Overview
Title
To impose an assessment related to fossil fuel emissions, to establish the Polluters Pay Climate Fund, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 is like a rule that says companies using fossil fuels (like oil and coal) have to pay money for the pollution they make. This money goes into a big pot to help protect the environment and help people who are most hurt by pollution.
Summary AI
The Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 aims to combat climate change by imposing a tax on fossil fuel companies based on their carbon dioxide emissions. The revenue collected will be used to establish the Polluters Pay Climate Fund, which will finance initiatives related to climate resilience, adaptation, and environmental justice. The bill emphasizes the importance of helping vulnerable communities and sets aside 40% of the funds specifically for investments benefiting these communities. It also ensures that the act doesn't interfere with existing state or federal laws related to climate change accountability.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024" is proposed legislation introduced in the 118th U.S. Congress. The bill aims to address climate change by imposing a financial assessment on fossil fuel companies based on their greenhouse gas emissions. It establishes a new tax targeting emissions from fossil fuel extraction and crude oil refining that occurred between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2022. The collected funds would be allocated to a newly established "Polluters Pay Climate Fund." This fund's purpose is to support projects that address climate change impacts, enhance resilience, and promote environmental justice, particularly in vulnerable communities.
Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is the ambiguity surrounding the funding mechanism for the extensive protective measures required to combat climate change. The bill highlights the vast financial needs but does not clearly define how these will be financed beyond the proposed tax on fossil fuel companies. Moreover, the complex tax formula may present compliance challenges for the companies involved, potentially increasing administrative costs.
The allocation of funds raised further concerns. Specifically, the bill requires that 40% of the funds be dedicated to environmental justice communities. While this demonstrates a commitment to addressing historical inequalities, it might limit the flexibility in addressing broader climate resilience needs.
The bill also presents potential legal ambiguities by specifying that the assessments imposed are not meant to be determinations of fault. This could complicate interpretations regarding liability and accountability, intersecting with existing legal frameworks.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill aims to enhance the nation's ability to respond to and withstand the effects of climate change. By channeling funds into climate resilience projects, it could help mitigate the impacts of extreme weather events, indirectly safeguarding livelihoods and property. However, the lack of clarity in how the broader financial requirements will be met raises questions about potential downstream effects, including how costs might be passed to consumers or taxpayers.
Impact on Stakeholders
Fossil Fuel Industry: Companies directly involved in fossil fuel extraction and refining will bear the immediate financial burden of the new tax. This could prompt the industry to increase prices for consumers or potentially reduce investments in other areas.
Vulnerable Communities: The bill's dedication of 40% of funds to environmental justice communities acknowledges and attempts to rectify historical inequities. These communities might benefit from targeted investments aimed at reducing their exposure to environmental risks.
Government Agencies: Agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency and FEMA are poised to receive substantial funding, which could bolster their capacity to implement climate resilience projects. However, they will face the challenge of effectively managing and coordinating these funds to ensure transparency and accountability.
Legal Entities and Practitioners: The legal profession may encounter increased demand for services as entities navigate the complexities of compliance and potential disputes arising from the bill’s provisions. The non-preemption clause preserves states' autonomy and various legal avenues, potentially leading to a complex legal landscape.
Overall, while the bill represents a bold step towards addressing climate change's challenges, it brings with it a suite of financial and legal complexities that could impact its effectiveness in achieving its intended goals.
Financial Assessment
The Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 introduces several critical financial aspects aimed at addressing the urgent issue of climate change by imposing taxes on fossil fuel companies. It also establishes a significant fund aimed at advancing climate resilience and justice.
Tax Imposition and Revenue Collection
The Act imposes a tax based on carbon dioxide emissions, requiring each fossil fuel company, or "assessable person," to contribute a sum proportional to their emissions. The overarching goal is to collect a total of $1 trillion, an amount that reflects the aggregate contribution of these companies toward the established Polluters Pay Climate Fund. This financial framework is critical, as it directly ties the taxable amount to the emissions of each company, thereby promoting accountability.
However, this approach raises several issues. The determination of "covered carbon dioxide emissions" could be complex, involving extensive calculations and potential ambiguities about which emissions are considered taxable. Moreover, taxpayers might face challenges understanding the tax's intricacies without expert assistance, potentially leading to increased compliance and administrative costs. Furthermore, there is a notable ethical and legal nuance here, with the bill asserting that these assessments are not a determination of fault. This could complicate interpretations regarding accountability for climate impacts.
Polluters Pay Climate Fund Allocation
The establishment of the Polluters Pay Climate Fund is a pivotal component of the bill. The fund is tasked with addressing climate resilience, adaptation, disaster response, and environmental justice. Notably, 40% of the funds must specifically benefit environmental justice communities—those historically burdened by climate and environmental injustices. The stipulated use of funds aims to prioritize vulnerable communities, aligning with broader federal efforts to ensure equitable climate action impacts.
This financial allocation strategy underscores some complexities. The earmarking for environmental justice, while well-intentioned, may introduce strict limitations on how the funds can be flexibly used to tackle other climate resilience challenges. Additionally, the Act lacks detailed accountability measures or performance metrics for fund allocation, which could raise concerns about transparency and efficiency in its implementation. There is also the risk of potential misuse of significant public funds due to unspecified criteria governing fund distribution.
Financial Appropriations and Future Investments
The findings section of the Act acknowledges a future requirement for trillions of dollars to implement necessary climate change measures. However, it does not provide detailed strategies on securing these funds. This omission leaves open questions regarding fiscal responsibility and how these extensive financial demands will be met beyond the initial revenue from fossil fuel taxes.
Legal and Regulatory Considerations
Finally, the Act includes provisions stating that it does not preempt existing laws or legal remedies related to climate change damages or deception by fossil fuel companies. This provision aims to ensure that other laws and potential legal actions remain viable avenues for addressing liabilities. However, the complex language present in the bill might obscure its implications and require expert legal interpretation.
In summary, while the Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 aims to secure significant financial resources for climate-related strategies, it introduces complex financial dynamics that necessitate careful consideration. These include potential challenges in tax compliance, allocation strictures for environmental justice, and the need for transparency and effective oversight in fund management.
Issues
The section on Findings (Section 2) highlights a significant financial concern: the bill does not specify how the required trillions of dollars for protective measures against climate impacts will be funded. This raises questions about fiscal responsibility and the sourcing of these funds, which is a critical issue for both taxpayers and policymakers.
Section 3 discusses the imposition of a complex tax on fossil fuel emissions, which may be difficult for taxpayers to understand without expert guidance. This complexity could increase compliance costs and administrative burdens, affecting the financial operations of businesses involved.
There is a potential ethical and legal ambiguity in Section 2 and Section 3 regarding the statement that assessments are not intended to be determinations of fault. This could intersect with legal interpretations of liability and harm, making it a contentious issue in the context of accountability for climate change impacts.
The definition and determination of 'covered carbon dioxide emissions' in Section 3 could lead to unintended inclusions or require further clarification due to its broad scope covering various fossil fuel-related activities.
Section 4, which establishes the Polluters Pay Climate Fund, contains ambiguities in fund allocation processes and a lack of specific accountability measures or performance metrics, raising concerns about transparency, efficiency, and potential misuse of significant public funds.
The bill mandates that 40% of the Polluters Pay Climate Fund be used for environmental justice communities (Section 4), which imposes strict allocation criteria and possibly limits flexibility in addressing broader climate change resilience and adaptation needs, potentially impacting fund effectiveness.
Section 5’s complex language regarding the availability of legal remedies and interactions with the Polluter Pays Climate Change Fund could obscure its implications for liability and legal actions related to climate change, necessitating expert interpretation.
The rapid regulatory timeline of 18 months for formulating regulations as stipulated in Section 3 could compromise the thorough development and vetting of necessary regulations, impacting the effectiveness and enforceability of the act.
In Section 9512, the lack of criteria for what constitutes a 'polluter' may lead to ambiguities in application, potentially affecting the fairness and transparency of the fund's administration and accountability mechanisms.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section gives the name of the law, which is called the "Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024".
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress acknowledges that climate change poses a significant threat to the U.S. and outlines the need for protective measures, emphasizing support for vulnerable communities. The section highlights the substantial financial burden of climate change, the responsibility of fossil fuel companies to contribute more to mitigation efforts, and the clarification that the Act's assessments are not intended to assign fault or affect accountability proceedings.
Money References
- Congress finds that— (1) climate change, resulting primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels, is an immediate, grave threat to the communities, environment, and economy of the United States; (2) severe consequences of climate change have already materialized in the United States, including rising sea levels, increasing temperatures, extreme weather events, flooding, heat waves, loss of biodiversity, and other climate change-driven ecosystem threats; (3) the Federal Government jointly with States and localities must develop and implement protective measures to counteract the adverse effects of climate change, protect communities, and build resilience to extreme weather; (4) the government response must include protections for communities that are most vulnerable to climate change impacts, especially communities of color, low-income communities, and Tribal and Indigenous communities that are also more likely to have experienced systemic disinvestment and be overburdened by fossil fuel pollution; (5) the protective measures necessary to respond to the adverse effects of climate change in the United States will require trillions of dollars of new investment during the decade after the date of enactment of this Act; (6) climate change related extreme weather events, such as those described in paragraph (2), cost the United States at least $150,000,000,000 each year and disproportionately affect underserved and overburdened communities, according to the Fifth National Climate Assessment; (7) the $100,000,000,000 each year that fossil fuel companies are collectively assessed for the Polluters Pay Climate Fund established in this Act represents only a small portion of the total cost to the Federal Government to respond to climate change related extreme weather events and make needed climate change adaptation and resilience investments; (8) peer-reviewed research can now determine with great accuracy the share of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere by the operations and products of specific fossil fuel companies, which is what informs the formulas to determine carbon dioxide emissions that are used in the amendments made by this Act; (9) the fossil fuel industry has been aware of the central role that their product plays in causing climate change since before the year 2000; (10) the fossil fuel industry must now increase their contribution to government expenditures to protect the Nation from climate disaster; and (11) this Act and assessments under the amendments made by this Act are not intended— (A) to be a determination of fault; or (B) to have any impact on the ability of any person or other government to hold polluters accountable for harms caused. ---
3. Tax relating to current stock of greenhouse gas emissions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a new tax on certain companies related to their carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. The tax amount is calculated based on each company's share of total emissions, and companies can choose to pay the tax in installments over several years.
Money References
- — “(1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to each assessable person, the tax under this section shall be equal to an amount that bears the same ratio to $1,000,000,000,000 as— “(A) the assessable person's applicable share of covered carbon dioxide emissions taken into account under this section, bears to “(B) the aggregate applicable shares of covered carbon dioxide emissions of all assessable persons taken into account under this section. “
4691. Imposition of tax Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each person responsible for more than 1 billion metric tons of carbon emissions in the U.S. must pay a tax calculated based on their share of emissions compared to the total emissions, and they can choose to pay this tax in installments over nine years. The tax covers emissions from fossil fuel extraction or crude oil refining from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2022, and the first payment is due by September 30, 2025.
Money References
- (1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to each assessable person, the tax under this section shall be equal to an amount that bears the same ratio to $1,000,000,000,000 as— (A) the assessable person's applicable share of covered carbon dioxide emissions taken into account under this section, bears to (B) the aggregate applicable shares of covered carbon dioxide emissions of all assessable persons taken into account under this section. (2) DETERMINATION OF APPLICABLE SHARE.
4. Polluter Pays Climate Change Fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Polluter Pays Climate Change Fund is a trust fund set up to handle money collected from taxes on polluters and use it for projects that address climate change impacts, like disaster recovery and climate resilience. A part of the fund is specifically reserved for helping communities that are most affected by environmental issues, with a focus on fairness and effectiveness in funding decisions.
Money References
- — (A) GENERAL PURPOSES.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator and the heads of other relevant agencies, shall use amounts in the Fund for the purposes of furthering a comprehensive and equitable Federal response to climate change impacts through investments in climate resilience, adaptation, disaster response, and environmental justice, including— (i) climate-related disaster recovery and mitigation support; (ii) climate change adaptation support through climate and disaster planning assistance, funding for climate-resilient infrastructure, and improved climate and extreme weather prediction capabilities; (iii) initiatives that increase the climate resilience of energy systems through energy efficiency, grid resilience, and distributed electricity generation initiatives; (iv) initiatives that increase the climate resilience of the food system through support for climate-resilient farming practices; (v) initiatives that increase the climate resilience of the transportation system through planning and climate change adaptation support; (vi) initiatives that increase the climate resilience of ecosystems through conservation, restoration, and wildfire management activities; (vii) support for climate-related public health initiatives, including efforts to address extreme heat; and (viii) initiatives that increase the climate resiliency of drinking water and stormwater infrastructure. (B) SPECIFIED USES.—In carrying out subparagraph (A) each fiscal year and to the greatest extent practicable, the Secretary shall use amounts in the Fund— (i) to provide funding of not less than $15,000,000,000 to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for response and resilience programs of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to address climate-related disasters, including hurricanes, flooding, extreme heat, and wildfires, of which not less than $3,000,000,000 shall be used to carry out the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program under section 203 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133); and (ii) to provide funding of not less than $6,000,000,000 for grants and technical assistance under section 138 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7438), subject to the condition that the Administrator may determine the appropriate amounts to be used for those grants and that technical assistance. (C) ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE SET ASIDE.—Of the amounts appropriated from the Fund each fiscal year, 40 percent shall be used for investments that benefit environmental justice communities. (D) SELECTION.—For the purpose of determining how to award amounts appropriated from the Fund in excess of the amounts required to be used under subparagraph (B), the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator and the heads of other relevant agencies, shall establish selection criteria, which shall give the highest priority to projects or other activities that are most impactful in achieving the purposes described in subparagraph (A), as determined by the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator and the heads of other relevant agencies.
9512. Polluters Pay Climate Fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes the "Polluters Pay Climate Fund" within the U.S. Treasury, which will consist of money allocated to it as specified in certain sections. It also states that funds will be available for specific purposes according to other legislative acts, funded by taxes collected as described in section 4691.
5. Availability of remedies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section clarifies that the Act does not exempt anyone from existing legal responsibilities and does not affect claims related to climate change under any laws. It also states that government funds from a specific climate fund cannot be used to influence such claims or to reduce any damages awarded in these cases.
6. Non-preemption of authorities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act does not override or replace any state or local laws or programs, particularly those dealing with greenhouse gas emissions, monitoring, climate adaptation, or investigations related to these issues.