Overview

Title

To require agencies to use information and communications technology products obtained from original equipment manufacturers or authorized resellers, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 4651 wants to make sure that when the government buys things like computers and phones, they get them from the people who actually make them or from stores that are allowed to sell them. This is to keep everything safe and secure, but they have to get permission if they need to buy from somewhere else for really important reasons.

Summary AI

S. 4651, known as the “Securing America’s Federal Equipment in Supply Chains Act” or the “SAFE Supply Chains Act,” is a bill aimed at ensuring that U.S. federal agencies only use information and communications technology (ICT) products purchased from original equipment manufacturers or authorized resellers. The bill prohibits agencies from procuring ICT products from unauthorized sources, unless a waiver is granted for reasons such as national security or scientific research. It also requires agencies to report to Congress on any waivers granted and on efforts to minimize such waivers, ensuring compliance with the procurement restrictions. Furthermore, no new funds are allocated for implementing this bill, and it goes into effect one year after enactment.

Published

2024-12-19
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-12-19
Package ID: BILLS-118s4651rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
2,466
Pages:
14
Sentences:
42

Language

Nouns: 709
Verbs: 193
Adjectives: 111
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 91
Entities: 95

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.21
Average Sentence Length:
58.71
Token Entropy:
5.04
Readability (ARI):
31.05

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "Securing America’s Federal Equipment in Supply Chains Act" or the "SAFE Supply Chains Act," aims to regulate how U.S. government agencies procure and utilize information and communications technology (ICT) products. The primary objective is to ensure that these agencies only purchase ICT products from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) or authorized resellers, thereby aiming to enhance security and integrity in federal supply chains.

General Summary

This legislation mandates that government agencies can only source ICT products from OEMs or their authorized resellers, unless they obtain a waiver. Such waivers are permitted only if necessary for national security, scientifically valid research, or to avoid jeopardizing mission-critical functions. Furthermore, the bill requires that reports detailing these waivers be submitted to Congress annually, for up to six years after the enactment of the law. However, it also stipulates that no new funds are allocated for enacting these regulations, implying that agencies must implement them within existing budgets.

Significant Issues

One pressing issue with the bill is the ambiguity surrounding the definition of a "covered product." The exclusion of "other software" is not clearly defined, potentially leading to varied interpretations among agencies. Additionally, the waiver provision may be subject to exploitation, as it lacks a detailed process for evaluating the need for a waiver. This could result in inconsistent application across different agencies. The reliance on contracts to define "authorized resellers" could pose barriers to new entrants, limiting market competition.

The bill also specifies that reports to Congress will begin only after one year and occur annually, which may hinder timely oversight and accountability. Moreover, while limiting procurement to OEMs and authorized resellers could strengthen supply chain security, it also risks narrowing the pool of potential suppliers and raising costs.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the bill's impact may manifest in increased confidence that federal agencies are using secure and reliable technology. This, in turn, could enhance public trust in government operations. However, the decision to limit procurement exclusively to select entities could lead to higher costs for taxpayers if prices for ICT products rise due to reduced competition.

Impact on Stakeholders

Government Agencies: By mandating procurement from OEMs or authorized resellers, agencies may face additional challenges in sourcing products and might incur higher costs. The prohibition on using non-authorized resellers may necessitate adjustments in procurement strategies and could lead to resource strains due to the "No new funds" clause.

Manufacturers and Resellers: OEMs and authorized resellers stand to benefit significantly, as they may become preferred or exclusive providers for government contracts, potentially increasing their market share and influence. On the flip side, other resellers might find themselves excluded from federal contracts, affecting their business prospects.

Researchers: Entities conducting scientifically valid research might be directly affected by the waiver provisions. While the bill allows for waivers to facilitate research, the lack of clear criteria or processes for granting these waivers introduces uncertainty.

Congress and Oversight Bodies: Congress will have the responsibility to oversee the implementation of this legislation through the reports submitted by the Office of Management and Budget. The effectiveness of this oversight will hinge on the clarity and transparency of the reporting process.

Overall, while the SAFE Supply Chains Act aims to bolster security within federal technology procurement, its success will largely depend on how well ambiguities within the bill are resolved and whether the waiver system maintains its integrity.

Issues

  • The definition of 'covered product' in Section 2(a)(4) may be ambiguous due to the exclusion of 'other software' and the lack of clear criteria for what constitutes 'other software.' This ambiguity could lead to differing interpretations and inconsistent application across agencies.

  • The waiver provision in Section 2(c) could be subject to misuse, as it allows exceptions for national security or scientifically valid research without defining a clear process or criteria for assessing these interests. This may lead to inconsistent application and potential exploitation of the waiver system.

  • The terms 'authorized reseller' and 'original equipment manufacturer' under Section 2(a)(3) and Section 2(a)(7) rely heavily on contractual definitions, which could potentially create barriers for new market entrants and limit competition.

  • The requirement for reports to Congress as specified in Section 2(d) and Section 2(e), only after a year and annually thereafter, may result in delayed oversight and accountability, hindering real-time application and effectiveness of the legislation.

  • Section 2(b) prohibits procurement from non-authorized resellers or manufacturers, potentially narrowing the supply chain and affecting agencies' ability to source the best products at competitive prices.

  • The language regarding 'appropriate congressional committees' in Section 2(a)(2) could limit oversight scope without clear justification, potentially reducing accountability.

  • The requirement of 'No new funds' under Section 2(f) may create financial constraints for agencies, limiting their ability to implement the bill without additional appropriations.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the bill states the official short title as the "Securing America’s Federal Equipment in Supply Chains Act" or the "SAFE Supply Chains Act".

2. Agency use of IT products Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines rules for U.S. government agencies on buying and using certain information and communications technology products. Agencies can only purchase these products from original manufacturers or authorized resellers, with exceptions allowed for national security, valid research, or critical functions through a formal waiver process. Reports must be submitted to Congress detailing these waivers annually for six years.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill introduces the official name of the legislation, which is the “Securing America’s Federal Equipment Supply Chains Act” or the “SAFE Supply Chains Act.”

2. Agency use of IT products Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that government agencies can only purchase IT products from original manufacturers or their authorized resellers, unless a waiver is issued for specific research or mission-critical purposes. It also requires agencies to report to Congress about any waivers issued and aims to limit these waivers to ensure compliance with the purchasing rules, without needing new funds.