Overview
Title
To strengthen requirements for the use of accessible information and communications technology by Federal departments and agencies.
ELI5 AI
The Section 508 Refresh Act of 2024 is a plan to make sure government technology is accessible to everyone, especially people with disabilities, by involving them in tech design, keeping agencies accountable, and providing a special fund to make these improvements happen.
Summary AI
S. 4766, introduced in the Senate, aims to update and strengthen the requirements for Federal departments and agencies in using accessible information and communications technology. Known as the "Section 508 Refresh Act of 2024," the bill proposes changes to existing technology standards to better serve people with disabilities. It mandates the involvement of individuals with disabilities in technology development and creates improved processes for addressing accessibility complaints and procurement. Additionally, it outlines agency accountability measures and requires compliance certification related to technology accessibility.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Section 508 Refresh Act of 2024" aims to enhance the accessibility of information and communications technology used by federal departments and agencies. This legislation proposes amendments to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, particularly updating terminology from "electronic and information technology" to "information and communications technology" to ensure legal and procedural clarity. It seeks to establish uniform processes for technology procurement, complaint handling, and compliance verification to promote inclusive use of technology by individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, it plans to involve people with disabilities in the decision-making and enforcement processes and mandates specific procedures to ensure accountability and adherence to accessibility standards.
Significant Issues
A prominent issue with the bill is the broad and potentially ambiguous definition of "information and communications technology," which could lead to varied interpretations. The amendment may struggle to cover the vast range of technologies uniformly. Another significant concern is the lack of specificity regarding enforcement mechanisms and guidelines to involve people with disabilities in federal processes, which may result in inconsistent application across agencies.
The proposed penalties for vendors not complying with accessibility standards could be excessively severe for smaller businesses, possibly discouraging their involvement in federal contracts and affecting competition. The lack of clear roles for officials like the "Administrator" raises concerns about overlapping jurisdiction and confused responsibilities in implementing the new requirements.
Potential Public Impact
Broadly, the bill seeks to facilitate greater inclusion and accessibility in federal information and communications technology, aiming for a positive impact by ensuring that people with disabilities have equal access to federal digital resources. For the general public, this could mean more accessible websites, electronic documents, and technology systems across federal agencies, which would be beneficial not only for those with disabilities but could also improve usability for all users.
If the bill is successful, it would exemplify a commitment to accessibility, possibly setting a precedence for private sectors to follow suit. However, there may be implementation challenges because of the strict timelines and the administrative burden of establishing new compliance and reporting processes, which could slow down technological updates and rollouts in federal agencies.
Stakeholder Impact
For people with disabilities, the bill promises enhanced engagement and better access to federal technologies, potentially improving their interaction with federal services. However, without clear enforcement strategies and transparent processes, the intended benefits may not be realized efficiently.
Federal agencies might face increased administrative responsibilities and need to allocate resources carefully to adhere to the new requirements within the specified timelines. Smaller vendors in the technology sector may experience financial strain due to the stringent penalties proposed for non-compliance, which could limit their ability to compete for federal contracts, thus affecting economic diversity and innovation.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to advance accessibility and inclusivity significantly, its success will depend on the clarity of definitions, practical enforcement mechanisms, and the support provided to stakeholders for smooth implementation. Adjustments and clarifications might be necessary to ensure an effective transition that benefits both technology users and providers.
Financial Assessment
In examining the financial aspects of the proposed legislation, S. 4766, the commentary will focus on the section detailing financial allocations and how they relate to the possible issues identified within the bill. This bill aims to enhance accessibility of information and communications technology within federal departments and agencies.
Financial Appropriation
The bill authorizes a specific financial allocation to support its implementation and enforcement. According to the final section, $4,500,000 is authorized to be appropriated for the period of fiscal years 2025 through 2029. This allocation is intended to cover the costs associated with the new processes and standards that federal departments and agencies must implement under the bill.
Relation to Identified Issues
Lack of Detailed Justification: One identified issue with the bill is the absence of a detailed justification for the $4,500,000 appropriation. The bill does not provide a breakdown or specific plan on how this amount will be allocated or spent. This lack of detail could lead to concerns about potential wasteful spending or unclear budget allocation, as stakeholders and legislators might be left questioning whether this sum sufficiently addresses the needs outlined in the bill or if it might be excessive.
Resource and Infrastructure Challenges: The timeline for implementing various parts of the bill is uniformly set for "not later than 1 year" post-enactment. This tight deadline could strain resources, and the allocated funding may need to be carefully managed to ensure that all necessary infrastructures are developed and processes are implemented within the stipulated timeframe. Sufficient funding is crucial to address these challenges effectively, and the broad nature of the financial appropriation warrants further scrutiny to confirm it aligns with these pressing needs.
Extension of Existing Programs and Infrastructure: As the bill mandates new processes and standards for accessibility, the authorized funds must cover a wide range of activities, including developing a new complaint process, compliance evaluations, and the establishment of Federal Advisory Committees, if needed. Such tasks might demand considerable resources, and ensuring they are appropriately covered by the proposed budget of $4,500,000 over four years is crucial for preventing gaps in implementation.
Ensuring Market Competition: Another issue raised is the punitive nature of civil penalties against vendors that fail to comply with accessibility standards, as outlined in Section 7. Although penalties are not directly a part of the $4,500,000 budget, it is essential that the funding adequately supports compliance assistance and guidance for vendors, particularly smaller entities. If the appropriations do not cover such supportive measures, it may inadvertently contribute to reduced competition and fewer vendors willing to engage with federal contracts.
In conclusion, while the financial allocation of $4,500,000 aims to ensure compliance with new accessibility standards, its effectiveness will largely depend on the clarity and specificity of its deployment. The bill's success hinges on transparent and targeted financial planning to address the challenges posed by its ambitious initiatives.
Issues
The broad definition of 'information and communications technology' in Section 3 may lead to ambiguity in its application, as it encompasses a wide range of devices and services without precise definitions or examples to clarify its scope.
The lack of clarity on specific enforcement mechanisms in Section 4 for involving people with disabilities might lead to inconsistent implementations across federal departments and agencies.
Section 7 outlines a mandatory civil penalty for vendors that could be overly punitive, especially for smaller vendors, which might disincentivize their participation in government contracts and affect market competition.
The undefined roles and responsibilities in Sections 7 and 8, specifically regarding the 'Administrator' and other officials, might cause overlapping authority or jurisdictional confusion, affecting the implementation of the bill.
The complexity and potentially legalistic language throughout the bill, particularly in Sections 5 and 6, could make it difficult for stakeholders, including federal agencies and the public, to understand and comply with the requirements without additional guidance.
The timeline for implementing various parts of the bill, uniformly set at 'not later than 1 year after the date of enactment,' as seen in multiple sections (e.g., Sections 4, 6, and 7), may not be sufficient time for comprehensive compliance, possibly leading to resource and infrastructure challenges for federal agencies.
The requirement in Section 8 for departments or agencies to establish a Federal Advisory Committee on Equal Access if compliance criteria are not met could lead to unnecessary bureaucracy and inefficiencies.
The $4,500,000 authorized for the implementation of the bill, as noted in Section 10, lacks detailed justification, which could lead to questions about potential wasteful spending or unclear budget allocation.
The potential overlap between FedRAMP requirements and section 508 compliance as mentioned in Section 7(d) needs clearer delineation to prevent contradictory requirements for vendors.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section introduces the official short title of the Act, which is called the “Section 508 Refresh Act of 2024”.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for specific terms used in the Act, including the "Access Board," which is part of the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board from the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Additionally, it defines "Administrator" as the head of the General Services Administration, and clarifies terms like "disability," "Federal department or agency," "information and communications technology," and "section 508" from relevant U.S. laws.
3. Amendments to definitions and terms used in section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 by updating the term “electronic and information technology” to “information and communications technology” in several places. It also adds definitions for terms like “Federal department and agency” and “information and communications technology” to ensure clarity and consistency throughout the Act.
4. Involvement of people with disabilities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to ensure that federal departments and agencies involve people with disabilities in various processes related to enforcing accessibility requirements, developing accessible technology, and handling complaints. Additionally, it requires guidelines to be established for involving people with disabilities in these activities.
5. Authority of the Access Board to ensure compliance with section 508 Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 gives the Access Board the authority to ensure compliance with two sets of standards: those originally required by the Act and those specifically related to section 508. It involves modifying and adding specific language to section 502(b)(1) to cover both standards effectively.
6. Uniform Complaint Process; incorporation of people with disabilities in enforcement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the establishment of a new, uniform complaint process by the Access Board, which allows individuals to file complaints against Federal departments or agencies for not complying with accessibility standards. It requires the integration of feedback from people with disabilities and ensures the transition from the old complaint process, providing remedies and procedures for civil actions.
7. Procurement process for information and communications technology Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the establishment of a standardized process for testing and reporting information and communications technology that federal agencies buy, ensuring compliance with accessibility standards under section 508. It includes measures such as penalties for non-compliance, a bonus system for vendors identifying missing requirements, streamlining assessments of technology products, and only authorizing FedRAMP products that fully meet these standards.
8. Agency accountability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines accountability measures for federal agencies to comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, including appointing compliance officers, conducting continuous accessibility testing, and establishing advisory committees if non-compliance occurs. It also requires performance appraisal guidelines for senior executives and regular certification of compliance to ensure federal technology is accessible to individuals with disabilities.
9. Reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates various reporting requirements for compliance with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, focusing on accessibility of information and communications technology by Federal departments and agencies. It requires annual compliance reports, details on unresolved complaints, exceptions to section 508 requirements, and an evaluation by the Comptroller General, while ensuring that all reports are accessible to the public.
10. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
There is a budget of $4,500,000 approved to fund this Act from the fiscal years 2025 to 2029.
Money References
- There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act $4,500,000 for the period of fiscal years 2025 through 2029.