Overview
Title
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit national securities exchanges from listing securities issued by certain entities, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to stop certain companies that do bad things, like using forced labor in China, from being allowed to sell stocks on big American stock markets. It tells important people to make a list of these bad companies and to keep everyone in the government informed.
Summary AI
The bill S. 4590, also known as the "Timely Rejection of Adversarial and Dangerous Enterprises and Securing American Financial Exchanges Act" or the "TRADE SAFE Act," seeks to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Its main objective is to prevent national securities exchanges from listing securities issued by entities that are linked to forced labor in China's Xinjiang region, military ties with China, or providing certain restricted communication services. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will conduct a study to identify which issuers are currently listed on exchanges, and the President must notify Congress if any entities are removed from specified lists related to these restrictions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, identified as S. 4590 in the 118th Congress, seeks to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Titled the "Timely Rejection of Adversarial and Dangerous Enterprises and Securing American Financial Exchanges Act," or the "TRADE SAFE Act," the bill's primary goal is to prevent national securities exchanges in the United States from listing securities from certain foreign entities. Specifically, it targets entities associated with forced labor in the Xinjiang region of China, identified as Chinese military companies, or linked to producing specific communication equipment. Additionally, the bill mandates a study and report to identify the presence of such entities' securities in American exchanges.
Significant Issues
One of the bill's primary concerns is the ambiguity regarding the effective implementation of its listing prohibitions. The legislation relies on existing lists, which could change over time, potentially leading to challenges in applying the rules consistently. Another notable issue is a potential loophole that allows securities already listed before the effective date to remain unaffected, potentially undermining the bill's intended impact.
Furthermore, the effective date of the bill is 180 days post-enactment, which might delay the desired protective actions against certain entities. The complex language and numerous references to existing laws also make the bill difficult for non-specialists to understand, posing a risk of misinterpretation.
In Section 3, the bill requires notifying Congress about changes in specified lists but lacks detail on the criteria for these changes or consequences if the notification timeline is not followed.
Broad Impact on the Public
The bill aims to enhance national security by restricting potentially harmful foreign entities from accessing U.S. financial markets. By addressing issues of forced labor and military affiliations, the legislation seeks to protect American values and interests. For the general public, this means an attempt to ensure that investments align with national security interests and ethical labor practices.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Investors and Financial Markets: For investors, this bill could mean more stringent regulatory standards and a potential reshuffling of listed securities, impacting investment portfolios. The exclusions of certain foreign entities could reduce market risks associated with unethical practices but might also limit investment opportunities in specific international sectors.
U.S. Companies and Exchanges: National securities exchanges would need to adjust their listing criteria and potentially delist certain securities. This could involve administrative challenges and adjustment costs as exchanges ensure compliance with the new regulations.
Foreign Entities: Those who fall under the restricted categories may face barriers to entering or remaining in the U.S. financial markets, impacting their ability to raise capital and conduct business globally.
Regulatory Bodies: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other relevant agencies would require additional resources to conduct mandated studies and implement the bill's provisions, ensuring that responsive mechanisms are in place for any updates or changes to restricted lists.
In conclusion, while the bill addresses significant national and ethical security concerns, its effectiveness depends on clear implementation strategies and comprehensive communication to stakeholders regarding its complexities and potential changes to existing regulations.
Issues
Section 2: There is potential ambiguity and lack of clarity regarding the effective implementation of prohibiting the listing of securities issued by entities linked to forced labor or Chinese military companies, relying on existing lists which may change over time. This could lead to challenges in consistently applying the rules.
Section 2: Subclause (B) of clause (11) creates a potential loophole by excluding securities already listed before the effective date, which might undermine the intent of the amendment to prohibit certain entities.
Section 2: The effective date occurs 180 days after enactment, which may delay immediate action against potentially harmful issuers and could expose investors and markets to ongoing risks.
Section 2: The language is complex and refers to multiple other acts and legal provisions, making it difficult for an average reader to understand. This complexity can lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the bill's provisions.
Section 3: There is no clarification on the criteria or process for removing entities or equipment/services from the specified lists, leading to potential ambiguity about decisions made under the bill.
Section 3: The requirement for notifying Congress 'not later than 15 days before' certain actions are taken lacks clarity on repercussions if the timing is not adhered to, potentially undermining the enforcement mechanisms.
Section 2: There is no clear mechanism outlined for updating or modifying the list of prohibited issuers in the future as global circumstances change, which could hinder the bill's ability to remain relevant and effective.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section specifies that the law can be referred to as the "Timely Rejection of Adversarial and Dangerous Enterprises and Securing American Financial Exchanges Act" or simply the "TRADE SAFE Act."
2. National securities exchanges Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Securities Exchange Act prohibits national securities exchanges from listing securities of entities that have been associated with certain restricted lists, such as those involving forced labor or Chinese military companies, within the past three years. Additionally, a study is mandated to identify which of these entities have securities already listed, with a report to be made to Congress within 180 days of the Act’s enactment.
3. Congressional notification Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The President is required to inform Congress at least 15 days in advance before removing an entity from specific regulatory lists, including those under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.