Overview

Title

To modify the boundary of the Vicksburg National Military Park in the State of Mississippi, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

In this bill, the government wants to give two small pieces of land from a park in Mississippi to the state, so they can use it for helpful things like a museum or a welcoming place for visitors. This would mean changing the park's borders a little bit.

Summary AI

S. 4994 aims to change the boundary of the Vicksburg National Military Park in Mississippi. The Secretary of the Interior is directed to give two parcels of land, totaling about 10.14 acres, from the park to the State of Mississippi. These lands are intended to be used by the state for public purposes, such as a welcome center or museum. Once the transfer is complete, the boundaries of the park will be officially updated.

Published

2024-11-21
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-11-21
Package ID: BILLS-118s4994rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
452
Pages:
4
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 153
Verbs: 27
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 21
Entities: 40

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.24
Average Sentence Length:
41.09
Token Entropy:
4.51
Readability (ARI):
22.50

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, identified as S. 4994, aims to make changes to the boundaries of the Vicksburg National Military Park located in Mississippi. Presented by Senator Wicker and forwarded for consideration, the bill underscores facilitating federal land transfers to the State of Mississippi, specifically designed for public use. These transfers include approximately 10 acres of land for projects such as a welcome center or museum, thereby adjusting the park's boundaries thereafter.

General Summary of the Bill

The core objective of S. 4994 is to transfer portions of federal land within the Vicksburg National Military Park to the State of Mississippi. The financial aspect of this transfer is notable, as it is categorized as a non-compensated conveyance. After the land is transferred, the official boundaries of the park would be revised to exclude the conveyed parcels, which are earmarked for public utilities like interpretive centers or other similar projects.

Significant Issues

There are several key issues identified in the bill. Firstly, the transfer of land is to occur without financial compensation, which raises questions about potential federal revenue loss and the decision-making process behind such a conveyance. The rationale for gifting valuable real estate without financial return could be contentious, particularly given public finance scrutiny.

Additionally, the bill lacks specificity in terms of the conditions and guidelines for the conveyance process, placing considerable discretionary power in the hands of the Secretary of the Interior. This discretion without clear oversight mechanisms or parameters could result in concerns about transparency and accountability in federal asset management.

The language used to describe the proposed uses of the land is notably broad and vague. Terms like "or other public use" do not adequately guarantee that the land will be utilized in alignment with existing federal and state planning or public interest, leaving room for interpretations that may deviate from the intended or most beneficial use.

Moreover, the legislation references specific maps ("VICK–2024–01" and "VICK–2024–02") for delineating land parcels. However, it does not offer guidance on how these documents can be accessed by the public, which is a transparency issue. Without clear access to such maps, stakeholders lack the necessary tools to engage in informed dialogue and critique.

Potential Impacts on the Public

The impact of the bill on the public could be multifaceted. On the positive side, the development of welcome centers, museums, or interpretive centers on the newly conveyed state land could enhance tourism and educational opportunities, leading to economic benefits for local communities. However, by offering the land without compensation, the federal government foregoes potential revenue that could arguably benefit public finance.

Stakeholder Impacts

For the State of Mississippi and local stakeholders, the bill represents a considerable opportunity to expand infrastructure geared toward public engagement and education concerning historical sites. This could bolster tourism and local economic activity, fostering job creation and community development. However, the lack of specific guidelines might also lead to inconsistent application of resources and missed opportunities to optimize public benefit.

Conversely, some might argue that the absence of financial consideration represents a federal oversight, disadvantaging national stakeholders by reducing potential financial inflows from leased or sold valuable land. Additionally, vagueness regarding land use may lead to misaligned developments that do not align with local needs or cultural expectations.

In conclusion, the bill contains provisions that could greatly benefit local communities and project efforts for the state's advancement. Nevertheless, it would benefit from more detailed guidelines and accountability measures to ensure that the public advantage is maximized and potential federal interests, such as financial returns and oversight, are preserved.

Issues

  • The bill (Section 2) allows for the conveyance of Federal land to the State of Mississippi without financial consideration or compensation. This could be viewed as a loss of potential federal revenue and might raise concerns regarding the justification for giving away valuable land for free, especially considering public finance and accountability.

  • The terms and conditions under which the land is to be conveyed (Section 2) are left at the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior without specific guidelines or accountability measures. This lack of detail might lead to issues related to oversight and transparency, as there are no predefined parameters to ensure fair and appropriate use of discretion.

  • The intended uses of the conveyed land include broad and vague terms such as 'welcome center or other public use' and 'interpretive center or a museum or other public use' (Section 2). These ambiguous descriptions could lead to the risk of misuse or alternate interpretations that do not align with the original intent, raising concerns over the management and utilization of public lands.

  • The bill references specific maps ('VICK–2024–01' and 'VICK–2024–02') to describe the land parcels but does not provide information on how these maps can be accessed or verified by the public (Section 2). This lack of transparency can hinder public awareness and participation in the review process, potentially affecting informed public discourse and accountability.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title for the law, which is the "Vicksburg National Military Park Boundary Modification Act".

2. Vicksburg National Military Park conveyance and boundary modification Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of the Interior is required to transfer certain federal land at Vicksburg National Military Park to the State of Mississippi without any payment. This land will be used for public purposes like a welcome center or museum, and after the transfer, the park's boundaries will be adjusted accordingly.