Overview

Title

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize programs and research relating to autism, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 4762 is a plan to keep helping people with autism by making programs better and giving more money to support research, learning, and care for them until 2029. It also wants to make sure these programs are fair for everyone and share updates on how well they're doing.

Summary AI

S. 4762 aims to amend the Public Health Service Act to renew and enhance programs related to autism and research in the United States. The bill updates certain terminologies and extends the timeline for various autism-related programs until 2029. It also includes provisions for improving access to education, early detection, intervention services, and technical assistance for individuals with autism. Additionally, the bill authorizes increased appropriations to support these initiatives and mandates reports to Congress on the progress and needs of autism programs.

Published

2024-07-24
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-07-24
Package ID: BILLS-118s4762is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,713
Pages:
8
Sentences:
21

Language

Nouns: 456
Verbs: 130
Adjectives: 62
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 93
Entities: 89

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.99
Average Sentence Length:
81.57
Token Entropy:
4.77
Readability (ARI):
41.19

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The Autism Collaboration, Accountability, Research, Education, and Support Act of 2024, also known as the Autism CARES Act of 2024, aims to amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize and expand existing programs and research related to autism. The bill focuses on improving autism-related research, education, interventions, and services. It proposes funding increases and extends support for initiatives that address autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental disabilities in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner. Additionally, the bill emphasizes coordination among federal agencies and mandates reports on young adults transitioning from school-based services to adult services. It also highlights the need for technical assistance to improve access to communication tools for individuals with autism.

Summary of Significant Issues

A primary concern with the bill is the lack of justification for increased funding allocations, which could be perceived as potential wasteful spending. The phrase "culturally and linguistically appropriate" regarding autism education and interventions lacks specificity, potentially leading to inconsistent application. The transition report addressing young adults moving to adult services is vague, possibly resulting in a lack of actionable insights. There is also a reduction in the reporting frequency of certain committees, which might delay responses to emerging issues in autism care. Lastly, there are concerns about favoritism towards certain specialties in research, and the absence of clear guidelines for the provision and evaluation of technical assistance services.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to enhance support and resources for individuals with autism, which could lead to improved outcomes in education, healthcare, and quality of life for those affected. By increasing funding and expanding research, the bill could bring about new insights into autism spectrum disorder, leading to better interventions and support mechanisms. However, the lack of clear guidelines and oversight could result in inefficiencies and misallocated resources, thus diluting the intended benefits.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For individuals with autism and their families, the reauthorization of programs and increased focus on transitions to adulthood could provide critical support during key life stages. The emphasis on culturally and linguistically appropriate interventions aims to ensure inclusivity and accessibility for diverse populations. However, given the vague language around these aspects, the effectiveness of delivery might vary.

Healthcare professionals specializing in autism could see an expansion of training and research opportunities, especially with increased federal funding. Concerns of favoritism might arise for professionals outside the highlighted specialties, raising questions about equitable support across different medical and therapeutic fields.

States and local communities might benefit from the technical assistance provided, helping to better allocate funds for autism services. However, without clear guidance on evidence-based tools and technologies, efforts might result in varied efficacy across regions.

Overall, while the Autism CARES Act of 2024 is a step forward in supporting individuals with autism, its success will depend heavily on the clarity and implementation of its proposals. More detailed guidelines and accountability measures could enhance its effectiveness and ensure that resources are used wisely.

Financial Assessment

The bill, S. 4762, proposes amendments to the Public Health Service Act with a focus on renewing and enhancing programs related to autism. Several financial allocations are outlined within the legislation, particularly in Section 399EE, where appropriations for various autism-related initiatives are specified.

Financial Appropriations

Section 2, Subsection (e):
The bill specifies increased financial appropriations for different programs spanning fiscal years 2025 through 2029. These include:

  • $28,100,000 annually for developmental disabilities surveillance and research.
  • $56,344,000 annually for autism education and early detection programs.
  • $306,000,000 annually for broader autism programs.

These figures mark a notable increase from the previous appropriations (fiscal years 2020 through 2024), highlighting a continued emphasis on funding autism-related initiatives.

Concerns with Increased Appropriations

One of the primary issues identified relates to the significant increase in these appropriations without a detailed justification or expected outcomes. Such substantial financial commitments could be perceived as potential wasteful spending if not clearly justified. Without a defined rationale, stakeholders might question the necessity and projected benefits of these enhanced allocations.

Clarity and Consistency in Terminology

The bill introduces the term "culturally and linguistically appropriate" in the context of autism education and early detection. However, this phrase is somewhat vague and could lead to varied interpretations across different programs and regions. In terms of financial implications, this lack of specificity might result in inconsistent implementation, potentially affecting the efficient use of allocated funds.

Evaluation and Reporting

Section 399DD(c):
There is a directive for reporting on the transition of young adults with autism to adulthood. However, without specific metrics or success criteria outlined, it is challenging to evaluate the effectiveness or impact of financial investment in this area. A lack of detailed evaluation criteria may lead to reports that are unfocused and potentially non-actionable.

Research Promotion Without Defined Scope

The bill mentions promoting research related to autism without detailing the specific scope or expected outcomes. This lack of clarity could complicate assessments of whether financial resources are being directed effectively towards achieving meaningful results. If the focus of the research is not clearly defined, it is hard to gauge the return on investment for the increased appropriations.

Reporting Frequency and Oversight

The amendment from annual to biennial reporting may delay addressing emerging concerns in autism care. While this may not immediately affect financial allocations, a reduced frequency of reporting might impact the timeliness of financial oversight and the ability to react promptly to evolving needs or inefficiencies.

Technical Assistance and Evidence-Based Criteria

Section 4:
This section discusses technical assistance for improving access to communication tools. However, it lacks specificity on what constitutes "evidence-based services, tools, and technologies." Without clear criteria, there is a risk of inefficiencies in how funds are used, as jurisdictions may struggle to align their initiatives with the intended evidence-based standards.

Summary

The bill makes substantial financial commitments towards autism-related initiatives but simultaneously raises questions about justification, scope, and oversight of these spending increases. Clarity in implementation guidelines, evaluation metrics, and oversight mechanisms will be crucial to ensure that the appropriated funds yield the desired outcomes and advancements in autism programs.

Issues

  • The bill does not provide a justification or expected outcomes for the significant increase in appropriations in Section 399EE, which raises funding for fiscal years 2025 through 2029 (Section 2, subsection (e)). Without a clear rationale, this could be perceived as potential wasteful spending.

  • The phrase 'culturally and linguistically appropriate' in Section 399BB is vague and could lead to varied interpretations. More specific criteria or examples might be necessary to ensure consistent implementation (Section 2, subsection (b)).

  • The transition report in Section 399DD(c) lacks specificity on the key challenges or actionable insights regarding the transition of young adults with autism to adulthood. This lack of clarity could result in a report that is unfocused and non-actionable (Section 2, subsection (d)).

  • The bill frequently uses the term 'promote research' in Section 399BB(f) without detailing the scope of research or expected outcomes, making it difficult to assess the effectiveness or focus of the funding (Section 2, subsection (b)).

  • The amendment reducing reporting frequency from annual to biennial in Section 399CC(c)(6)(B) may delay addressing emerging concerns or trends in autism care and research (Section 2, subsection (c)).

  • The section on technical assistance in Section 4 does not specify any criteria or guidelines for determining what constitutes 'evidence-based services, tools, and technologies,' which might lead to inefficiencies in fund use (Section 4).

  • The lack of specific metrics or success criteria outlined for amendments makes it challenging to evaluate the impact of the proposed changes and spending increases (Throughout the bill).

  • There is no mention of any oversight or accountability measures in Section 4 to ensure the effectiveness of technical assistance provided and proper use of funds (Section 4).

  • The inclusion of specific fields such as 'psychiatry, psychology, gerontology, developmental behavioral pediatrics, audiology' may raise concerns about potential favoritism towards these specialties without justification (Section 3).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the name of the law is the "Autism Collaboration, Accountability, Research, Education, and Support Act of 2024," also known as the "Autism CARES Act of 2024."

2. Programs relating to autism Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines several amendments to the Public Health Service Act concerning autism-related programs. It includes changes to terms and dates, funding increases for future years, and additional reporting requirements, including a focus on young adults transitioning from school-based services to adulthood.

Money References

  • (a) Developmental disabilities surveillance and research program.—Section 399AA of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280i) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking “tribe, or a tribal” and inserting “Tribe, or a Tribal”; (2) in subsection (d)(1)— (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking “tribe; tribal” and inserting “Tribe; Tribal”; (B) by striking “tribe” and inserting “Tribe”; and (C) by striking “tribal” and inserting “Tribal”; and (3) in subsection (e), by striking “2024” and inserting “2029”. (b) Autism education, early detection, and intervention.—Section 399BB of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280i–1) is amended— (1) in subsections (b)(1) and (c), by striking “culturally competent” each place it appears and inserting “culturally and linguistically appropriate”; (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking “screening” each place it appears and inserting “screening and diagnostic”; (B) in paragraph (3), by striking “higher risk” and inserting “increased likelihood”; and (C) in paragraph (7), by striking “higher risk” and inserting “increased likelihood”; (3) in subsection (e)(2), by adding at the end the following: “(C) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of the Autism CARES Act of 2024, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report that examines the need for developmental-behavioral pediatricians and the feasibility of expanding the developmental-behavioral pediatrician training programs described in subparagraph (A).”; (4) by amending subsection (f) to read as follows: “(f) Intervention.—The Secretary shall promote research, through grants or contracts, which may include grants or contracts to research centers or networks, to— “(1) develop and evaluate evidence-based practices and interventions to improve outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder or other developmental disabilities by addressing physical and behavioral health and communication needs of such individuals across the lifespan; “(2) develop guidelines for such evidence-based interventions; and “(3) disseminate information related to such evidence-based practices and interventions and guidelines.”; and (5) in subsection (g), by striking “2024” and inserting “2029”. (c) Interagency autism coordinating committee.—Section 399CC of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280i–2) is amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking “develop a summary of” and inserting “summarize, on an annual basis,”; (B) in paragraph (5)(A), by striking “proposed budgetary requirements” and inserting “a professional judgment of anticipated budgetary needs”; and (C) in paragraph (6)(B), by striking “an annual” and inserting “a biennial”; and (2) in subsection (f), by striking “2024” and inserting “2029”. (d) Reports to Congress.—Section 399DD of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280i–3) is amended— (1) by striking “2019” each place it appears and inserting “2024”; (2) in subsection (a)(1)— (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking “In General” and inserting “In general”; (B) by striking “Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee of the Senate and the Energy and Commerce Committee” and inserting “Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce”; and (C) by striking “Internet Web site” and inserting “website”; and (3) by adding at the end the following: “(c) Update on young adults and youth transitioning to adulthood.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of the Autism CARES Act of 2024, the Secretary, in coordination with other Federal departments and agencies that serve individuals with autism spectrum disorder, shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives an update to the report required pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, as added by section 6 of the Autism CARES Act of 2014 and in effect before the date of enactment of the Autism CARES Act of 2019, concerning young adults with autism spectrum disorder and the challenges related to the transition from existing school-based services to services available during adulthood.”. (e) Authorization of appropriations.—Section 399EE of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280i–4) is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking “$23,100,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024” and inserting “$28,100,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029”; (2) in subsection (b), by striking “$50,599,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024” and inserting “$56,344,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029”; and (3) in subsection (c), by striking “$296,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024” and inserting “$306,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029”. ---

3. Expansion, intensification, and coordination of activities of National Institutes of Health with respect to research on autism spectrum disorder Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 409C of the Public Health Service Act enhances the research on autism spectrum disorder at the National Institutes of Health by expanding the fields involved, such as psychiatry and gerontology, and emphasizes that the Director should consider the diverse needs of individuals with autism, including co-occurring conditions, when planning these activities.

4. Technical assistance to improve access to communication tools Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Health and Human Services is allowed to provide training and help to states, tribes, and other regions to use federal funds to support communication for people with autism and developmental disabilities. Each year, the Secretary must report to certain congressional committees about the assistance provided and any progress made in developing these communication tools and services.