Overview

Title

To award a Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the individuals who fought for or with the United States against the armed forces of Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater and the impacted Saskinax̂ people on Attu, whose lives, culture, and community were irrevocably changed from December 8, 1941, to August 15, 1945.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to give a special medal to the people who bravely helped the United States in fighting Japan during World War II and the Attu island people whose lives changed a lot because of the war. They will also make copies of these medals to sell, and the money will go to the U.S. Mint.

Summary AI

The bill S. 4988 proposes awarding a Congressional Gold Medal collectively to those who fought for or with the United States against Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater during World War II, as well as to the Saskinax̂ people from Attu whose lives were significantly impacted during this time. It recognizes the bravery and sacrifice of U.S. and Filipino troops in battles such as Bataan and Corregidor, and highlights the resilience of the Saskinax̂ who were taken prisoner. The bill also allows for duplicate bronze medals to be made and sold, with the proceeds benefiting the U.S. Mint.

Published

2024-08-01
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-08-01
Package ID: BILLS-118s4988is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
1,888
Pages:
9
Sentences:
58

Language

Nouns: 662
Verbs: 113
Adjectives: 76
Adverbs: 16
Numbers: 99
Entities: 248

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.21
Average Sentence Length:
32.55
Token Entropy:
5.26
Readability (ARI):
18.28

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Defenders of Bataan, Corregidor, and Attu Congressional Gold Medal Act," aims to collectively award a Congressional Gold Medal to individuals who fought for or with the United States against Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater during World War II. It also acknowledges the impacted Saskinax̂ people of Attu, whose lives were profoundly changed during this time. The bill seeks to recognize the courage and sacrifices of both military personnel and civilians involved in key battles and events from December 1941 to August 1945. The medal, once awarded, is to be housed at the National Museum of American History and may be shared with other significant historical sites.

Significant Issues

Several issues arise in the proposed legislation, indicating potential areas for clarification and improvement:

  1. Lack of Cost Specification: There is uncertainty about the financial implications of creating and awarding the gold medal. The bill does not outline the funding source for this endeavor, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending and adequate budget oversight.

  2. Unclear Criteria for Medal Recipients: The legislation does not specify the criteria or process for selecting the individuals who will receive the gold medal. This lack of transparency might lead to questions about fairness and favoritism in the selection process.

  3. Exclusion Clauses: The bill excludes members of the Pacific Fleet or the Hawaiian Department from being recognized as "individuals who fought for or with the United States." The rationale for this exclusion is not immediately clear and requires further explanation.

  4. Oversight Concerns with Duplicate Medals: The Secretary is authorized to strike and sell bronze duplicates of the gold medal without specified oversight or competitive bidding processes. This absence of regulatory measures could lead to inefficient spending or favoritism.

  5. Medal Funding Cap: There is no cap mentioned on the amounts that can be drawn from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund to cover the medal costs. This could potentially result in overspending.

  6. Ambiguous Geographic Terminology: The term "Pacific theater" is used in the bill but lacks a detailed geographic delineation, which might cause confusion regarding which areas are included under this designation.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill seeks to honor the bravery and sacrifices of individuals and groups involved in vital World War II battles and efforts against Imperial Japan. This recognition can promote a greater understanding of history and contribute to national pride. By highlighting these historical events and figures, the bill could inspire educational initiatives and commemorate significant past contributions to U.S. military efforts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For the veterans and surviving family members of those who served in the specified arenas, the awarding of the Congressional Gold Medal would provide official acknowledgment of their significant sacrifices and contributions. This could have a deeply personal and affirmative impact, offering a sense of closure, honor, and recognition.

For the impacted Saskinax̂ people, the acknowledgment through this legislation may serve as a long-overdue recognition of their historical suffering and resilience. Despite these positive potential impacts, the lack of clarity regarding selection criteria might inadvertently marginalize some deserving individuals or groups.

The public institutions, notably the Smithsonian Institution, could benefit through the enhanced prestige and increased visitor interest that such a historic and symbolic artifact might attract to its exhibits.

However, without careful attention to financial oversight and transparent processes, the bill's implementation could encounter public scrutiny over fiscal management. Stakeholders involved in financial oversight or historical conservation may call for more stringent controls and clearer definitions to avoid the appearance of governmental inefficiencies or preferential treatment.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify the cost or funding source for the creation and award of the gold medal (Sections 4 and 7), which could raise concerns about potential wasteful spending and financial oversight.

  • There is no mention of criteria or a process for selecting the individuals who will be awarded the gold medal (Section 4), which could raise questions about fairness, favoritism, and transparency in the selection process.

  • The exclusion clause in the definition of 'individuals who fought for or with the United States' (excludes members of the Pacific Fleet or the Hawaiian Department) might not be immediately clear in its purpose and could require additional context for justification (Section 3).

  • The section allows for the Secretary to strike and sell duplicates in bronze without providing any oversight or competitive bidding process (Section 5), which could lead to wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • The section does not specify a cap or limitation on the amounts that can be drawn from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund to cover the costs (Section 7), which could lead to overspending.

  • The term 'Pacific theater' might need a more detailed geographic delineation to avoid potential confusion about the areas included (Section 3).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that it can be referred to as the “Defenders of Bataan, Corregidor, and Attu Congressional Gold Medal Act.”

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress acknowledges the bravery and sacrifices made by United States and Filipino forces during World War II, highlighting events like the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Bataan Death March, and the battles in the Philippines and Attu, and urges recognition of the courage shown by those who fought in these challenging circumstances.

3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines terms used in the act, such as "impacted Saskinax̂ people," meaning indigenous people on certain Alaskan islands during World War II. It also explains "individuals who fought for or with the United States" in the Pacific, describing who qualifies and who doesn't, and defines areas like the "Pacific theater" and what constitutes "resistance or battle." The role of "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of the Treasury.

4. Congressional gold medal Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes the awarding of a Congressional gold medal to individuals who defended various locations in the Pacific during World War II, as well as the Saskinax̂ people who were affected. After being awarded, the medal will be housed at the National Museum of American History, where it may also be displayed at other significant locations related to World War II.

5. Duplicate medals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is allowed to make and sell bronze duplicates of a specific gold medal, as long as the sale price covers all costs associated with producing the medals, such as labor and materials.

6. Status of medals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Under this section, the medals created by the act are officially recognized as national medals and are considered collectible items according to U.S. financial regulations.

7. Authority to use fund amounts; proceeds of sale Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes the use of money from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund to cover the costs of making medals. It also states that any money made from selling duplicate bronze medals should be returned to this fund.