Overview
Title
To revise sections 552, 1461, and 1462 of title 18, United States Code, and section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1305), and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 4619, called the "Stop Comstock Act," tries to change some old, confusing rules about what kind of materials are okay to use or share by removing words like "indecent" and "immoral" to make the rules clearer and fairer.
Summary AI
S. 4619, known as the "Stop Comstock Act," aims to amend certain sections of title 18 of the United States Code and the Tariff Act of 1930. The bill addresses the removal of terms related to "indecency" and "immorality," particularly in sections concerning obscene materials and content related to abortion. It seeks to update legal definitions and language to clarify the regulation of obscene materials while removing outdated terminology from earlier legislation. The legislation was introduced in the Senate by a group of senators and has been referred to the Committee on the Judiciary for further consideration.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Stop Comstock Act" (S. 4619), seeks to amend sections of title 18 of the United States Code and the Tariff Act of 1930. The bill primarily focuses on revising the language related to obscene materials, removing terms such as "indecent" and "immoral" from these legal texts. These changes aim to update legal terminology and clarify the legal framework governing materials deemed obscene.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the key issues with this bill lies in the lack of a clear definition for what constitutes "obscene materials." This ambiguity can lead to varying interpretations across different legal jurisdictions, which might result in legal challenges due to inconsistent applications of the law. Additionally, by removing references to "indecent" and "immoral" materials without offering new definitions or guidelines, the bill could inadvertently create loopholes for content that is offensive or harmful but not explicitly classified as obscene.
Further compounding these issues is the substantial deletion of existing legislative text without providing explanations or context. This lack of transparency might make it challenging for stakeholders and the public to fully grasp the intentions and practical implications of the bill. Also, specific legal references, like "section 230(f)(2)," appear without detailed explanations, which could hinder understanding for those not well-versed in legal statutes.
Potential Public Impact
The proposed changes could have sweeping implications for how obscene materials are regulated in the United States. For the general public, this legislation may affect the availability and control of certain types of content. The reduction in the broad categorization of offensive materials to solely "obscene" might limit the scope of what is regulated, potentially leading to greater availability of content previously deemed indecent or immoral.
On the flip side, for those advocating for freedom of expression, this shift may be seen as a positive step towards reducing censorship, as it potentially narrows the scope of content regulation. However, the lack of clear definitions can create uncertainty and invite legal battles, which can complicate the enforcement of these laws.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For content creators and distributors, the changes could represent a double-edged sword. While they may enjoy increased liberties due to the narrowed language of the law, the lack of clarity could also spawn confusion over compliance, increasing the risk of lawsuits or regulatory action interpreted under varying legal lenses.
Legal professionals and lawmakers may face challenges in interpreting and applying these laws, given the absence of clear definitions and the potential for varied judicial opinions. Additionally, groups concerned with public morality and protection may view these changes negatively, emphasizing the need for detailed standards to ensure materials that might still be harmful are adequately regulated.
In summary, while the "Stop Comstock Act" sets out to refine and update legal standards regarding obscene materials, it raises important questions and challenges around definitions, legal consistency, and potential impacts on free speech and public decency. Stakeholders and the general public would benefit from a more detailed articulation of terms and a transparent presentation of the bill's objectives and rationale.
Issues
The lack of a clear definition for 'obscene materials' in Section 2 may lead to legal ambiguity and inconsistency in the application of the law. This vagueness could result in legal challenges, as interpretations may vary widely in different jurisdictions.
The removal of references to 'indecent' and 'immoral' materials in Section 2 without providing alternative definitions leaves potential loopholes for materials that are harmful or offensive but do not meet the undefined threshold of 'obscene'. This could undermine the intent of the legislation and public protection.
The amendments in Section 2 include significant deletions from existing law without offering context or rationale, potentially reducing transparency and leaving stakeholders unclear about the intentions and implications of the bill.
The use of a specific legal reference, such as 'section 230(f)(2)' in the amendments to Section 1462 without further explanation might be confusing to those unfamiliar with the specific legal texts, creating barriers to understanding and accessibility.
The bill title, 'Stop Comstock Act' as mentioned in Section 1, may raise political and ethical debates given the historical context of Comstock laws and the implications for discussions around morality, censorship, and freedom of expression.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the Act will be called the "Stop Comstock Act."
2. Obscene materials Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section changes the law to remove references to "indecent" materials and focuses solely on "obscene" materials in certain parts of the United States Code and the Tariff Act of 1930. It updates how these materials are described and handled, primarily targeting the language used and simplifying the legal text by removing outdated or unnecessary terms.