerns about financial inefficiencies and accountability.
Another concern arises from the broadened definition of support to include "fairly valued services" in philanthropic contributions, which could complicate value assessments and transparency. Finally, the process for oversight on housing programs is notably lengthy, which may delay necessary reforms.
Impact on the Public Broadly
If enacted, this bill could lead to improved housing conditions and workforce support for thousands of employees working in the federal land management sector. Better housing facilities might enhance employee morale and decrease turnover, resulting in more efficient and effective management of national parks and federal lands. This can have a positive ripple effect on visitors’ experiences and the overall preservation of these national treasures. In addition, the expanded partnerships and cooperative agreements could foster innovation and resource sharing between governmental and non-governmental entities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Federal Employees: Employees within the covered agencies might benefit significantly from improved housing options and support structures, positively influencing their quality of life and work. However, the changes in hiring practices, particularly the relaxed competition requirements, might lead to concerns about equity and transparency in recruitment.
State, Tribal, and Local Governments: These stakeholders could find opportunities to engage in cooperative management agreements with federal agencies, which could lead to shared resources and funding. However, financial efficiency and accountability issues could arise without clear guidelines and oversight.
National Park Visitors: The general public visiting national parks may experience longer-term benefits from improved service and maintenance due to a more stable and satisfied workforce. However, they might be indirectly affected if financial mismanagement ensues due to relaxed competitive bidding or ambiguous housing valuations.
Local Communities: Neighboring communities could see economic impacts, both positive and negative. The potential increase in land acquisition by the federal government might spur local development or create tensions over land use. Additionally, the expanded duration of workforce housing permits might influence local community planning and resource allocation over extended periods.
Overall, while the bill has the potential to provide significant improvements in workforce housing and collaboration, the broad authority it grants to federal officials necessitates careful consideration of oversight and accountability to prevent potential mismanagement or inefficient resource allocation.
Issues
The section on authorizing the National Park Service to address workforce housing off-park (Section 102) grants the Secretary of the Interior significant control over land acquisition and use without usual congressional budgetary controls, which could raise concerns about potential overreach or mismanagement due to lack of oversight. This includes the ability to manage land outside System units and to retain proceeds from land disposals without further appropriation. (Section 102)
The amendment allowing the Forest Service permits for workforce housing and infrastructure to extend to 50 years could commit resources far into the future, potentially restricting flexibility to adapt to changing needs or policies. This could also impact land management practices and influence local communities surrounding the affected sites. (Section 105)
The lack of context regarding the role of the 'appropriate committees of Congress' and the term 'covered agencies' in Section 2 could lead to confusion regarding their roles and responsibilities within the scope of this Act, impacting legislative clarity and implementation. (Section 2)
The provision for cooperative management agreements lacks specific guidelines on oversight and cost management, which could lead to financial inefficiencies and inconsistency in managing cooperative management agreements with States, Tribes, and local governments. The Secretary's authority to retain and expend funds without further appropriation raises concerns about transparency and accountability. (Section 202)
The amendment broadening support definitions to include 'fairly valued services' (Section 203) for philanthropic support could introduce subjective interpretation issues, potentially complicating the assessment of contributions and risking inconsistent valuations, which may affect accountability and transparency.
In Section 301, the definition of what constitutes a 'qualified' and 'certified' individual is vague and could lead to inconsistent interpretations and potential challenges in recruitment processes for land management agencies. This could impact hiring practices and organizational effectiveness.
The process and timeframe for conducting oversight on the housing programming of land managers could be seen as too protracted, with up to 30 months allowed from enactment to implementation of administrative actions. This delay may hinder timely reforms in workforce housing, affecting land management agencies’ operational effectiveness and the employees’ welfare. (Section 402)
The amendment to reduce competitive bidding requirements for Forest Service site conveyances to as few as two bids could limit transparency and competition, possibly leading to questions of favoritism or reduced financial returns in the competitive sale of government assets. (Section 105)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Land Manager Housing and Workforce Improvement Act of 2024 aims to enhance workforce housing for land managers, particularly those within the National Park Service and Forest Service. It includes provisions for prioritizing housing improvements, expanding housing options, cooperating with public and private partners, and evaluating workforce housing needs and programs.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, important terms used in the Act are defined: The "appropriate committees of Congress" include specific committees from the Senate and the House of Representatives related to energy, agriculture, natural resources, and appropriations. The "covered agencies" refer to federal agencies like the National Park Service and the Forest Service. Finally, the "Secretary" specifies the Secretary of the Interior.
101. Prioritizing National Park Service workforce housing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes Title 54 of the United States Code to give more importance to housing for National Park Service field employees by specifically mentioning "quarters for field employees" and clarifying the punctuation in the text.
102. Authorizing the National Park Service to address workforce housing off-park Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The National Park Service is allowed to acquire up to 20 acres of land near park boundaries to build housing for its employees, without these lands being governed by the same laws as national parks. Additionally, the Secretary has the authority to manage this land, can issue permits and leases, and if the land is no longer needed, it can be sold, with proceeds going towards more employee housing.
103. Expanding National Park Service rental options Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 103 changes the law to allow the National Park Service to expand its options for providing housing for field employees, including building and operating new quarters, rather than just managing and repairing existing ones.
104. Leveraging National Park Service rental receipts for workforce housing programming Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The National Park Service is allowed to use funds from a special account for building and maintaining housing for their field employees.
105. Empowering the Forest Service to address workforce housing needs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill allows the Forest Service to extend permits for workforce housing to up to 50 years instead of 30. It also changes how the Forest Service can sell its administrative sites by requiring at least two competitive bids instead of just one.
201. Engaging partners to address National Park Service workforce housing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends United States Code to allow projects for housing field employees within the National Park Service. It also expands the partnership opportunities to include Tribal entities and individuals or organizations with philanthropic agreements, allowing them to fundraise or generate donations for the Service.
202. Encouraging public-private cooperative management Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines the ability of the Secretary to enter into cooperative management agreements with states, tribes, or local governments to enhance the management of federal park lands and adjacent non-federal park lands. These agreements allow the sharing of goods, services, employees, and office spaces, without transferring administrative responsibilities for federal parks.
101703. Cooperative management agreements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the Secretary to form cooperative management agreements with States, Indian Tribes, or local governments for managing park lands more effectively, without transferring administrative control. The Secretary can share or acquire services on a reimbursable basis, co-locate in facilities, and assign employees between the parties involved to facilitate better management.
203. Leveraging philanthropic support to address National Park Service workforce housing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 103501(c)(3) of title 54 in the United States Code allows the National Park Service to receive support for workforce housing through a mix of cash, services, and durable goods, instead of just funds and goods.
301. Supporting the land manager workforce Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary or the Secretary of Agriculture can directly hire qualified individuals for certain federal positions near National Parks or Forests without typical competitive processes, as long as these hires follow merit principles and public notice rules. This authority will end on September 30, 2030.
302. Supporting the seasonal National Park Service workforce Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that temporary seasonal employees of the National Park Service can be rehired without competition. The Secretary will define what a major part of the Park Service is, and having to work in the same area is not required. This rule ends on September 30, 2030.
401. Quantifying the workforce housing needs of land managers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture to assess and report on the housing needs of workers in certain federal agencies within 18 months. The report will include an analysis of agency-owned and leased housing, the employment status of the workers living there, and the state of local housing markets, including how vacation rentals affect housing affordability and supply.
402. Conducting oversight on the housing programming of land managers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Comptroller General of the United States to evaluate and report on how certain budget guidelines and agency practices affect housing for government workers, and to suggest improvements like better housing supply and commuting options. Within a year of this report, relevant agencies must start implementing the suggested improvements.
403. Justifying emergency spending Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends an existing U.S. law to include new requirements for reporting when emergency subsistence is provided to Department of Agriculture employees. It requires the Secretary of Agriculture to submit a report to Congress detailing the reasons, number of employees helped, cost, and duration of assistance, approved by the Office of Management and Budget, unless the emergency is due to a natural or man-made disaster.
5. Emergency subsistence for employees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines provisions for providing emergency subsistence, which likely includes aid or support, for employees through the Department.