Overview

Title

To limit the separation of families at or near ports of entry.

ELI5 AI

The "Keep Families Together Act" is a rule that tries to keep kids and their parents together when they come to the U.S., except when it's not safe, and also makes sure families know what's happening if they do get separated.

Summary AI

S. 4723, known as the "Keep Families Together Act," aims to establish rules to prevent the separation of children from their parents or legal guardians at or near U.S. ports of entry and within 100 miles of the border. The bill prohibits separation except under specific circumstances, such as if a court rules it's in the child's best interest or the child is in danger of abuse or trafficking. It requires documenting reasons for any separations, ensuring family unity, and providing parents with regular updates on their separated child's status. Additionally, it mandates training for agents on child welfare and requires annual reports on family separations.

Published

2024-07-11
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-07-11
Package ID: BILLS-118s4723is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
10
Words:
2,608
Pages:
13
Sentences:
47

Language

Nouns: 798
Verbs: 167
Adjectives: 109
Adverbs: 25
Numbers: 101
Entities: 136

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.05
Average Sentence Length:
55.49
Token Entropy:
5.15
Readability (ARI):
28.78

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation titled "Keep Families Together Act," introduced as S. 4723 in the 118th Congress, aims to limit the separation of families at or near U.S. ports of entry. Initiated by various senators, this bill is primarily focused on preventing the separation of children from their parents or legal guardians under immigration-related circumstances, except in specific conditions related to child safety and trafficking concerns.

Summary of the Bill

The bill provides a framework for limiting the separation of families at U.S. borders. It establishes that children should not be removed from their parents or legal guardians unless a state court or a child welfare agency determines it is in the child's best interest due to risks like abuse, trafficking, or if it is strongly suspected that the accompanying adult is not the guardian. Additionally, it mandates rigorous documentation and training for officers implementing these procedures, emphasizes keeping siblings together, and presumes that detention is not in families' best interest.

Significant Issues

One of the major concerns is the lack of detailed definitions, particularly regarding what constitutes the "best interests of the child," which could lead to subjective and inconsistent decision-making. The criteria for determining whether an adult is not a child's parent or guardian are also vague, potentially leading to wrongful separations and legal challenges.

Furthermore, the broad inclusion of federal contractors in relevant roles might result in ambiguity and accountability issues. The bill's exclusion of migration-related dangers under abuse or neglect protection could leave some children unprotected during perilous migration.

Public Impact

Broadly, the bill seeks to protect family unity and reduce trauma caused by separating children from their families upon entering the United States. This approach could foster more humane immigration practices and lessen psychological impacts on children.

However, inconsistent application due to subjective definitions and lack of clear guidelines may lead to unequal treatment in practice, impacting the trust and efficiency of immigration enforcement.

Stakeholder Impact

For immigration enforcement agencies, this bill could require significant changes in practice, including additional training and documentation, potentially leading to increased operational costs. While this could improve agents' understanding of children's needs, it demands proper resource allocation, which is not plainly addressed in the bill.

The bill is likely to positively impact families entering or residing in the U.S. by prioritizing family unity and reducing unnecessary separations. This could improve the mental health and well-being of children who might otherwise experience separation trauma. Conversely, any lack of clarity or poor implementation guidelines in the bill could pose challenges to enforcement officials, who must balance law enforcement with these new protective measures.

Conclusion

Overall, the "Keep Families Together Act" focuses on protecting family unity at U.S. borders while balancing enforcement and humanitarian concerns. However, addressing the identified issues, such as clearer definitions and provisions for adequate training and resources, is essential for achieving consistent and effective implementation. This balance will be crucial to harnessing the bill's potential benefits while minimizing negative impacts on immigration practices and affected families.

Issues

  • The lack of specific definitions for 'best interests of the child' in Section 3 could lead to subjective interpretations and inconsistent applications, potentially impacting child welfare decisions.

  • The vague criteria for determining the 'strong likelihood that the adult is not the parent or legal guardian of the child' in Section 3(a)(3)(B) might result in wrongful separations and legal challenges.

  • The broad inclusion of contractors under the definition of 'agent' and 'officer' in Section 2 could create ambiguity about roles and responsibilities, potentially leading to regulatory enforcement and accountability issues.

  • The exclusion of migration-related dangers in the definition of 'danger of abuse or neglect' in Section 2 might unnecessarily limit protections for children during migration.

  • The requirement for periodic training and compliance with Section 4 on the separation guidelines may result in substantial costs and raise questions regarding cost-effectiveness and resource allocation.

  • The subjective term 'strong presumption in favor of family unity' in Section 5 could result in varied interpretations and enforcement by different agents or officers.

  • The lack of specified procedures or verification measures for ensuring compliance with the presumptions in Section 5 might undermine the bill’s effectiveness in protecting family interests.

  • The absence of specific funding appropriation details for key provisions such as training and public guidance development in Sections 4 and 6 could lead to resource allocation challenges and inefficiencies.

  • Section 6’s 180-day deadline for publishing public guidance may be too short, affecting the quality and comprehensiveness of the guidance due to potential consultation and administrative delays.

  • The requirement for language access in Section 6 is mentioned without details on the process or resources needed for providing guidance in multiple languages, which could hinder effective communication.

  • There is no defined oversight mechanism for timely updates or monitoring of child welfare information in Section 7, which could affect information reliability and family reunification efforts.

  • The GAO report on asylum seeker prosecution required in Section 10 might be limited by the unspecified criteria for resource allocation and data collection, potentially impacting study comprehensiveness.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Keep Families Together Act outlines its title and includes a table of contents listing sections about keeping families together, such as definitions, limitations on family separation, guidelines for officers, policies for finding separated children, and annual reporting requirements on family separations.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, several terms are defined: "agent" and "officer" include federal contractors; a "child" is under 18 with no permanent status in the U.S.; "committees of jurisdiction" and "designated agency" are specific U.S. governmental bodies; "finding" involves written assessments; and "Secretary" usually refers to the Secretary of Homeland Security.

3. Limitation on the separation of families Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section prohibits the removal of a child from their parent or legal guardian near U.S. borders unless a state court or child welfare agency determines it is in the child's best interest, or an official identifies risks like trafficking or abuse. Additionally, separations cannot occur solely to deter migration or enforce immigration laws, and any authorized separation must be documented with reasons and evidence.

4. Recommendations for separation by agents or officers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary, with input from the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to create training and guidance focused on the best interests of children for agents and officers. This guidance must be reviewed annually, include evidence-based practices, and require all agents, officers, and management to undergo specific training, including trauma-informed child welfare practices.

5. Presumptions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the Act, there is a strong priority placed on keeping families together. The Secretary should try to keep siblings together, and it's generally assumed that detention is not in the best interests of families and children.

6. Required policy for locating separated children Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Secretary, along with other organizations, to create guidance on how parents or guardians can find their children if they were separated under specific circumstances. This guidance must be published within 180 days, given in writing to affected parents, and provided in multiple languages as needed.

7. Required information for separated families Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary must provide monthly updates to the parents or guardians of children separated from their families, including reports on the child's activities, education, health, immigration status, and other information to support family reunification.

8. Annual report on family separation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary to submit an annual report to relevant committees detailing instances where a child was separated from a parent or legal guardian. The report must include information on the relationship, age, and gender of those involved, reasons for the separation, any criminal charges, asylum claims, and the impact on siblings, as well as any other relevant information at the Secretary's discretion.

9. Clarifications Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section clarifies that if a child is separated from a parent or legal guardian without a court ending parental rights, it's assumed those rights remain and the separation isn't evidence of abuse or neglect. It also specifies that the act does not change any existing federal or state child welfare laws or any other legal rights of parents, guardians, or children.

10. GAO report on prosecution of asylum seekers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section directs the United States Comptroller General to study how asylum seekers have been prosecuted from 2014 to 2023. The study will cover various aspects like the number of people prosecuted, types of charges, impact on families, resources used, and outcomes of these cases, with a report due to Congress one year after the law is enacted.