Overview
Title
To require the Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess current efforts to respond to hazardous weather and water events at or near United States borders and, to the extent such efforts may be improved, to develop a hazardous weather and water events preparedness and response strategy, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Border Weather Resiliency Act of 2024 wants to make sure that people working at the borders are safe when bad weather happens. It asks them to make a plan for handling these kinds of weather and water problems better by talking to lots of experts and helpers.
Summary AI
The Border Weather Resiliency Act of 2024 (S. 4672) requires the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to evaluate the effects of hazardous weather and water events on border personnel, technology, and infrastructure. The bill mandates the creation of a strategy for improving preparedness and response efforts to such events, ensuring the safety and welfare of both Customs personnel and individuals undergoing inspection. Additionally, it involves consulting various federal, state, and tribal officials and experts, and requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide periodic reports on progress and recommendations for mitigating the impacts of these events.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Border Weather Resiliency Act of 2024," seeks to enhance the United States' preparedness and response to hazardous weather and water events that could impact operations and safety at or near U.S. borders. This bill mandates that the Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) assess current response efforts to such events within the past five years, followed by the development and implementation of strategies to mitigate their impacts. The legislation specifies responsibilities, deadlines for assessments, developing strategies, and creating safety protocols. Additionally, it requires reports and consultation with a broad range of stakeholders.
Significant Issues
There are several notable issues identified in the bill:
Lack of Budgetary Clarity: One of the primary concerns is the absence of specific provisions regarding budget allocation or funding sources. This financial ambiguity appears across several sections, potentially leading to overspending or insufficient financial planning, crucial in implementing the actions proposed by the bill.
Implementation Framework: The bill does not clearly outline how the findings from initial assessments will translate into actionable outcomes. This is problematic as it may result in discussions without tangible improvements or adaptations being applied in practice.
Oversight and Transparency: There's an apparent lack of mechanisms for independent oversight or review of the assessments and strategies devised. This absence might compromise objectivity and introduce conflicts of interest. The exclusion of consultations under the Federal Advisory Committee Act further limits transparency and public oversight.
Complex Language: The legislative language, particularly in detailed sections, is dense and might prove challenging for individuals unfamiliar with typical legislative or governmental jargon, potentially affecting comprehensibility and engagement from the wider public.
Impact on the Public
The bill could provide significant benefits if executed effectively, particularly by enhancing the safety and operational effectiveness of U.S. Customs and Border Protection during extreme weather events. This could, in turn, ensure better protection of borders, minimize disasters' disruptions, and safeguard public assets and personnel.
However, without clarity on budget and transparency in execution, public funds might face risks of mismanagement, leading to skepticism about governmental efficacy in addressing weather-related challenges. Moreover, the alignment of practical outcomes with legislative efforts will determine its real impact on public safety and resource utilization.
Impact on Stakeholders
U.S. Customs and Border Protection: The primary stakeholder likely to be impacted is the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The mandate for assessments and strategy development is intended to improve operational effectiveness and safety during adverse weather and water events, benefiting personnel and infrastructure. However, the lack of specificity in funding details could challenge the implementation of recommended changes.
Government Agencies and Tribal Entities: The bill envisions broad collaboration across various governmental and tribal entities, necessitating coordination and engagement. While this collaboration could foster a comprehensive approach to weather resilience, the absence of clear guidelines for consultation scope could lead to unbalanced or under-representative involvement.
General Public: For the general public, particularly those living near borders, effective implementation of the bill’s provisions means increased safety and dependability of border operations. The ability of CBP to withstand adverse weather without significant disruptions could correlate with better economic and social stability in these regions.
Experts and Contractors: Nongovernmental experts in meteorology and infrastructure may play a role in strategy formulation and implementation. The breadth of engagement could empower expert involvement but might also skew toward preferred selections due to vague selection criteria, potentially biasing results.
In conclusion, while the "Border Weather Resiliency Act of 2024" lays out a framework for addressing key challenges arising from severe weather at U.S. borders, its success largely hinges on resolving financial and procedural ambiguities to ensure that intended benefits are realized efficiently and transparently.
Issues
The bill lacks specific details on budget or funding allocations for various sections (Sections 3, 4, and 5), leading to potential overspending or inadequate financial planning.
The text does not provide a framework or criteria for implementing the findings from the assessment in Section 3, which could result in a lack of actionable outcomes.
There is an absence of oversight or independent review of the assessments and strategy development (Sections 3 and 4), which may compromise objectivity and increase the risk of conflicts of interest.
The language used in the bill can be overly complex, particularly in Section 3, which may make it challenging for individuals unfamiliar with legislative terminology to understand.
The exclusion of consultations under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Section 4) might limit transparency and public oversight, affecting the credibility of the consultation process.
Section 4's timeline for strategy development and implementation may be too aggressive, considering the complexity of tasks and the need for broad consultation and collaboration.
The scope of consultation with 'nongovernmental experts' in Section 4 is not well-defined, leading to potential biases in the selection process.
The bill fails to specify detailed criteria or guidelines for the cost-benefit analysis in Section 4, potentially leading to an ineffective evaluation process.
The terminology 'significant real or personal property' in Section 5 is somewhat vague, creating ambiguity about what properties need protection.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the legislation, specifying that it may be referred to as the “Border Weather Resiliency Act of 2024.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for key terms in a legislative act, including which congressional committees are considered appropriate, the roles of the Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Secretary of Homeland Security, and what constitutes hazardous weather and water events, such as severe storms and other natural disasters.
3. Assessment of impacts of hazardous weather and water events on U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel, technology, and infrastructure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires an assessment of how hazardous weather and water events over the past five years have affected U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It examines impacts on their duties, personnel safety, technology, infrastructure, and uniforms. A report with the assessment results and response efforts must be submitted to Congress within 180 days of the Act's enactment.
4. Strategy to address impacts of hazardous weather and water events Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a strategy that the Secretary of Homeland Security must create within a year to reduce the impact of severe weather and water events on U.S. Customs and Border Protection operations, including the well-being of personnel and individuals, as well as the integrity of border security technology and infrastructure. This strategy involves consultations with various government and tribal entities and experts, requires a cost-benefit analysis, and must be implemented within a year after submission, with semiannual progress reports for five years.
5. Safety protocols to protect U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel, technology, and infrastructure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Commissioner to develop safety protocols within one year to protect U.S. Customs and Border Protection employees and operations from hazardous weather and water events. These protocols aim to help the agency perform its duties, safeguard the health and well-being of personnel and inspected individuals, and ensure the continued function of their technology and equipment.