Overview
Title
To improve the structure of the Federal Pell Grant program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 4595 is like a plan to make college scholarships called Pell Grants bigger and last longer, so more kids can go to school, including those who are dreamers. It wants to make sure these scholarships keep up with the cost of things over time, but some people worry it might cost too much money.
Summary AI
S. 4595, known as the “Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act of 2024,” aims to enhance the Federal Pell Grant program in several ways. The bill proposes making Pell Grants fully mandatory with increases aligned with inflation, doubling their maximum amounts over the next few years, and expanding eligibility to include dreamer students. It also calls for the restoration of previous eligibility cuts, increased grants for recipients of means-tested benefits, and adjustments to financial aid penalties based on academic progress. Additionally, it suggests allowing students who face hardship to regain eligibility and extends the period of Pell Grant eligibility from 12 to 18 semesters.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act of 2024 is a proposed legislative measure aimed at enhancing the Federal Pell Grant program, a crucial component of student financial aid in the United States. This bill intends to make significant changes to increase the amount of Pell Grant funding available to students, ensure its longevity and responsiveness to economic conditions, and expand eligibility to include "Dreamer" students—those who came to the U.S. as children and meet certain criteria.
General Summary
At its core, this bill proposes to double the Pell Grant amounts distributed to students over a series of years, ultimately stabilizing these grants through mandatory funding adjusted by inflation. This funding mechanism aims to protect the grant program from future fiscal uncertainties and ensure stable support for students pursuing higher education. Additionally, the bill seeks to extend funding availability from 12 semesters to 18, giving students more time to complete their education. Another notable element is the inclusion of Dreamer students in federal aid eligibility, broadening access to student financial assistance for immigrant populations.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise with the proposed changes. One major concern is the potential for unsustainable federal spending. Tying the grants to inflation without clear spending limits could result in ballooning costs, especially in high-inflation periods. The bill also proposes complications around eligibility and distribution criteria, particularly concerning students with a student aid index below zero, which lacks clear explanation and could lead to misapplications or inequities. Regarding Dreamer students, the proposal to include them in federal aid eligibility is based on complex and potentially evolving immigration policies, which could lead to legal challenges or inconsistent application.
Furthermore, the bill's provisions for the automatic appropriation of funds ("such sums as may be necessary") do not include specific oversight mechanisms, potentially opening the door to unchecked spending. The allowance for "resets" of satisfactory academic performance, enabling students to regain eligibility multiple times, could become costly without ensuring students make real academic progress. Lastly, the transitional aspects and broad authority given to the Secretary of Education lack specific guidelines, potentially leading to implementation inconsistencies.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill represents a significant investment in higher education, which could increase college affordability and thus potentially amplify educational attainment across socio-economic backgrounds. By doubling the Pell Grant amounts and ensuring their growth with inflation, many students, especially those from underserved communities, might face fewer financial barriers.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For students, notably those from low-income or minority backgrounds, this bill promises increased access to education. The expanded eligibility criteria and increased grant amounts could relieve financial burdens, opening doors to higher education. Dreamer students stand to gain significant benefits if included in federal aid eligibility, potentially accessing financial resources that were previously unavailable.
Institutions of higher education might see increased enrollment as education becomes more financially feasible, though they might also face increased administrative burdens due to the detailed reporting and evaluation requirements introduced by the bill. Policymakers might grapple with budgeting concerns given the lack of fiscal constraints on grant spending.
In conclusion, while the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act of 2024 aims to democratize access to higher education through enhanced funding and eligibility, it also prompts questions about sustainable federal spending and efficient implementation of its wide-reaching measures. Understanding the balance of potential benefits against fiscal and operational challenges remains crucial for the public and policymakers alike.
Financial Assessment
The "Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act of 2024," as encapsulated in S. 4595, presents several financial references and implications that merit close examination. These financial elements are crucial to understanding the potential impacts and challenges of the bill's implementation.
Increase in Pell Grant Amounts
The bill proposes a significant increase in the total maximum Federal Pell Grant awards over several years. Specifically, the amounts are scheduled to rise to $10,000 for the 2025–2026 award year, with annual increases reaching $14,000 by the 2029–2030 award year. From 2030–2031 onwards, these grants will further adjust annually based on an "adjustment percentage" tied to inflation. This aspect aims to make higher education more accessible by enhancing student aid, but it also raises concerns identified in the issues section regarding potential unsustainable federal spending. The adjustment tied to the Consumer Price Index could indeed amplify federal financial obligations, particularly in times of high inflation, leading to budgetary strain without clear spending limits or oversight mechanisms in place.
Mandatory Funding and Automatic Appropriations
The bill transitions the Federal Pell Grant program to a fully mandatory program, stating that "such sums as may be necessary" will be appropriated to ensure the grants' availability. This automatic appropriation, while potentially beneficial for ensuring continuous support for students, lacks stringent oversight measures, raising concerns about unchecked fiscal expenditures. This component could contribute to a lack of accountability in federal spending, as it does not specify limits or include a comprehensive plan for managing the required funds.
Means-Tested Benefits and Student Aid
The legislation allows for students with a student aid index of less than zero to receive additional grant awards. More specifically, the bill includes a provision for these students to receive Federal Pell Grant amounts exceeding the maximum grant value by the amount their aid index is negative. Furthermore, the bill mentions setting a student aid index equal to –$1,500 for applicants and their families who received means-tested federal benefits within two years. The financial allocations here are intended to provide greater support to low-income students but have been flagged in the issues as potentially lacking clarity and fairness, which might complicate execution and fiscal oversight.
Restoration and Extension of Eligibility
Additionally, the bill seeks to restore Pell Grant eligibility from 12 to 18 semesters. This extension aims to assist students who require more time to complete their education, potentially due to hardships. However, it could significantly escalate federal spending, especially if students frequently require additional funding without substantial progress, as noted in the issues section.
Conclusion
Overall, while the bill's financial components aim to increase accessibility to higher education and reduce economic barriers for students, the proposed changes to funding mechanisms and eligibility extensions bring about serious considerations regarding fiscal sustainability and oversight. Addressing these concerns will require careful monitoring and potentially additional safeguards to ensure that the intended benefits are realized without compromising fiscal responsibility.
Issues
The proposal to make the Federal Pell Grant program a fully mandatory program with automatic annual increases tied to inflation without clear spending limits (Section 4) could lead to unsustainable federal spending, especially during periods of high inflation.
The language used to describe eligibility for increased Federal Pell Grants for students with a student aid index of less than zero (Section 5) lacks clarity, which could result in confusion or misapplication and raises concerns about fairness and proper fiscal oversight.
The amendment to increase the total semesters of Federal Pell Grant eligibility from 12 to 18 (Section 7) may significantly increase federal spending, with insufficient explanation or justification provided for this change.
The definition of a 'Dreamer student' (Section 6) is complex and based on potentially shifting immigration policies, which may lead to legal challenges or inconsistencies in application.
The automatic appropriation of funds for Federal Pell Grants (Section 4), described as 'such sums as may be necessary,' lacks specific oversight mechanisms, potentially leading to unchecked fiscal expenditure.
The provision allowing for resets of satisfactory academic progress (Section 8) could lead to potential wasteful spending if students frequently requalify without making actual academic progress.
The lack of detailed implementation guidelines and criteria in the provisions aimed at expanding access to underserved students (Section 2) raises concerns about accountability and effective targeting of resources.
The unspecified steps the Secretary of Education is authorized to take for implementing the bill's amendments (Section 10) may lead to broad and potentially inconsistent interpretations, affecting the orderly rollout of the bill's provisions.
The references to amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965 throughout the bill may create difficulties for stakeholders without access to the full context of the original Act, hindering full comprehension of the proposed changes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act of 2024 is the official name by which this new law can be referred to.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that the Federal Pell Grant program is essential for helping many U.S. students afford higher education, especially those from underserved communities, and recommends making the program fully mandatory and growth-adjusted for inflation to ensure its stability and continued support for students now and in the future.
3. Table of contents; references Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes the table of contents for a congressional act, listing various sections including those about Federal Pell Grants and financial aid eligibility. It also specifies that references to amendments or repeals in this act are related to provisions from the Higher Education Act of 1965.
4. Doubling Federal Pell Grants and providing all Federal Pell Grants through mandatory funding Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes increasing the maximum Federal Pell Grant amounts each year from $10,000 in 2025-2026 up to $14,000 in 2029-2030, with further adjustments for inflation starting in 2030. It also ensures mandatory funding for these grants and removes some outdated sections, while making minor amendments to improve related student loan terms and support services.
Money References
- (a) Amount of minimum Federal Pell Grants.—Section 401 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(2)(F), by striking “10 percent” and inserting “5 percent”; (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by striking “paragraph (5)(A)” and inserting “paragraph (5)”; (B) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following: “(5) TOTAL MAXIMUM FEDERAL PELL GRANT.— “(A) AWARD YEAR 2025–2026.—For award year 2025–2026, the total maximum Federal Pell Grant award shall be $10,000. “(B) AWARD YEAR 2026–2027.—For award year 2026–2027, the total maximum Federal Pell Grant award shall be $11,000. “(C) AWARD YEAR 2027–2028.—For award year 2027–2028, the total maximum Federal Pell Grant award shall be $12,000.
- “(D) AWARD YEAR 2028–2029.—For award year 2028–2029, the total maximum Federal Pell Grant award shall be $13,000.
- , the total maximum Federal Pell Grant award shall be $14,000.
- “(F) AWARD YEAR 2030–2031 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS.—For award year 2030–2031, and each subsequent award year, the total maximum Federal Pell Grant award shall be $14,000— “(i) increased by the adjustment percentage for the award year for which the amount under this subparagraph is being determined; and “(ii) rounded to the nearest $50
5. Providing increased Federal Pell Grants and other assistance for recipients of means-tested benefits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to the Federal Pell Grant program, allowing students with a negative student aid index to receive grants exceeding the typical maximum amount. Additionally, it sets a special student aid index of -$1,500 for recipients of means-tested benefits when calculating financial aid.
Money References
- (a) Increased amount of maximum Federal Pell Grants for students with negative student aid indexes.—Section 401(b)(1) (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(1)), as amended by section 4 of this Act, is further amended— (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking “A student” and inserting “Except in the case of a student with a student aid index of less than zero, a student”; (B) by striking clause (i); and (C) by redesignating clauses (ii) and (iii) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) through (E) as subparagraphs (C) through (F), respectively; (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following: “(B) A student with a student aid index of less than zero shall be eligible for a Federal Pell Grant award that exceeds the total maximum Federal Pell Grant by an amount equal to the amount by which the student’s student aid index is less than zero.”; (4) in subparagraph (C), as redesignated by paragraph (2)— (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking “subparagraph (A) for an academic year,” and inserting “subparagraph (A), or an increased Federal Pell Grant under subparagraph (B), for an academic year,”; and (B) in clause (ii), by striking “, except that a student aid index of less than zero shall be considered to be zero for the purposes of this clause”; (5) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking “(A) or (B)” and inserting “(A), (B), or (C)”; (6) in subparagraph (E), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by inserting “or an increased Federal Pell Grant under subparagraph (B)” after “subparagraph (A)”; or (7) in subparagraph (F), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking “or a minimum Federal Pell Grant under subparagraph (C)” and inserting “an increased Federal Pell Grant under subparagraph (B), or a minimum Federal Pell Grant under subparagraph (D)”. (b) Special student aid index rule for recipients of means-Tested benefits.—Section 473 (20 U.S.C. 1087mm) is amended by adding at the end the following: “(d) Special rule for means-Tested benefit recipients.—Notwithstanding subsection (b), for an applicant (or, as applicable, an applicant and spouse, or an applicant’s parents) who, at any time during the previous 2 -year period, received a benefit under a means-tested Federal benefit program, as defined in section 479(b)(4)(H), (or whose parent or spouse received such a benefit, as applicable), the Secretary shall for the purposes of this title consider the student aid index as equal to –$1,500 for the applicant.”. ---
6. Federal aid eligibility for dreamer students Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section updates the eligibility for federal aid to include "Dreamer students," which refers to individuals who came to the U.S. as children, meet certain educational or military service requirements, and were eligible for deferred action under specific Department of Homeland Security memorandums. Additionally, the Secretary is instructed to create rules that might waive the age requirement for these individuals in cases of compelling hardship.
7. Restoring the total semesters of Federal Pell Grant eligibility Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section proposes to change the Federal Pell Grant eligibility from a maximum of 12 semesters to 18 semesters, allowing students more time to use their grant funds.
8. Reducing financial aid penalties from satisfactory academic progress determinations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Higher Education Act to define terms and establish rules regarding how students maintain their eligibility for financial aid based on their academic progress. It provides guidelines for evaluating and notifying students about their progress, explains the process for students to regain eligibility, and requires schools to inform students clearly about academic requirements for keeping financial aid.
9. Conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes corrections to references in a federal law, specifically changing how certain sections are cited, such as replacing references to different parts of section 401 so that they correctly point to the updated section numbers in the law.
10. Effective date Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act and its changes to the Higher Education Act of 1965 will become effective on July 1, 2025, and apply to the 2025–2026 award year and every year after that. It also gives the Secretary of Education the power to take necessary actions before this date to ensure a smooth transition.