Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of Commerce to establish a grant program to foster enhanced coexistence between ocean users and North Atlantic right whales and other large cetacean species.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to create a program that gives money to help people and big whales, like the North Atlantic right whale, play safely together in the ocean. They plan to spend $10 million to make new tools and teach rules to protect these whales, but they must be careful not to spend too much on paperwork.
Summary AI
S. 4948 is a bill introduced in the United States Senate that requires the Secretary of Commerce to set up a grant program aimed at improving coexistence between ocean users and North Atlantic right whales, as well as other large whale species. Under this program, eligible entities such as government agencies, nonprofits, and research institutions can apply for funding to support activities like researching and developing technology to prevent harmful interactions, enhancing awareness of wildlife management rules, and building infrastructure to safeguard these whales. The program gives priority to projects likely to reduce injuries to whales and may provide economic benefits to small businesses in maritime-related sectors. The bill also sets aside $10 million for this initiative and specifies that a small portion can be used for administrative purposes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, introduced in the 118th Congress, primarily seeks to establish a grant program under the Secretary of Commerce. The intention is to support efforts to improve coexistence between ocean users, such as those in the shipping and fishing industries, and significant marine species like the North Atlantic right whales and other large cetaceans. The bill also stipulates a moratorium on modifications to existing regulations aimed at reducing vessel strikes on North Atlantic right whales until December 31, 2030. This measure is designed to help ensure the continued protection of these critically endangered species by preventing regulatory changes that might weaken current protections.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the principal issues with the bill is the restriction imposed on altering the existing regulations that aim to reduce vessel strikes on North Atlantic right whales. This prohibition could limit the flexibility needed to respond to evolving scientific data or changing environmental circumstances, which might undermine conservation efforts.
Another concern revolves around the administrative costs allowed under the grant program, which could consume a significant portion of the allocated funds—up to 5 percent or $80,000, whichever is greater. This may lead to excessive administrative spending, potentially diverting resources away from the primary program objectives.
The language used in the bill is complex, making it difficult for a general audience to comprehend certain provisions. This includes referencing external laws and codes, which might confuse those not familiar with legal or tax terminology. Additionally, the bill allows for the possibility of distributing resources to international partnerships, which raises concerns about whether U.S. interests are being adequately prioritized.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the public stands to benefit from the enhanced protection of marine ecosystems and endangered species, which can improve environmental health and biodiversity—a crucial factor for sustainable resources and ecological balance.
However, due to the rigid restriction on updating whale protection regulations, there's a risk of the policies becoming outdated and not reflecting the latest scientific insights. This could potentially compromise the effectiveness of conservation efforts, which in turns affects the public's trust in regulatory processes.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For environmental groups and marine conservationists, the bill offers a positive step toward securing more structured funding to support efforts in protecting North Atlantic right whales and large cetaceans. However, they may express concern over the rigidity of regulatory amendments, limiting adaptation to new research advancements.
Small businesses reliant on maritime industries might view the bill's grant programs favorably, especially if they can demonstrate cooperation among ocean users and potential economic benefits these projects provide. Nonetheless, the administrative cost allowances could be viewed as unnecessarily high, reducing the direct financial support available to applicants.
International partners might perceive the inclusion of internationally collaborative projects as beneficial, potentially fostering broader cooperation in marine conservation efforts. However, this aspect could also lead to apprehension among U.S. stakeholders about how effectively the funds benefit domestic interests.
In sum, while the bill presents several beneficial opportunities to bolster marine conservation, it also introduces challenges that need careful consideration to ensure that its objectives are met effectively and equitably.
Financial Assessment
The bill S. 4948 introduced in the United States Senate involves the establishment of a grant program designed to promote coexistence between ocean users and certain large whale species, including the North Atlantic right whale. This commentary focuses on how money is referenced throughout the bill, specifically in relation to its appropriations and financial allocations.
Summary of Financial Allocations
The bill authorizes an appropriation of $10 million to the Secretary of Commerce to implement the grant program aimed at reducing lethal and sub-lethal interactions between ocean users and large whales. This funding will remain available until fully expended, offering flexibility in its deployment over time. Of this amount, a portion is allowed to cover administrative expenses incurred by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (the Foundation), which is tasked with managing and administering the program. Specifically, the Foundation may utilize up to 5 percent or $80,000—whichever is higher—of the appropriated amounts each fiscal year for such expenses.
Relating Financial Allocations to Identified Issues
One of the concerns raised in the issues section relates to the provision allowing for up to 5 percent or $80,000 of the allocated funds to be used for administrative expenses. There is a potential risk that this allowance might lead to excessive administrative costs, particularly if the total appropriated funds are relatively low in comparison to the program's scope. This could divert essential resources away from the primary intent of the grant program, which is to facilitate safer interactions between ocean users and large cetaceans.
Furthermore, there is a provision within the bill that allows for funds to be potentially distributed to non-U.S. entities if they are in partnership with a U.S. entity. While this could encourage international collaboration, it might also raise concerns about whether the funds are being used to directly benefit U.S. interests, especially given the ambiguity around the definition of "United States person."
Additionally, the bill includes a broad clause that permits the Foundation, in consultation with the Secretary, to determine "other uses" for the funds. This flexibility might lead to concerns over financial accountability and whether the funds are being used for purposes strictly aligned with the bill's initial goals. Such open-ended financial provisions could cause apprehension regarding the proper oversight of the allocated resources.
Overall, while the financial provisions in the bill aim to support necessary conservation efforts, there are important considerations regarding the efficiency and focus of the financial allocations. Ensuring funds are spent effectively on strategies that benefit both the protected species and relevant economic sectors will be essential for the program's success.
Issues
The restriction on amending, updating, modifying, or replacing the North Atlantic right whale vessel strike reduction rule until December 31, 2030 (Section 1) may limit the government's ability to respond to new information or changing circumstances, potentially impacting the protection efforts for North Atlantic right whales.
The absence of a process for evaluating the effectiveness of the restriction on regulation modification over time in Section 1 could lead to a lack of oversight or accountability, contributing to potential inefficacy in protecting North Atlantic right whales.
The provision in Section 2 allowing for the allocation of up to 5 percent or $80,000 (whichever is greater) for administrative expenses may lead to excessive administrative costs if the appropriated amounts are relatively low, potentially diverting funds away from the primary objectives of the grant program.
The lack of clarity on the definition of 'United States person' by referring to the Internal Revenue Code in Section 2 could cause ambiguity and confusion, especially among stakeholders not familiar with tax codes.
The broad allowance for 'other uses' as determined by the Foundation in consultation with the Secretary and relevant eligible entities in Section 2 could lead to funds being used for purposes not initially intended by the program, raising concerns over financial accountability.
The complexity of language and legal references in Section 2 might make it difficult for all readers to understand, potentially creating barriers for grant applicants in navigating the application process.
The provision allowing potential distribution of resources to partnerships involving non-U.S. individuals or entities in Section 2 might lead to concerns about funds not directly benefiting U.S. interests.
There is no mention of the reasoning behind the restriction of modifications to the North Atlantic right whale vessel strike reduction rule, which could make the policy seem arbitrary or unjustified (Section 1).
The potential impact of the regulation restriction on various stakeholders, including environmental groups and local economies, is not indicated in Section 1, which could result in unforeseen negative consequences.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. North Atlantic right whales and regulations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
For the period from the enactment of this Act to December 31, 2030, the rule about reducing vessel strikes on North Atlantic right whales, found in section 224.105 of title 50 in the Code of Federal Regulations as it was in 2022, must stay the same and cannot be changed or replaced.
2. North Atlantic right whale and other large cetacean species grant program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill establishes a grant program to fund efforts to prevent harmful interactions between ocean users and North Atlantic right whales and other large cetaceans. The program prioritizes projects that promote cooperation among ocean users and provide economic benefits to small businesses, with grants available to various eligible entities, including government, nonprofit organizations, and specific partnerships, emphasizing funding research, awareness, and innovative strategies.
Money References
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available until expended.
- (2) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Each fiscal year, of the amounts made available to carry out this section under paragraph (1), the Foundation may use not more than 5 percent or $80,000, whichever is greater, of such amounts for the administrative expenses of the Program.