Overview

Title

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to molecularly targeted pediatric cancer investigations, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill aims to make it easier and quicker for kids with cancer to get special medicine by making new rules for testing these medicines. It wants to ensure that companies follow these rules and ask people about their opinions to make sure they work well for everyone.

Summary AI

The bill, known as the "Innovation in Pediatric Drugs Act of 2024," aims to update the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve the investigation of drugs targeting pediatric cancer. It proposes changes to ensure timely completion of pediatric study requirements and outlines penalties for non-compliance, particularly for orphan drugs granted special status due to rare conditions. The bill also mandates the FDA to enhance transparency in its compliance reporting and encourages funding for pediatric research. Additionally, it calls for public input and a study to assess the impacts of these changes on rare disease drug development.

Published

2024-07-31
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-07-31
Package ID: BILLS-118s4905is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
5
Words:
2,469
Pages:
12
Sentences:
40

Language

Nouns: 676
Verbs: 161
Adjectives: 122
Adverbs: 20
Numbers: 150
Entities: 101

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.09
Average Sentence Length:
61.73
Token Entropy:
5.03
Readability (ARI):
32.10

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the "Innovation in Pediatric Drugs Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. This bill focuses on enhancing the requirements and procedures concerning pediatric cancer investigations, particularly targeting pharmaceutical and biological drugs meant for pediatric use. Its intent is to ensure that there are comprehensive studies and assessments of these drugs specifically concerning children's health and safety.

General Summary

The bill introduced by Mr. Reed and Mrs. Capito addresses several key areas within the broad topic of pediatric drug study and assessment. It amends existing laws to tighten compliance requirements for companies engaging in pediatric medical research. The provisions cover areas such as enforcing study deadlines, granting penalties for noncompliance, and introducing funding allocations towards pediatric research. The bill also extends applicability to orphan drugs, which are typically developed for rare conditions, stipulating that they, too, should undergo detailed pediatric assessments if they offer meaningful therapeutic benefits.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the most significant issues with the bill concerns the potential for ambiguous enforcement due to the lack of clear definitions and criteria, especially when determining "lack of due diligence" in meeting pediatric study requirements. Additionally, the stipulated 45-day response period to address noncompliance may prove challenging, particularly for smaller, less-resourced entities.

The funding allocation for pediatric research, notably being set at "up to 1%" of available institute budgets, lacks specific clarity on the exact financial sums involved, which could lead to uncertainty and limited impact. The bill also reveals potential transparency concerns around stakeholder input during public meetings, as it does not provide detailed mechanisms for integrating this feedback into final guidance.

Potential Public Impact

Broadly, the bill could benefit public health by pushing for more rigorous pediatric testing of newly developed drugs. This focus on pediatric research helps ensure that drugs are safe and specifically tailored for children's health needs, potentially leading to better health outcomes across pediatric demographics. For the general population, the promise of enhanced safety and efficacy in pediatric medications could translate into increased confidence in the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory bodies.

Stakeholder Impact

For the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, particularly those focusing on orphan drugs for rare diseases, there's a potential mix of positive and negative impacts. On one hand, additional regulations can ensure better market products, potentially boosting market credibility. On the other hand, meeting these additional requirements could increase costs and delay product releases. Smaller companies might feel these impacts more acutely due to limited resources.

Regulatory bodies, such as the FDA, might face increased administrative burdens and resource allocation challenges as they implement new monitoring and enforcement strategies. However, these changes may also equip them with better tools and processes to ensure public safety regarding pediatric drugs.

The bill's discrepancies in clarity and vague language could lead to inconsistent enforcement and regulatory interpretation, creating legal uncertainties and needing potential future amendments or clarifications. For patient groups and healthcare providers advocating for pediatric health improvements, this bill represents a positive step, though it demands consistency in its application and follow-through to be effective.

Overall, while the bill aims to improve public safety and drug efficacy concerning pediatrics, its effectiveness will heavily rely on clear procedural guidelines, respectful timelines, and the equitable engagement of affected stakeholders.

Issues

  • The lack of specific criteria or process for determining 'lack of due diligence' in Section 2 could lead to ambiguous enforcement and potential disputes over compliance. This affects both the fairness and effectiveness of enforcing pediatric study requirements and might be perceived as biased or arbitrary.

  • The 45-day period for responding to a noncompliance letter in Section 2 is potentially insufficient for organizations, especially smaller entities, to prepare an adequate response. This could disadvantage smaller companies and raise ethical concerns about fairness and equal treatment under the law.

  • The bill does not specify the total funding amount available for pediatric research in Section 4, which can lead to uncertainty about the financial resources being committed to this critical area. This lack of clarity may affect trust and transparency in governmental resource allocation.

  • Section 5 lacks clear guidelines on how public input from meetings will be incorporated into final guidance. This could undermine the effectiveness of public consultations and raise ethical issues about stakeholder engagement in shaping policies impacting pediatric studies of orphan drugs.

  • The term 'real-world evidence' in Section 5 lacks specificity, which could lead to inconsistent standards across applications. This issue raises both legal and ethical concerns about consistency, fairness, and scientific integrity in drug approval processes.

  • The absence of detailed methodologies for collecting and assessing input from patient groups and medical providers in the 'GAO study' portion of Section 5 may result in biased or inconsistent results. This could affect the credibility and informativeness of the study on the Act's impact.

  • The bill’s Section 3 outlines penalties and compliance measures but lacks detailed guidelines on monitoring and enforcement, potentially leading to ambiguity and inconsistent application of law, impacting public trust and legal consistency.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Innovation in Pediatric Drugs Act of 2024 is the official short title that can be used to refer to this legislative act.

2. Ensuring completion of pediatric study requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to create stricter rules for companies that fail to complete required pediatric studies for drugs and biological products. It introduces a process where the Secretary must send a noncompliance letter and give the company a chance to explain before taking enforcement actions, unless the product is no longer marketed or if the failures occur within 180 days of the Act's enactment.

3. FDA report on PREA enforcement Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 508(b) of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act requires more detailed FDA reporting on the enforcement of the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA). It calls for an evaluation of compliance with deadlines and adds a requirement for listing penalties or settlements for non-compliance, including the drug names, their sponsors, and the amounts involved.

4. Program for pediatric studies of drugs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 409I(d) of the Public Health Service Act has been updated to allow the Director of the NIH to use up to 1% of the funds allocated for pediatric research from national research institutes and centers for the years 2025, 2026, and 2027.

5. Pediatric studies of orphan drugs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section discussed applies pediatric research requirements to drugs for rare diseases, known as orphan drugs. It outlines how guidance will be issued, public meetings held, and automatic waivers granted, ensuring the development of drugs for rare diseases includes considerations for pediatric patients while balancing the challenges of research in this field.