Overview
Title
To improve wildfire mitigation, management, and recovery, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The EMBER Act is like a big plan to help stop wildfires and clean up after them. It wants to make it easier for people to work together, including those living on Native American lands, and encourages using things like wood in smart ways to prevent fires.
Summary AI
S. 4628, also known as the "Enhancing Mitigation and Building Effective Resilience Act" or the "EMBER Act," aims to improve wildfire mitigation, management, and recovery in the United States. It allows federal agencies to reduce or waive local matching fund requirements for wildfire-related projects, supports inventory and development of wood processing facilities, and promotes small business and biomass utilization. The bill also focuses on workforce needs, incident recovery, and greater Tribal involvement in wildfire response. Additionally, it includes provisions for renewable fuel standards, grazing management, and the creation of a wildfire subcommittee, as well as training for local entities to handle wildfires effectively.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The "Enhancing Mitigation and Building Effective Resilience Act," also known as the "EMBER Act," addresses wildfire mitigation, management, and recovery efforts in the United States. This bill, introduced in the 118th Congress, aims to strengthen strategies to manage and reduce wildfire risks effectively. The proposed legislation includes a broad array of measures to support state, local, tribal entities, and small businesses in wildfire management. These measures range from waiving cost-sharing requirements for mitigation projects to promoting the utilization of wood processing and biomass byproducts. Additionally, the bill touches on renewable fuel initiatives, workforce development, emergency response protocols, and
Issues
The renewable fuel standard program in Section 2(e) introduces complex regulatory changes favoring certain industries but lacks a detailed cost-benefit analysis, which might lead to disproportionate benefits for specific stakeholders.
The provision in Section 2(a) on State, local, and tribal matching funds waiver lacks specific eligibility criteria, risking inconsistent application and potential misuse of funds.
Section 2(c) does not specify environmental safeguards for the land-for-wood processing program, which could lead to the misuse of public land and unintended environmental consequences.
The requirement for covered agencies in Section 2(l) to expedite funding post-wildfire to less than 90 days may lead to hasty decisions and inefficient spending without adequate checks.
Section 2(q) on Bureau of Land Management land transfers may be seen as preferential treatment without clear eligibility guidelines or impact assessments, raising concerns over equitable treatment.
Section 2(s) on the formation of a panel to study Tribal inclusion lacks specifications on financing and oversight mechanisms, possibly leading to accountability issues.
The emergency watershed protection measure amendments in Section 2(k) allow cross-boundary funding without clearly defining how jurisdictional disputes will be resolved, potentially leading to conflicts.
The lack of clear definitions for 'biomass utilization' methodologies in Section 2(g) could result in diverse interpretations and possible overreach in implementations.
The language regarding grazing permits in Section 2(h) is technical and complex, which might hinder accessibility and understanding for stakeholders unfamiliar with regulatory language.
Section 2(x) on performance metrics revisions lacks specifics on standardization, leading to possible variations in interpretation and implementation that could affect efficacy and accountability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces the official short title of the legislation, which is called the "Enhancing Mitigation and Building Effective Resilience Act" or the "EMBER Act."
2. Wildfire mitigation, management, and recovery Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes various strategies for managing and reducing the risks of wildfires, including waiving cost-sharing for state and local projects, inventorying wood processing facilities, utilizing federal lands for wood processing, and supporting small businesses that handle wildfire byproducts. It also outlines measures for renewable fuel programs, workforce enhancement, incident recovery, emergency water protection, tribal participation, and the establishment of a wildfire subcommittee to improve disaster response and resilience.