Overview

Title

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to Mesa County, Colorado, certain Federal land in the State of Colorado, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants the government to sell a piece of land in Colorado to a place called Mesa County, but it must be sold at the right price, and some things about how this will work need to be clearer.

Summary AI

The bill S. 4850 proposes that the Secretary of the Interior should transfer a piece of federal land, known as the Clifton parcel, to Mesa County, Colorado. This parcel is roughly 31.1 acres in size and the transfer must meet certain conditions, such as being sold for at least its fair market value, determined by an independent appraisal. The Mesa County must cover any survey costs needed for this process, while other transaction expenses will be handled by the Secretary. The proceeds from this land sale will be added to a federal account used for land-related expenses.

Published

2024-07-30
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-07-30
Package ID: BILLS-118s4850is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
744
Pages:
4
Sentences:
16

Language

Nouns: 221
Verbs: 40
Adjectives: 29
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 34
Entities: 55

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.07
Average Sentence Length:
46.50
Token Entropy:
4.70
Readability (ARI):
24.26

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The "Clifton Opportunities Now for Vibrant Economic Yields Act," or the "CONVEY Act," is a legislative proposal introduced in the United States Senate. The bill aims to transfer a specific piece of federal land, known as the "Clifton parcel," approximately 31.1 acres in size, from federal ownership to Mesa County, Colorado. This transfer requires a sale at fair market value, determined by an independent appraisal. The Secretary of the Interior is tasked with overseeing this process, and certain procedural steps and cost divisions are outlined to facilitate the conveyance.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues within the bill merit attention. Firstly, while the bill mandates an independent appraisal to establish the property's fair market value, it does not specify criteria or qualifications for selecting the appraiser. This omission can potentially lead to concerns about the impartiality of the appraisal process.

Secondly, there's a provision allowing for the correction of minor errors in the legal documents through mutual agreement between the Secretary of the Interior and Mesa County. However, what constitutes a "minor error" is not defined, leaving room for differing interpretations or disputes.

Additionally, the bill designates that proceeds from the sale are to be deposited into a Federal Land Disposal Account and used in accordance with an existing Act. However, it lacks detailed guidance on the specific use of these funds, which might lead to ambiguity or mismanagement concerns.

Furthermore, the divvying up of conveyance-related costs between the federal government and Mesa County lacks clear-cut distinctions, possibly leading to disagreements over financial obligations.

Lastly, the reliance on an external map and legal description not included within the text can pose accessibility issues, as stakeholders are dependent on additional documents to fully grasp the transaction's implications.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the conveyance of federal land to local jurisdictions like Mesa County can stimulate economic development and community planning, particularly if the land serves public or economic purposes once in county hands. The formulation of the bill, if executed transparently and efficiently, holds potential benefits for local communities by transferring control of resources closer to home.

However, concerns about the appraisal process's transparency and the ambiguous financial arrangements could lead to public skepticism regarding the fairness of the transaction. Ensuring that conveyance proceeds are applied in ways that reflect public interest could enhance trust in such federal land dealings.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Mesa County, acquiring the land could open up opportunities for economic expansion, infrastructure development, or public projects aligned with local priorities. Conversely, potential financial ambiguities regarding costs might pose budgetary challenges unless clearly delineated in the conveyance agreement.

For the federal government, the sale of land at fair market value provides an infusion of funds that can be managed through the designated federal accounts. However, a lack of explicit allocation details for these funds may lead to critique from stakeholders concerned with fiscal responsibility and accountability.

State and local residents could benefit from improved land usage and increased economic activity at the county level. Yet, if the process lacks transparency or favorable financial management, there may be adverse perceptions of fairness and efficiency in public resource handling.

In summary, while the CONVEY Act could provide positive changes to Mesa County's landscape and economy, addressing the aforementioned uncertainties and ambiguities will be crucial to ensuring its successful implementation and acceptance.

Issues

  • The lack of criteria for selecting the independent appraiser in Section 2(d) raises concerns about potential bias or lack of impartiality in the appraisal process, which could affect the fair market value determination for the Clifton parcel.

  • The provision in Section 2(g) allowing the Secretary and Mesa County to mutually correct minor errors lacks a clear definition or limitation on what constitutes a 'minor error', which could result in disputes or unintended misuse of this provision.

  • The language in Section 2(f) regarding the use of proceeds from the conveyance lacks specificity beyond being 'available for expenditure' under an existing Act, which might leave room for financial ambiguity or misallocation of funds.

  • The division of costs in Section 2(e) is potentially ambiguous, as it leaves room for interpretation regarding what constitutes 'costs associated with the conveyance', potentially leading to disputes over financial responsibilities.

  • Relying on an external map and legal description in Section 2(b) without including them in the text adds a layer of complexity for readers attempting to understand the full implications, possibly hindering transparency and accountability.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that this Act can be referred to as the “Clifton Opportunities Now for Vibrant Economic Yields Act” or simply the “CONVEY Act.”

2. Conveyance of Federal land to Mesa County, Colorado Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the process for transferring a piece of federal land known as the "Clifton parcel" to Mesa County, Colorado, requiring the land to be sold at fair market value determined by an independent appraisal. The transaction involves certain cost responsibilities between the Secretary of the Interior and the county, and provisions for depositing proceeds into a federal account, with the map and legal description of the land being finalized and made publicly available.