Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude debt held by certain insurance companies from capital assets.
ELI5 AI
The Secure Family Futures Act of 2024 is a plan to change how insurance companies count some of the money they owe, so they might pay a different amount in taxes. It decides which insurance companies can use these new rules and when they start.
Summary AI
The bill S. 4740, titled the “Secure Family Futures Act of 2024,” proposes changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It aims to exclude certain debts held by insurance companies from being considered capital assets. This change affects how these companies report financial transactions for tax purposes. The bill also specifies which insurance companies are involved by defining "applicable insurance company" and outlines conditions under which these changes take effect.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Bill Summary
The proposed legislation, titled the Secure Family Futures Act of 2024, seeks to amend a portion of U.S. tax law—specifically the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The core aim is to redefine how certain types of debt are categorized for specific insurance companies in terms of tax calculations. By excluding particular debt holdings from being treated as capital assets, certain insurance companies will have a different tax treatment, potentially affecting their financial obligations to the government.
Significant Issues
One of the pressing issues with this bill is its potential favoritism. By excluding certain debts held by insurance companies from capital assets, the bill could be seen as favoring insurance companies that qualify as "applicable" under the new definitions. This means companies not described in specific sections of the Internal Revenue Code might have an advantageous tax position compared to others.
Another issue is the complexity of the language used to define what an "applicable insurance company" is. Since it references various other sections and subsections of tax law, insurance companies and their tax advisors might find it challenging to accurately determine eligibility. This complexity could lead to confusion and possibly result in errors in tax compliance.
Additionally, the transition rule allowing certain prior capital losses to be carried over as net operating losses might be unclear. How companies apply this rule needs clearer guidelines to ensure proper compliance and application.
Public Impact
For the general public, this bill's effects won't necessarily be direct or immediately noticeable. However, it might impact the broader insurance market and the financial strategies employed by insurance companies. Any shifts in tax liabilities could potentially influence how these companies invest, price their products, or approach their risk management practices, indirectly influencing policyholders.
Impact on Stakeholders
Insurance Companies
For insurance companies that meet the criteria as "applicable," there could be a positive impact, as they might see benefits in their tax treatments. This change could lead to increased profitability, allowing for potential reinvestment into their services or more competitive offerings in the insurance market.
Conversely, companies that do not meet these criteria might find themselves disadvantaged. They could perceive this amendment as an uneven playing field, where tax benefits are selectively available, potentially increasing the cost of compliance as they try to reclassify or restructure to meet the new definitions.
Tax Professionals and Advisors
The complexity introduced by the bill's referencing of multiple tax code sections might lead to increased demand for tax advisory services. Professionals could see this as a business opportunity but also face challenges ensuring clients understand and correctly apply the new rules.
Policymakers and Legislators
This bill presents a broader question for lawmakers about fairness and transparency in tax legislation. There might be calls for more comprehensive explanations or even debates on whether such exclusions are in the public's best interest, prompting further examination and discussion on tax equity.
In summary, while the bill aims to refine certain tax treatments for specific insurance companies, its implications are multifaceted, with potential advantages and challenges for different stakeholders within the insurance industry and beyond.
Issues
The exclusion of debt instruments held by 'applicable insurance companies' from being treated as capital assets in Section 2(a) might favor certain types of insurance companies, especially those not falling under the explicit exclusions in the definition of 'applicable insurance company.' This could raise fairness concerns and potential political debate.
The definition of 'applicable insurance company' in Section 2(b) is complex, as it references multiple other sections and exceptions, potentially leading to confusion and misunderstanding. This complexity might impact the ability of companies to accurately determine their status under this provision.
The language in Section 2(b) concerning exclusions under Sections 831(b)(2)(A)(iii), 835(a), 842, and 833 could be difficult for non-experts to understand without additional context or clarification, potentially leading to misinterpretations by taxpayers and complications in compliance.
The transition rule in Section 2(d) might need clarification on how taxpayers should specifically calculate and apply the net operating loss carryover, as this could affect financial reporting and tax liabilities for companies undergoing a transition under the new rule.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill, titled "Short title," states that the legislation may be referred to as the "Secure Family Futures Act of 2024."
2. Debt not treated as capital asset for applicable insurance companies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that for certain insurance companies, debts like notes and bonds will not count as capital assets, impacting how they calculate taxes. It also details which insurance companies are affected and outlines when these changes take effect, including a rule for handling prior losses.