Overview

Title

To counter efforts to recognize or normalize relations with any Government of Syria that is led by Bashar al-Assad, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Supporting Syrian Civilians Act is a plan that tries to stop countries from being friends with the leader of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, because he's been mean to people. It wants to help those who live in parts of Syria where Bashar isn’t in charge by giving them money and trying to stop bad guys from selling drugs there.

Summary AI

S. 5095, also known as the “Supporting Syrian Civilians Act” or “Caesar Act 2.0,” aims to prevent the United States and other countries from recognizing or normalizing relations with the government of Syria led by Bashar al-Assad due to ongoing crimes against Syrians. The bill proposes amendments to the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019 to extend its sanctions and other measures, reports on United Nations' manipulation by the Assad regime, and strategies to counter normalization attempts. It also includes humanitarian assistance, particularly for areas in Syria not under Assad's control, focuses on countering Captagon trafficking linked to the regime, and emphasizes efforts to recover hostages and remains of Americans.

Published

2024-09-18
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-09-18
Package ID: BILLS-118s5095is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
10
Words:
5,496
Pages:
27
Sentences:
68

Language

Nouns: 1,703
Verbs: 372
Adjectives: 253
Adverbs: 59
Numbers: 205
Entities: 445

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.27
Average Sentence Length:
80.82
Token Entropy:
5.34
Readability (ARI):
42.60

AnalysisAI

This proposed bill, titled the "Supporting Syrian Civilians Act" or colloquially the "Caesar Act 2.0," aims to reinforce measures against normalizing relations with the Syrian regime under Bashar al-Assad. The legislation intends to enhance sanctions, reinforce policy stances, and address various geopolitical and humanitarian issues related to Syria. It also introduces mechanisms for accountability, financial appropriations for humanitarian support, and countermechanisms against Syrian-linked narcotics trafficking.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill seeks to further isolate the Assad regime by revising existing sanctions and outline a broader strategic framework to prevent normalization of relations between Syria and other nations. It proposes adjustments to the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019, aims to strengthen policies opposing the recognition of the Assad government, and directs new interagency strategies. It also authorizes financial support for humanitarian causes in Syria and efforts to combat drug trafficking, specifically focussing on Captagon.

Significant Issues

The bill presents potential complexities, particularly evident in the intricacies of the legal amendments it introduces. These complexities could challenge those lacking specialized legal knowledge, given the bill's dense referencing of existing laws and amendments. An important concern is the bill's detailed regulatory environment, which could stifle effective implementation due to its intricate sanctions regime and reporting criteria. There is also a notable lack of explicit penalties for non-compliance with reporting requirements, potentially undermining accountability.

A considerable issue is the broad definition of financial dealings in Section 4, which might result in legitimate transactions being inadvertently included within the scope of sanctions, placing undue compliance challenges on international business operations.

Moreover, the requirement to submit partially classified reports may risk inadvertently disclosing sensitive information, which is essential for maintaining transparency and public confidence.

Impact on the Public

For the broader public, especially those with limited access to insider legal knowledge, the lack of readable coherence and potential misinterpretation of sanctions and legislative measures might result in misunderstandings about the legality and impact of international transactions affected by this legislation.

The general public might face indirect impacts, especially if increased sanctions lead to shifts in international relations, economic dynamics, or increased military engagements in the Middle East. The public might also see their government engage more aggressively on foreign policy fronts, dedicating resources to maintain compliance with the mandates set within the bill.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Syrian Civilians: Positively, the bill aims at directing funds and support towards humanitarian efforts, which, in theory, could improve conditions and provide necessary resources to areas affected by the Assad regime's control. However, the efficacy depends on efficient oversight and distribution of these funds.

Humanitarian Organizations: The earmarking of $10 million for the Syria Civil Defense may appear exclusionary, potentially raising concerns among other humanitarian groups seeking equitable support. This could lead to advocacy and operational challenges among organizations not included explicitly in the bill's provisions.

International Businesses and Governments: Entities engaging in or planning transactions with Syria might encounter increased regulatory compliance demands. Governments considering normalizing relations with Syria may face diplomatic pushback from the United States, altering existing or planned diplomatic strategies.

U.S. Government: The administration is required to engage actively in diplomatic efforts and provide substantial yearly reports. This requirement might strain resources and attention, drawing focus to enforcement and strategic international opposition to Syrian normalization efforts.

Overall, while the bill aims to address significant geopolitical challenges involving Syria, its intricate legal language, lack of detailed enforcement metrics, and potential inequities in funding allocations represent areas requiring careful consideration and likely amendment to ensure effective realization of its goals.

Financial Assessment

The Supporting Syrian Civilians Act, or Caesar Act 2.0, proposed in S. 5095, includes several financial allocations and appropriations aimed at supporting the United States' stance against the Assad regime in Syria. The bill outlines specific monetary strategies to back its objectives, particularly concerning humanitarian assistance, stabilization funding, and countering illegal activities relating to drug trafficking.

Economic Support and Humanitarian Assistance

The bill authorizes several financial appropriations under Section 7, focusing on humanitarian efforts in Syria. It earmarks $10,000,000 in Economic Support Funds exclusively for the Syria Civil Defense, commonly known as the "White Helmets," highlighting the U.S. commitment to providing humanitarian aid to areas of Syria not controlled by the Assad regime. However, this allocation could raise concerns about fairness and equity, as it appears to favor this particular organization over others also providing humanitarian aid. While the intention is to support regions outside Assad's influence directly, it might seem biased to channel funds predominantly to one organization, potentially overlooking other entities making significant contributions.

Additionally, the bill proposes $20,000,000 in Economic Support Funds dedicated to stabilization efforts in northwest Syria. This measure signifies an effort to maintain essential services and support in areas beyond Assad's control. The appropriation of $50,000,000 in Economic Support Funds is also proposed to aid Syrian refugees and their host communities in the Middle East and North Africa, reflecting a broader commitment to addressing the humanitarian crisis caused by prolonged conflict.

Countering Captagon Trafficking

To combat Captagon production and trafficking—a trade linked to the Assad regime and groups like Hezbollah—the bill proposes additional funding of $10,000,000 from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) account. This allocation is aimed at curtailing the drug trade, which is considered harmful not only to Syria but also to the broader Middle East and North Africa region. The Congress's proactive approach in fiscal allocation underscores the seriousness of the drug issue and frames it as not only a local but also a global concern.

Compliance Challenges and Reporting

In Section 4, the definition of "covered transaction" includes a wide range of monetary dealings, potentially leading to compliance challenges for entities engaging in legitimate transactions. The requirement for detailed annual reports and the inclusion of classified annexes, presenting data on these transactions, aim to enhance transparency but also raise the risk of inadvertently exposing sensitive information.

Overall, the financial provisions in S. 5095 are comprehensive and illustrate a targeted effort to address several issues arising from the ongoing Syrian conflict. It emphasizes humanitarian aid and strategic deterrence through economic sanctions and financial oversight, although there remain concerns regarding implementation fairness and the confidentiality of sensitive information.

Issues

  • The language of amendments and legal provisions in Section 2 might be too complex for the general public to understand, with multiple cross-references to other acts and sections requiring specialized legal knowledge for interpretation.

  • Section 6 does not specify any penalties or consequences if the briefing is not conducted within the specified 15-day period before a force posture change, which could undermine accountability and compliance.

  • The definition of 'covered transaction' in Section 4 includes a wide range of financial dealings, potentially encompassing numerous legitimate transactions and creating compliance challenges.

  • The requirement for an unclassified report, which may include classified annexes in Sections 4 and 5, presents a risk of sensitive information being inadvertently disclosed in the public domain.

  • Section 7's allocation of $10,000,000 in Economic Support Funds specifically to the Syria Civil Defense could appear to favor this particular organization over others providing humanitarian aid, raising concerns about fairness and equity.

  • The strategy outlined in Section 5 lacks details for a clear plan, potentially leading to ineffective measures against the manipulation of the United Nations by the Assad regime.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short titles; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act introduces its short titles, which are the "Supporting Syrian Civilians Act" and the "Caesar Act 2.0", and outlines the contents of the Act, including modifications to existing legislation, policy statements, strategies against normalization with the Assad regime, and various reports and briefings related to Syria.

2. Modifications to the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The modifications to the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act outline stricter sanctions against foreign entities engaging with the Syrian government and its affiliates in various activities, provide for annual reports on the Act's implementation, include exceptions for humanitarian aid and U.N. commitments, and determine sanctions eligibility for the Syria Trust for Development led by Asma Al-Assad. The sunset provision is extended to December 31, 2028.

7432. Exceptions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section outlines exceptions to sanctions, allowing for activities necessary for complying with international agreements like the United Nations headquarters agreement, authorized law enforcement, intelligence activities, and humanitarian assistance, including transactions involving food, medicine, and medical devices. Additionally, it defines terms like "agricultural commodity," "good," "medical device," and "medicine."

3. Statement of policy regarding the prohibition of recognition of the Assad regime Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The policy of the United States is to refuse recognition or normalization of any Syrian government led by Bashar al-Assad due to the regime's continued crimes against the Syrian people. The U.S. aims to discourage other countries from recognizing Assad's government, enforce sanctions, advance national interests such as counterterrorism and humanitarian aid, seek political solutions to the conflict, and ensure the release of hostages and recovery of deceased U.S. nationals' remains in Syria.

4. Interagency strategy to counter normalization with Assad regime Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In the bill section, the U.S. Congress outlines a strategy to counter countries normalizing relations with the Assad regime in Syria. It defines key terms, requires an annual report from the Secretary of State on foreign governments' ties with Assad and U.S. actions against them, and highlights the importance of international law, human rights, economic sanctions, and the national security implications of recognizing the Assad regime.

Money References

  • — (1) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for a period not to exceed 3 years, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that describes— (A) the steps taken or planned to be taken by foreign governments to normalize or upgrade political, diplomatic, or economic ties with the regime led by Bashar al-Assad in Syria (referred to in this Act as the “Assad regime”); and (B) the actions taken by the United States Government to counter such steps. (2) ELEMENTS.—The report submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include— (A) a description of— (i) violations of international law and human rights abuses committed by Bashar al-Assad, the Government of the Russian Federation, or the Government of Iran; and (ii) progress made towards achieving justice for the Syrian people and accountability for the violators; (B) a list, including the identification of— (i) any single covered transaction exceeding $2,500,000; and (ii) any combination of covered transactions by the same source within a 12-month period that exceed $2,500,000, in the aggregate; (C) for each identified single transaction or aggregate transactions, as the case may be, included in the list described in subparagraph (B), a determination of whether such transaction subjects any of the parties to the transaction to sanctions under the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019, as amended by section 2; (D) a description of the steps the United States is taking to actively deter recognition or normalization of relations by other governments with the Assad regime, including specific diplomatic engagements and the use of economic sanctions authorized by Federal statutes or implemented through Executive Orders, including— (i) the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 8791 note); (ii) the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act (22 U.S.C. 2151 note); (iii) the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (22 U.S.C. 8501 et seq.); (iv) Executive Order 13894 (84 Fed. Reg. 55851; relating to blocking property and suspending entry of certain persons contributing to the situation in Syria); (v) the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (22 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.); (vi) the Countering American Adversaries through Sanctions Act (22 U.S.C. 9401 et seq.); and (vii) the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (title VIII of Public Law 106–120; 21 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.); and (E) an assessment of how recognition of, or normalization of relations with, the Assad regime by other governments impacts— (i) the national security of the United States; (ii) the material benefits of such recognition or normalization to the Assad regime; (iii) the normalizing government prospects for the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2254; (iv) prospects for justice and accountability for war crimes in Syria; and (v) the benefits derived by the Government of the Russian Federation or the Government of Iran.

5. Reports on manipulation of United Nations by the Assad regime in Syria Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of State to submit an annual report to Congress for five years about how the Assad regime in Syria influences the United Nations. This report should include details on any conditions set by the regime, officials with ties to the regime, access restrictions, benefits to the regime, due diligence measures, affiliated entities receiving UN support, how exchange rates are manipulated, and strategies to reduce the regime's influence and ensure fair aid distribution.

6. Briefing before force posture change Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Before the United States decides to withdraw its military forces from any area of Syria, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State must give a joint briefing to specific Senate and House committees. This briefing, which should happen at least 15 days before the decision is made, will address the potential effects of the withdrawal.

7. Economic support funds for Syria Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes Congress's stance and policy on providing humanitarian aid to northwest Syria, urging support for Syrian refugees, and prohibiting their forced return. It also authorizes $10 million and $20 million in economic support funds for humanitarian and stabilization efforts in Syria, plus $50 million to help Syrian refugees and host communities in the Middle East and North Africa.

Money References

  • (a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the humanitarian situation in areas of northwest Syria that are not controlled by the Assad regime remains dire, which is due in large part to ongoing attacks, diversion of cross-line assistance, and corruption by the Assad regime; (2) Syrian refugees and their host communities— (A) are under significant strain due to the prolonged conflict in Syria; and (B) require significant assistance from the international community; (3) it remains unsafe for Syrian refugees to return to Syria absent a formal cessation of hostilities and significant implementation of the principles laid out in United Nations Security Council Resolution 2254 (2015); (4) the forced return of Syrian refugees to Syria absent their consent or the aforementioned conditions violates the principle of non-refoulement; and (5) host countries must not forcibly return refugees to Syria without their consent absent a formal cessation of hostilities and significant implementation of the principles laid out in United Nations Security Council Resolution 2254 (2015). (b) Statement of policy.—It is the policy of the United States— (1) to provide humanitarian funding to northwest Syria outside of mechanisms controlled by the Assad regime; (2) to maintain basic services for communities in northwest Syria outside of Assad regime control; (3) to oppose the refoulement or otherwise forcible return of Syrian refugees and provide significant assistance to Syrian refugees and their host communities; and (4) to work with partners and allies to support the efforts described in paragraph (1) through (3). (c) Authorization of appropriations for humanitarian assistance for northwest Syria.—There is authorized to be appropriated, in addition to amounts already appropriated for such purpose, $10,000,000 in Economic Support Funds for the Syria Civil Defense (commonly known as the “White Helmets”). (d) Report and strategy on stabilization funding for northwest Syria.
  • — (A) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appropriated $20,000,000 in Economic Support Funds for stabilization funding in areas of northwest Syria that are not under the control of the Assad Regime.
  • (B) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—None of the funds appropriated pursuant to subparagraph (A) may be expended until a senior official of the Department of State provides a briefing regarding such expenditure to— (i) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; (ii) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; (iii) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (iv) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. (2) FUNDS FOR SYRIAN REFUGEES AND HOST COMMUNITIES.—There is authorized to be appropriated $50,000,000 in Economic Support Funds to support Syrian refugees and host communities in the Middle East and North Africa. ---

8. Countering Captagon trafficking Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section discusses the requirement for the Secretary of State to submit annual reports to Congress for three years on the implementation of a strategy to combat Captagon trafficking, with specific details on funding and support for the strategy. It authorizes an additional $10,000,000 to help stop the production and trafficking of Captagon in the Middle East and North Africa, with a focus on activities linked to the Assad Regime and Hezbollah.

Money References

  • (b) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated, in addition to any funds already appropriated for such purpose, $10,000,000 from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) account to counter the production and trafficking of Captagon in the Middle East and North Africa, especially such trafficking carried out by the Assad Regime and Hezbollah.

9. Briefing on steps to free Austin Tice and repatriate American remains from Syria Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section discusses Congress's findings and its perspective that the U.S. government should take necessary actions to free Austin Tice and retrieve the remains of several Americans who died in Syria. It mandates that the President regularly brief Congress on the efforts to achieve these objectives and keep families informed.