Overview
Title
To strengthen the authority of the United States Secret Service to investigate various crimes related to digital asset transactions and to counter transnational cyber criminal activity, including unlicensed money transmitting businesses, structured transactions, and fraud against financial institutions, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Combatting Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act of 2024 is like giving the Secret Service more tools to catch bad guys who use the internet to secretly move money or trick banks. It's also going to help make sure the people in charge know how well they're doing at stopping these internet money tricksters.
Summary AI
The Combatting Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act of 2024 aims to enhance the authority of the United States Secret Service in investigating crimes related to digital asset transactions and tackling international cyber criminal activities. It proposes amendments to expand investigative powers to include offenses like structured transactions and unlicensed money transmitting businesses. The bill also extends certain statutory time frames and mandates a study by the Government Accountability Office to assess law enforcement's effectiveness in addressing money laundering in cyber crimes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, named the "Combatting Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act of 2024," seeks to enhance the investigative powers of the United States Secret Service to tackle crimes related to digital asset transactions. The bill addresses the rise in transnational cybercrime activities, particularly focusing on illicit financial operations like unlicensed money transmitting businesses, structured transactions, and financial institution fraud. It also involves amendments to existing legal codes to extend periods of authority and reporting mandates concerning money laundering and cybercrime.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue with the bill is the introduction of the term "structured transactions" within the Secret Service’s expanded authority, which lacks a clear definition. This dearth of clarity might lead to challenges in the legal interpretation and application of the bill. Additionally, the bill removes the term "federally insured" from certain legal contexts without explaining the impacts of such a change, potentially requiring stakeholders to infer how broader categories of institutions might be affected.
The amendment concerning FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) suggests changing a period from "5 years" to "10 years", yet the bill does not offer a rationale for this extension. Without understanding the purpose behind this change, stakeholders may question its policy effectiveness.
Regarding international financial institutions, the bill modifies an aspect of the Otto Warmbier North Korea Nuclear Sanctions and Enforcement Act, but similarly provides no context on how changing a numeric provision from "6" to "10" affects existing legislation. This metric alteration could have unintended implications for sanctions or enforcement mechanisms.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The changes proposed by this bill have broad implications for public financial safety and regulatory oversight. Enhancing the authority of the Secret Service to investigate cybercrimes could strengthen protections against financial fraud and economic crimes at a national level, aiming to increase the public's trust in digital asset transactions. However, the lack of definitional clarity and context about certain legal amendments might provoke confusion and misinterpretation among legal practitioners and financial institutions.
For financial institutions, particularly those no longer described as "federally insured," there could be unforeseen compliance and regulatory challenges as they adjust to the new legal environment. On the international front, ambiguity concerning sanctions connected to North Korea could complicate foreign policy implementations, influencing diplomatic relationships.
While the provision mandating a Government Accountability Office report aims to ensure oversight, the lack of specified procedures and funding could impede the thorough evaluation of law enforcement effectiveness in curbing cyber money laundering.
Conclusion
While the Combatting Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act of 2024 aims to advance law enforcement capabilities to tackle rising cyber crime activities, its effectiveness may be hampered by inadequately defined terms and unexplained amendments. Clearer definitions, comprehensive context for amendments, and detailed implementation strategies would empower both public and private stakeholders to capitalize on the bill's potential benefits while mitigating unforeseen consequences.
Issues
The amendment in Section 2 to include 'structured transactions' without a clear definition or context can lead to legal ambiguity and interpretation challenges, which is significant due to the potential for misuse in regulatory enforcement.
Section 2 also strikes 'federally insured' without clarifying the implications, leading to potential ambiguity and broadened scope of institutions affected, which may be legally and financially significant for those stakeholders.
The amendment in Section 2 inserting 'or 1960' after '879' lacks context, making it difficult for stakeholders to grasp the legal implications without specialized knowledge, thus potentially affecting broader legislative clarity.
Section 3 extends FinCEN exchange periods from '5 years' to '10 years' without rationale or financial implications, raising concerns about potential policy effectiveness and resource allocation, which is significant for regulatory oversight.
The amendments made in Section 4 change a numerical reference from '6' to '10' without context on its impact on the Otto Warmbier North Korea Nuclear Sanctions and Enforcement Act of 2019, which might lead to misunderstandings about its effects on foreign policy and sanctions.
Section 5's requirement for a report does not specify the criteria or budget for the Government Accountability Office’s study, which could affect the thoroughness and accuracy of oversight in deterring money laundering in cyber crimes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The opening section of the document gives the short title of the legislation, officially naming it the “Combatting Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act of 2024”.
2. Expansion of United States Secret Service investigative authorities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates the United States Code to expand the investigative powers of the United States Secret Service. It adds new types of criminal activities and transactions, like structured transactions, to their investigative responsibilities.
3. FinCEN exchange Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends Section 310(d)(3)(A) of title 31 of the United States Code to change the time period mentioned from "5 years" to "10 years" in the clause preceding item (i).
4. International financial institutions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a part of the Otto Warmbier North Korea Nuclear Sanctions and Enforcement Act of 2019 by changing the number "6" to "10" in Section 7125(b).
5. Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Government Accountability Office to conduct a study and report to Congress about how well the law from 2020 that fights money laundering is being put into action. The study should especially look at how good law enforcement is at finding and stopping money laundering in cyber crimes.