Overview
Title
To prohibit the United States from collaborating with certain foreign countries of concern on fundamental research intended to support the military, intelligence, or security capabilities of the United States, to strengthen the security and integrity of the United States scientific and research enterprise, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The FORTIFY United States Research Act is like a safety rule that says the U.S. shouldn't team up with certain countries to do science projects that might help build big tools for defense or security because it could be risky. It also says there should be a list of these risky projects and that people need to be careful when sharing important science secrets.
Summary AI
S. 4722, also known as the "FORTIFY United States Research Act," aims to enhance the security of U.S. scientific and research enterprises by prohibiting collaboration on fundamental research with certain foreign countries that could threaten national security. It mandates the creation of a database to track risky research collaborations, restricts federal grants that involve foreign entities from countries of concern, and imposes penalties on institutions that violate these rules. Additionally, it requires improved visa processing to prevent the acquisition of sensitive technologies by foreign adversaries and ensures sponsors of exchange programs comply with export control regulations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The legislation under consideration is titled the Furthering Operations for Resiliency, Transparency, and Integrity to Fortify (FORTIFY) United States Research Act. Its primary aim is to regulate and restrict collaborative research efforts that involve certain foreign countries deemed a threat to U.S. national security. The bill outlines a comprehensive strategy to safeguard federally funded research related to military, intelligence, or security by imposing strict guidelines on partnerships, particularly with nations like China. This involves the creation of investigative bodies, databases to track high-risk collaborations, and penalties for non-compliance. Furthermore, it seeks to enhance the integrity and security of grant application processes and regulate the technology access for foreign nationals.
Summary of Significant Issues
A notable issue within the bill arises from its broad scope, particularly concerning what constitutes "problematic research collaboration." The lack of precise definitions may lead to misinterpretation and unintended consequences. Additionally, the term "country of concern" is ambiguous, which could inadvertently include nations not posing direct threats to U.S. security and might cause diplomatic friction.
The criteria employed to determine high-risk entities lack transparency, potentially leading to arbitrary or biased judgments. The penalties for non-compliance, such as the financial repayment obligations imposed on institutions, are perceived as excessively harsh without considering intent.
Furthermore, provisions allow the President considerable discretion in waiving certain restrictions, potentially compromising the bill's intent by weakening oversight. The absence of clear guidelines for audits by congressional committees raises concerns about potential politicization and bias. Moreover, unclear funding considerations for implementing studies and databases create financial ambiguity.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill aims to enhance national security by curbing potentially harmful research partnerships; however, it risks creating an atmosphere of suspicion and potential targeting based on loose criteria. Members of the public involved in or supportive of international collaborative research may view these measures as infringing on academic freedom and innovation.
By heightening scrutiny and legal consequences within academic and research institutions, the bill's enforcement may lead to heightened stresses around compliance, potentially burdening institutions with administrative overhead and legal complexities. This could inadvertently stifle innovation and international cooperation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For academic and research institutions, the legislation carries substantial implications. The imposition of severe penalties could discourage partnerships with international bodies due to potential risks of being flagged for non-compliance. Additionally, this could affect funding inflows and limit opportunities for collaborative advancements in technology and sciences.
Foreign nationals working or studying in the U.S. might face increased scrutiny and restricted access to research. Students and researchers from countries identified as threats may encounter visa challenges, negatively impacting cultural and educational exchanges.
Conversely, government agencies focused on national security could benefit from enhanced mechanisms to monitor and curb foreign influence. This oversight is intended to protect sensitive data and technologies and align with broader national interests. However, the effectiveness of these measures may rely heavily on their implementation and the transparency of the processes involved.
Issues
The bill's scope appears to be broad and could potentially lead to unintended discrimination or misinterpretation when referring to 'problematic research collaboration' with certain foreign countries of concern, such as China. This may lead to ethical concerns and misapplication (Sections 2 and 3).
The definition of 'country of concern' is vague, potentially capturing nations that are not a direct threat to national security. This lack of specificity might cause diplomatic tensions or arbitrary decisions (Section 3).
The mechanism for determining 'problematic research collaborations' lacks specificity, and the criteria for determining high-risk entities could lead to arbitrary or biased decisions without transparent processes, raising fairness concerns (Section 2).
The penalties imposed for non-compliance with the Federal grant application requirements could be considered overly punitive, especially concerning the financial repayment obligations without considering the intent of involved institutions (Section 3).
The bill provides the President with broad discretion to waive restrictions for up to 180 days, which could be seen as undermining the bill's integrity without adequate oversight, potentially raising transparency and accountability issues (Section 6).
There is no detailed explanation or appropriate criteria for the exploitation of audit powers by congressional committees, which may lead to potentially politicized and biased investigations into research entities (Section 3).
The bill lacks clarity regarding budget or funding considerations for required studies and databases, leading to potential financial ambiguity or risk of resource misallocation (Sections 2 and 4).
The language concerning restrictions on certain aliens from acquiring emerging technologies appears complex and potentially subject to broad interpretation, which may undermine the precise intentions of the bill (Section 6).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Furthering Operations for Resiliency, Transparency, and Integrity to Fortify (FORTIFY) United States Research Act is introduced to enhance the integrity and security of U.S. research. It includes measures like studying problematic research collaborations with China, securing federal research funding, fighting grant application fraud, regulating technology access by foreign nationals, and ensuring transparency and privacy in research practices.
2. Working group on understanding scale and scope of problematic research collaboration between China and recipients of Federal research funding Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section requires the Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center to form a working group to investigate and understand research collaborations between China and U.S. federal funding recipients that might threaten national security. This group will create and maintain an open, unclassified database to help identify high-risk research entities linked to China's defense industry and will report its findings annually to Congress.
3. Research integrity and security Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Research Integrity and Security Act of 2024 aims to protect U.S. federally funded research by prohibiting collaboration with countries identified as national security threats on certain military-related research projects. It includes definitions for key terms like "country of concern" and sets conditions and penalties for non-compliance while allowing national security exceptions when certified by the Secretary of Defense or Energy.
4. Study on United States research partnerships with the People's Republic of China Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering complete a study within a year on research partnerships between the United States and China funded by the U.S. Government. It also requires an assessment of the benefits of these partnerships and the principles of open research. Following the study, a briefing on the findings must be given to specific Congressional committees.
5. Federal grant application fraud Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines a new law addressing federal grant application fraud, describing terms such as "Federal grant," "foreign compensation," and "outside compensation." It prohibits individuals from submitting deceitful grant applications or documents, imposing penalties including fines, imprisonment, and a ban on receiving federal grants for five years, with exceptions for authorized law enforcement or intelligence activities.
1041. Federal grant application fraud Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section defines various terms related to fraud in federal grant applications, such as what constitutes a "Federal agency" and "Federal grant," and outlines penalties for those who knowingly submit false or misleading information in these applications. Exceptions are made for activities related to lawful investigations by law enforcement or intelligence agencies.
6. Restricting the acquisition of emerging technologies by certain aliens Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Secretary of State and other federal agencies to identify and report on foreign individuals who might misuse new technologies to harm U.S. national security, making these individuals ineligible for U.S. visas. It also involves sharing updates with Congress and allows the President to waive restrictions in specific cases if it benefits national security.
7. Machine readable visa documents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of State to ensure that visa application forms and supporting documents are available in a machine-readable format to help detect fraud and enforce laws, unless a waiver is issued with prior notice to Congress. Additionally, the Secretary must report on the storage and sharing of visa documents, and explore the costs and benefits of using technology to make all visa information machine-readable while protecting personal data.
8. Certifications regarding access to export controlled technology in educational and cultural exchange programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 requires sponsors of exchange programs to ensure that foreign researchers do not access technology controlled by U.S. export laws unless authorized. Sponsors must certify to the Department of State whether a license is needed to share such technology and submit plans to prevent unauthorized access.
9. Mandatory placement of research and development applicants failing to disclose required information in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text modifies a law to make it mandatory for the government to label any research and development applicants who fail to disclose necessary information as noncompliant in a federal system. This update also requires the disclosure of any business ties with certain foreign countries, while reorganizing some parts of the existing law.
10. Privacy and confidentiality Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section ensures that the new Act does not change or interfere with existing privacy rights and rules outlined in the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2018.