Overview

Title

To prohibit certain telework employees from receiving certain annual adjustments to pay schedules, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill says that some government workers who work from home a lot might not get pay raises. However, it doesn’t apply to people who need to work from home for health reasons or other special jobs, like law enforcement.

Summary AI

S. 4834, titled the “Federal Employee Return to Work Act,” aims to prevent certain teleworking federal employees from receiving annual pay adjustments and locality-based pay increases. The bill specifically defines "covered employees" as those who telework at least one day a week or 20% of their workweek under an alternative schedule, excluding employees like disabled individuals with accommodations, Foreign Service members, federal law enforcement officers, and active-duty military members. Covered employees will be paid based on the "Rest of U.S." locality pay rate, and the bill stipulates that these pay rates remain unadjusted for specific locality-based increases. The Act is set to take effect at the beginning of the first fiscal year following its enactment.

Published

2024-07-30
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-07-30
Package ID: BILLS-118s4834is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
5
Words:
509
Pages:
3
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 156
Verbs: 30
Adjectives: 31
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 25
Entities: 42

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.87
Average Sentence Length:
36.36
Token Entropy:
4.75
Readability (ARI):
18.20

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Federal Employee Return to Work Act," seeks to limit certain teleworking federal employees from receiving regular annual pay adjustment benefits. Specifically, it designates which employees fall under this category—those who telework at least one day a week, with some exceptions like federal law enforcement officers and active military members. The bill stipulates that these "covered employees" will not receive annual pay adjustments and will have their pay determined according to the "Rest of U.S." locality pay area. The bill aims to take effect at the start of the first full fiscal year following its enactment.

Summary of Significant Issues

One major concern is the ambiguity in the definition of a "covered employee." It both includes and excludes employees who telework at least one day a week, depending on various conditions, which might lead to confusion and misinterpretation. Additionally, the bill does not provide a clear rationale or justification for why certain teleworking federal employees are restricted from receiving pay adjustments. This absence of explanation could contribute to perceptions of unfairness. The term "Rest of U.S." used in the pay locality context is also not explicitly defined, which could result in inconsistent pay determinations.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill's impact may not directly affect the public at large, but it could indirectly influence government operations. If teleworking personnel are dissatisfied due to perceived unfairness in pay adjustments, this might lead to decreased efficiency in federal services. Additionally, there could be increased demand for clarification on who qualifies as a covered employee, which may require more resources to resolve.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Federal Employees: For teleworking federal employees, particularly those deemed "covered," the bill restricts access to annual pay adjustments, which might negatively affect morale and job satisfaction. These employees could feel penalized for teleworking, potentially pushing them to return to offices or seek employment elsewhere.

Government Agencies: The agencies might face challenges in maintaining morale and productivity, particularly if there's perceived inequity among employees. Agencies may also need to undertake additional bureaucratic evaluations to determine who precisely falls within the "covered employee" category.

Lawmakers and Policy Enforcers: These stakeholders could find themselves entangled in debates concerning fairness and equity. The vague definitions and the lack of rationale might result in legal challenges or demands for legislative amendments to clarify the bill's stance and objectives.

Overall, while the bill appears to target budgetary efficiencies by limiting pay increments for teleworking employees, several ambiguities and lack of justifications mean it might encounter significant challenges both legally and in application.

Issues

  • The definition of 'covered employee' in Section 2 is potentially confusing and could lead to ambiguity since it includes employees teleworking 'not fewer than 1 day a week' but also excludes the same under certain conditions. This duality in definition could be legally and operationally problematic.

  • Section 3's restriction on annual pay adjustments for 'covered employees' without explaining the rationale or implications raises fairness concerns. This could impact workforce morale and retention, and may be seen as an unfair cost-cutting measure by affected employees.

  • Section 4 specifies that covered employees shall be paid at the 'Rest of U.S.' locality rate, but this term is not clearly defined in the text, leading to potential discrepancies and confusion regarding pay scales.

  • The bill lacks a clear rationale or justification for why certain teleworking employees should be excluded from receiving annual pay adjustments (Sections 3 and 4). This absence of context could contribute to perceptions of unfairness and result in potential legal challenges or political debate.

  • The cross-references to other laws and regulations in defining terms, such as in Section 2 for 'covered employee', might make it difficult for those unfamiliar with these references to fully understand the implications, creating accessibility issues for the general public.

  • The lack of information on the benefits or implications of being classified as a 'covered employee' versus a 'non-covered employee' (Section 2) leaves unclear how these definitions align with the bill's stated purpose, potentially diminishing the transparency and interpretability of the legislation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In Section 1 of the "Federal Employee Return to Work Act," it is stated that the law can be referred to by this short title.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines key terms used in the Act, including "covered employee", which refers to someone who teleworks at least one day a week, except for certain groups like law enforcement officers or members of the Armed Forces. It also clarifies that "employee" and "telework" have meanings based on specific sections of the United States Code.

3. Annual adjustments to pay schedules Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Covered employees are not allowed to receive their usual annual pay adjustments as outlined in a specific U.S. law.

4. Pay localities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Employees covered by this section will receive a basic pay rate based on their grade and step in the "Rest of U.S." locality pay area from when they become covered. This pay rate will not change according to adjustments under section 5304 of title 5, United States Code.

5. Effective date Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The effective date of this Act is scheduled for the beginning of the first full fiscal year after it is enacted.