Overview
Title
To amend the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Establishment Act to expand the boundary of the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park in the State of Vermont, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make a park in Vermont bigger by adding new areas where people can learn about and help protect nature. It also plans to create a special place at the park to teach people how to take care of our natural world better.
Summary AI
The bill S. 5114 proposes expanding the boundaries of the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park in Vermont, which will now include additional zones like the King Farm. It allows the park to acquire land through donation, purchase, transfer, or exchange, with newly acquired areas to be used for agriculture, conservation, and education. The legislation also updates maps used for the park's boundaries and establishes a National Park Service Stewardship Institute at the park to promote best practices and leadership in conservation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Establishment Act Amendments Act of 2024," seeks to amend the current establishment act of the national historical park located in Vermont. The primary focus of this bill is on expanding the boundaries of the park and promoting stewardship within its confines. Key amendments include updating boundary delineations, acquiring new land, and establishing the National Park Service Stewardship Institute within the park.
Significant Issues
Several critical issues emerge from the bill's provisions:
Land Acquisition and Boundary Expansion: The bill broadly authorizes land acquisition through various means, including donation and purchase. However, it lacks specific limitations or criteria, potentially opening the door to favoritism or misuse of this authority. Furthermore, while a map is referenced for boundary delineation, it is not readily accessible to the public, leading to transparency concerns.
Ambiguity in Language and Objectives: Certain provisions, such as those relating to the use of acquired land for "customary agricultural operations," are vague. The lack of clear guidelines could result in activities that do not align with the park’s educational or conservation goals.
Establishment of the Stewardship Institute: The creation of the National Park Service Stewardship Institute comes with broad objectives but lacks clarity in terms of funding sources and accountability measures. Without specified metrics for success, the effectiveness of this initiative could be questionable.
Potential Public Impact
Broadly speaking, the bill might have several implications for the public:
Environmental and Educational Benefits: By expanding the park's boundaries and establishing the Stewardship Institute, the bill aims to enhance conservation efforts, promote environmental stewardship, and provide educational opportunities. This might lead to increased public awareness and engagement in conservation activities.
Fiscal Concerns: The absence of detailed financial plans and explicit criteria for land acquisition could lead to increased public spending without guaranteed outcomes. This could potentially strain government resources or require reallocations from other public services.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The bill could have varying impacts on stakeholders, including local communities, environmentalists, and park visitors:
Local Communities: The changes may affect local residents, particularly those near the new boundaries or potential land acquisition areas. While there might be economic opportunities through conservation and education-related activities, there could also be concerns over land use and property rights.
Environmentalists and Conservationists: These groups might view the expansion and focus on stewardship positively, as it aligns with sustainability and conservation goals. However, they might be concerned about the vague language regarding land use and accountability, which could undermine ecological integrity.
National Park Visitors: Visitors might benefit from improved park services, enhanced educational programs, and expanded areas to explore. However, any issues arising from poorly defined land use regulations could impact their experience negatively.
In summary, while this bill brings promising changes to the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park, it requires careful consideration of its broader implications, potential costs, and the need for clear guidelines to ensure its goals are met effectively.
Issues
The lack of specific criteria or limitations on land acquisition methods in Section 3 could lead to potential abuse or favoritism in selecting donors or sellers. This issue is compounded by the vague language regarding the 'right of access,' which could result in disputes or complications with park operations.
Section 2 does not provide any cost estimates or financial implications of the boundary expansion, which could lead to unknown or wasteful spending. The criteria used by the Secretary to determine the division of King Farm between zones are not specified, raising concerns about potential ambiguities or favoritism.
The broad and undefined language regarding 'other agricultural operations customary in the State of Vermont' in Section 3 may allow for activities inconsistent with the park's conservation or educational goals. This raises concerns about oversight and the potential environmental impact on the park's ecosystem.
The change of map dates and the lack of specificity in boundary revisions in Section 4 could lead to difficulties in assessing the impact of these changes, including potential financial costs. This issue is significant as it could influence decisions affecting the park and surrounding areas.
Section 6 establishes the National Park Service Stewardship Institute without specifying a budget or funding source, raising concerns about the sustainable financial support of the program. The broad language regarding the Institute's purposes can lead to ambiguity about its specific activities and expected outcomes.
The absence of specific accountability measures or metrics for evaluating the success of programs under the National Park Service Stewardship Institute in Section 6 could lead to inefficiencies and a lack of transparency in achieving its stated goals. This raises questions about resource allocation and program effectiveness.
The title 'Short Title' does not convey any meaningful information about the Act's content or implications, leading to potential ambiguity. The lengthy name of the act complicates communication, and the lack of details about the amendments glosses over its objectives and impacts.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act can be officially called the “Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Establishment Act Amendments Act of 2024.”
2. Boundary expansion Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section revises the boundaries of the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park, as depicted on a specific map from August 2023. It includes a historic zone with the mansion and surrounding buildings, a protection zone with the Billings Farm and Museum, and the King Farm divided between these zones, with the map available for public viewing.
3. Acquisition of land Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Establishment Act allow the Secretary to acquire land for the park through various means, such as donation, purchase, or exchange, and specify that the King Farm land can be used for farming, conservation, and educational purposes while preserving its historic character.
4. Scenic zone Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 4 of the bill updates the description of a specific map related to the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park, changing the map's reference and date to a new version from August 2023.
5. National Park Service Stewardship Institute Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park Establishment Act establishes the National Park Service Stewardship Institute at the park, aimed at promoting stewardship practices, fostering innovation, and enhancing leadership in conservation and resource management. The Institute will conduct workshops, encourage research and dialogue, and facilitate partnership development and community engagement.
6. National Park Service Stewardship Institute Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text establishes the National Park Service Stewardship Institute at the park, which aims to promote stewardship through educational programs, innovation sharing, and enhancing leadership and community involvement in conservation. The Institute will be managed as part of the park's program.