Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve and enhance the work opportunity tax credit, to encourage longer-service employment, and to modernize the credit to make it more effective as a hiring incentive for targeted workers, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 492 is a bill that aims to give businesses more money back when they hire certain people who might have a harder time finding jobs, like veterans, by changing how much of their wages the businesses can count for tax breaks, hoping this will encourage more companies to hire these workers.
Summary AI
The bill S. 492 seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code to improve the work opportunity tax credit. It aims to increase the percentage of first-year wages covered by this credit from 40% to 50% for most employees and includes higher wage limits for qualified veterans. Additionally, it removes the age limit for those receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits and extends credit provisions for long-term family assistance recipients. The changes would take effect for those employed after December 31, 2024.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, entitled the "Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 regarding the work opportunity tax credit (WOTC). Primarily, the bill aims to enhance the credit as a hiring incentive for targeted workers, encouraging longer-term employment. Significant changes include increasing the percentage of first-year wages eligible for the credit and adjusting wage limits, particularly for veterans. Additionally, it modifies rules concerning summer youth workers and long-term family assistance recipients, and it removes the age limit for qualified individuals under the supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits. These amendments apply to individuals who begin work after December 31, 2024.
Significant Issues
One key issue is the increase from 40% to 50% in the tax credit rate for first-year wages. While potentially beneficial for employers, this change could lead to reduced federal tax revenues without a clear understanding of the economic impact. Furthermore, the differentiation in wage limits for veterans could raise concerns over preferential treatment, as it may appear inequitable compared to other groups. Another issue arises from the removal of the age limit for those receiving supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits. This modification expands eligibility but lacks an explicit explanation of potentially hidden costs and motivations. Additionally, the bill reduces the credit for some summer youth workers, possibly discouraging employers from hiring those individuals. Lastly, the complexity of the bill's language and amendments could be a barrier for understanding and compliance.
Public Impact
Broadly, the bill is designed to incentivize employment among targeted worker groups, potentially increasing job opportunities and supporting economic growth. Employers may benefit from enhanced tax credits, easing the financial burden of hiring and retaining employees. However, the bill's fiscal implications might challenge federal revenue, leading to concerns about fiscal responsibility.
The removal of the age limit for supplemental nutrition assistance recipients could provide lifelines for older individuals, granting them access to benefits and enhancing employability. However, it may also place additional demands on program funding. Conversely, the reduction in credits for certain summer youth workers may result in fewer job opportunities for these individuals.
Stakeholder Impact
Employers would be primary beneficiaries, especially those hiring veterans or long-term family assistance recipients due to increased credit percentages. However, they might face challenges interpreting the new rules because of the bill's complexity.
Veterans stand to gain significantly from raised wage limits, which acknowledge their unique service contributions. Nonetheless, there could be perceptions of inequity compared to other employee groups.
Individuals on supplemental nutrition assistance will enjoy expanded eligibility, which can improve their financial and employment situations. However, this may lead to increased program costs without clear budget allocations outlined.
Youth workers are a demographic that may face negative implications due to reduced hiring incentives for some, which could decrease job availability in their age group.
In conclusion, while the bill provides promising enhancements to the work opportunity tax credit, fostering employment growth, its economic and equity implications warrant careful consideration to ensure a balanced and transparent impact.
Financial Assessment
The bill S. 492 proposes changes to the work opportunity tax credit under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, with notable financial implications that merit careful consideration.
Summary of Financial References
The legislation's primary financial initiative involves increasing the tax credit for wages paid to qualifying employees. Specifically, the bill increases the credit from 40% to 50% of first-year wages for most employees. For instance, this means employers could receive a credit of up to $3,000 on $6,000 worth of wages per employee, with the potential to extend to $6,000 on $12,000 of wages for employees who work more than 400 hours.
In addition, there's a significant financial component related to veterans. Veterans' qualified wages, for credit purposes, have increased thresholds. Regular employees' limits of $6,000 and $12,000 are increased to $12,000 and $24,000, $14,000 and $28,000, or $24,000 and $48,000 depending on the specific veteran category.
Financial Implications and Issues
- Impact on Federal Revenues
The increase from 40% to 50% in the credit amount is poised to reduce taxes owed by employers who qualify for the work opportunity credit. This reduction could potentially lower federal tax revenues. Such a decrement requires an examination of the overall economic activity that the enhanced hiring incentives might generate, as the principal goal of such credits is to stimulate employment among targeted groups. However, without clear evidence supporting substantial employment growth, the loss in revenue may not be justified in terms of fiscal responsibility.
- Differential Treatment for Veterans
The differentiated wage limits for veterans, which significantly increase financial eligibility for credits, while recognizing their service, might be seen as offering preferential treatment over other target groups. This could impact perceptions of equity and fairness in the tax code, as well as affect funding allocated to veteran employment programs without clear assessment criteria.
- Removal of Age Limits for SNAP Recipients
Extending tax credit eligibility by removing the age limit for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program beneficiaries widens the applicability of the credit. However, the financial implications for the federal budget lack clarity. The expansion of eligibility may lead to increased credit claims, affecting fiscal allocations for SNAP and other supportive programs without detailed cost analysis.
- Reduced Credit for Summer Youth Employees
The bill reduces the credit to 25% for certain summer youth employees, which may discourage hiring among this group, potentially affecting youth employment rates. This reduction may lead to inconsistencies and a less homogeneous labor incentive landscape, which might not align with broader employment goals.
- Complexity of Legislation
The numerous amendments and cross-references within the bill's text create a complexity that could impede understanding and compliance among employers. This complexity may result in underutilization of the credit, influencing its effectiveness as an incentive.
In summary, while the bill seeks to enhance the work opportunity tax credit, the financial adjustments proposed may have nuanced implications on federal revenues, equity among different worker groups, and employer engagement with the incentive. Each aspect requires ongoing evaluation to ensure that the intended economic and social benefits outweigh the fiscal impacts.
Issues
The increase from 40% to 50% in the tax credit rate as stated in Section 51(a) could potentially lead to increased tax credits, thus reducing federal tax revenues without a clear understanding of the broader economic impact, which could raise concerns about fiscal responsibility. (Section 2(a))
The differentiation in wage limits for veterans as per Section 51(b)(3) could be seen as preferential treatment. Although it might be justified by their service, this differentiation requires clear justification, as it might impact other demographic groups negatively or appear as inequitable treatment. (Section 2(b))
The removal of the age limit for qualified supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits recipients lacks transparency concerning its motivation and expected outcomes. The change might also affect federal budget allocations or the program's financial sustainability, as it extends eligibility to a broader group without clear cost assessments. (Section 3)
The reduction of the tax credit for individuals described in subsection (i)(3)(A) to 25% under Section 51(d)(7)(B), in the case of summer youth employees, could discourage employers from hiring certain individuals, leading to inconsistent treatment among new hires. (Section 2(d))
The amendment language is notably complex, involving multiple conforming amendments that necessitate careful cross-referencing with subsections and clauses. This complexity could hinder understanding and compliance by employers, potentially discouraging utilization of the credit. (General issue across Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act is officially titled the "Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act".
2. Improving and enhancing work opportunity tax credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes changes to the work opportunity tax credit by increasing the percentage of first-year wages that are eligible for the credit from 40% to 50% and raising the wage limits for certain categories of employees, like veterans. It also modifies the rules for summer youth employees and long-term family assistance recipients, altering how much of their wages count towards the credit. These changes would be effective for employees starting work after December 31, 2024.
Money References
- In general.—Section 51(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) by striking “shall be equal to 40 percent” and all that follows and inserting the following: “shall be equal to the sum of— “(1) 50 percent of so much of the qualified first-year wages with respect to each individual for such year as does not exceed $6,000, plus “(2) in the case of individuals who have performed at least 400 hours of service for the employer, 50 percent of so much of the qualified first-year wages with respect to each such individual for such year as exceeds $6,000, and does not exceed $12,000.”. (b) Conforming amendments relating to limitation on wages taken into account for certain veterans.—Section 51(b)(3) of such Code is amended to read as follows: “(3) INCREASED LIMITATION ON WAGES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR VETERANS.—The $6,000 and $12,000 amounts under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) shall be increased to— “(A) $12,000 and $24,000, respectively, in the case of any individual who is a qualified veteran by reason of subsection (d)(3)(A)(ii)(I), “(B) $14,000 and $28,000, respectively, in the case of any individual who is a qualified veteran by reason of subsection (d)(3)(A)(iv), and “(C) $24,000 and $48,000, respectively, in the case of any individual who is a qualified veteran by reason of subsection (d)(3)(A)(ii)(II).”. (c) Conforming amendments relating to individuals not meeting minimum employment periods.— (1) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 51(i)(3) of such Code are each amended by striking “subsection (a)” and inserting “subsection (a)(1)”. (2) Section 51(i)(3)(A) of such Code is amended by striking “40 percent” and inserting “50 percent”.
- (d) Conforming amendments relating to treatment of summer youth employees.—Section 51(d)(7)(B) of such Code is amended— (1) by striking clause (ii), (2) by striking “, and” at the end of clause (i) and inserting a period, (3) by redesignating clause (i) (as so amended) as clause (v), and (4) by inserting before such clause (v) (as so redesignated) the following new clauses: “(i) in lieu of the amount determined under subsection (a), the amount of the work opportunity credit determined under this section for the taxable year shall be equal to 40 percent of the qualified first-year wages for such year, “(ii) in the case of an individual described in subsection (i)(3)(A), clause (i) shall be applied by substituting ‘25 percent’ for ‘40 percent’, “(iii) in the case of an individual described in subsection (i)(3)(B), no wages shall be taken into account under clause (i), “(iv) the amount of qualified first-year wages which may be taken into account with respect to such individual shall not exceed $3,000 per year, and”. (e) Conforming amendments relating to long-Term family assistance recipients.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(e)(1) of such Code is amended by striking “family assistance recipient—” and all that follows and inserting the following: “family assistance recipient, in lieu of subsection (a), the amount of the work opportunity credit determined under this section for the taxable year shall be equal to— “(1) 40 percent of so much of the qualified first-year wages with respect to such individual for such year as does not exceed $10,000, and “(2) 50 percent of so much of the qualified second-year wages with respect to such individual for such year as does not exceed $10,000.”.
3. Removal of age limit for qualified supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits recipient Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill removes the age limit of 40 for individuals who qualify for supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits, allowing them to receive benefits regardless of age if they start working for an employer after December 31, 2024.