Overview
Title
To repeal certain provisions of the CHIPS Act of 2022 and the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, to limit Federal mandates imposed on entities seeking Federal funds, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 4568 is a bill that wants to stop some parts of a law that encouraged diversity, climate research, and helped students learn science. It also wants to make sure that the government doesn't force companies to do things like hire a diverse group of people or focus on climate change when they ask for government money.
Summary AI
S. 4568, titled the "CHIPS Improvement Act," proposes to repeal specific provisions from the CHIPS Act of 2022 and the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act. The bill aims to remove various requirements related to diversity, education outreach, geographic diversity, climate change research, and more. Additionally, it seeks to restrict federal agencies from imposing certain mandates on entities seeking federal funding, such as hiring diverse workforces or considering climate change impacts.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, formally known as S. 4568, aims to repeal specific provisions of the CHIPS Act of 2022 and related legislation, while also restricting federal mandates on entities seeking federal funds. This legislation, introduced in the Senate, chiefly addresses the elimination of certain requirements and roles within federal programs, notably those linked to diversity, STEM education, and environmental initiatives.
General Summary
The bill is divided into two main sections: Title I focuses on repeals, and Title II imposes limitations on federal mandates. Title I consists of repealing various requirements from previous acts that mandated diversity and inclusion efforts, educational outreach, climate change research, and programs designed to enhance participation in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields. It also abolishes roles such as the NSF Chief Diversity Officer. Title II restricts the ability of federal agencies to require entities seeking federal funds to implement certain workforce and environmental policies.
Significant Issues
There are several notable issues associated with the bill:
Diversity and Inclusion: Many sections propose repealing programs and positions focused on enhancing diversity and inclusion in workforce and education settings, such as diversity in technology research and STEM fields for women and minorities. This raises concerns about the federal commitment to diversity.
STEM and Education: Removing programs that aim to expand opportunities in STEM fields could potentially reduce educational and employment growth, especially among underrepresented groups.
Climate Change and Environment: Repealing authorizations for climate change research may hinder progress towards addressing environmental issues.
Federal Mandates: Constraints on federal mandates related to workforce diversity and environmental policies might reverse progress in these areas, raising concerns about the potential impact on social equity and environmental protection.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, the bill's broad strokes may lead to reduced support for diversity and inclusion in technology and education. Communities that benefitted from these programs could face decreased opportunities for federal support, potentially widening existing gaps in representation and equity. Additionally, the curtailment of climate change research and environmental planning requirements could negatively affect public sentiment about national commitment to sustainability and ecological protection.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders in academia and technology fields, the repeal of diversity programs and the NSF Chief Diversity Officer position may pose challenges in building inclusive work and learning environments. Educators and students in STEM fields, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds, might experience reduced access to resources and support.
Environmental organizations and advocates could view the repeal of climate change research as a setback in advancing environmental science and public policy, potentially weakening efforts to address pressing ecological concerns.
Finally, organizations and companies seeking federal funds might find some relief from reduced compliance burdens, as they would no longer be required to adhere to specific federal mandates related to workforce diversity and environmental impacts. However, this relief could come at the cost of backtracking on social progress made through inclusive and sustainable practices.
In summary, while the bill may streamline certain processes for federal funding, it also risks undermining significant progress made in diversity, STEM education, and environmental stewardship. Stakeholders and the public at large may question the rationale behind these repeals and seek assurances for continued improvements in these key areas.
Issues
The repeal of programs related to diversity and inclusion, such as Section 105 (Repeal of diversity in technology research program) and Section 107 (Repeal of program for research and dissemination to increase the participation of women and underrepresented minorities in STEM fields), raises significant ethical and legal concerns regarding the commitment to diversity and inclusion in federal programs.
The bill's focus on repealing numerous initiatives (Sections 101 to 117), particularly those supporting diversity, STEM education, and climate change research, without providing alternatives or justifications, might lead to perceptions of regressive policy-making and raise transparency concerns.
Section 108, which repeals STEM opportunities, highlights the potential negative impact on educational and employment opportunities in these critical fields, particularly for underrepresented groups.
Section 109's repeal of climate change research authorization may significantly hinder environmental and climate-related research efforts, leading to concerns about the nation's commitment to combating climate change and promoting sustainability.
Section 201's limitations on Federal mandates regarding workforce diversity, childcare, and environmental planning could reverse progress on social equity, environmental protection, and community welfare, impacting numerous stakeholders and raising ethical concerns.
The lack of rationale or explanation for the repeals throughout the bill (e.g., Sections 101-118) raises concerns about the transparency and deliberation in federal legislative processes, potentially affecting public trust.
Sections 106 and 112, involving the repeal of the NSF Chief Diversity Officer position and data collection on demographics of faculty, respectively, may impact efforts to track and improve diversity within federal science initiatives and academia, presenting significant policy evaluation challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The CHIPS Improvement Act provides a short title and lists the table of contents. Title I of the Act focuses on repealing various requirements, including those related to inclusion, education, and diversity initiatives in STEM and technology fields. Title II addresses limitations on federal mandates for entities seeking federal funding.
101. Repeal of certain requirements relating to opportunity and inclusion Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section removes specific requirements related to opportunity and inclusion from the CHIPS Act of 2022 by eliminating section 104. It also renumbers the subsequent sections to follow in sequence.
102. Repeal of requirements relating to educational outreach and support for underrepresented communities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals a part of a previous law that focused on educational outreach and support for underrepresented communities. It also updates another section of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act to how it was before that previous law was enacted.
103. Repeal of requirement relating to supporting geographic diversity in Manufacturing USA program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section discusses the removal of a rule that required the Manufacturing USA program to consider geographic diversity. Additionally, it updates another law by deleting a related part to ensure everything aligns with the removal of this requirement.
104. Repeal of requirement relating to expanding opportunities through the Manufacturing USA program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals a requirement from a previous law that aimed to enhance opportunities through the Manufacturing USA program. This means that Section 10262 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act is no longer in effect.
105. Repeal of diversity in technology research program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that a specific part of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, which is Section 10326, is no longer in effect. This means any programs or activities described under that section will not continue.
106. Repeal of NSF Chief Diversity Officer position Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section announces the removal of the position of NSF Chief Diversity Officer by repealing Section 10327 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act.
107. Repeal of program for research and dissemination to increase the participation of women and underrepresented minorities in STEM fields Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section eliminates a program that was aimed at supporting research and spreading information to boost the involvement of women and underrepresented minorities in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields.
108. Repeal of activities to expand STEM opportunities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals Section 10329 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act. It also updates the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act by removing certain subsections and renaming other subsections accordingly.
109. Repeal of climate change research authorization Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that the part of a law that allowed for climate change research, known as Section 10345 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, has been removed.
110. Repeal of requirement for National Engineering Biology Research and Development Initiative Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text explains that Section 10402 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, which created the National Engineering Biology Research and Development Initiative, has been canceled.
111. Repeal of review of Federal research awards to remove or reduce cultural and institutional barriers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
SEC. 111 of the bill repeals Section 10503 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, which previously involved reviewing federal research awards to identify and address cultural and institutional barriers.
112. Repeal of data collection on demographics of faculty Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that Section 10504 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, which involved collecting data on the demographics of faculty, has been repealed.
113. Repeal of best practices regarding cultural and institutional barriers to expanding the academic and Federal STEM workforce Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 113 of the bill repeals Section 10505 of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, which involved best practices for overcoming cultural and institutional obstacles to expanding the academic and Federal STEM workforce.
114. Repeal of required report to Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 114 of the bill repeals a specific requirement for a report to be sent to Congress, which was previously established in the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act.
115. Repeal relating to NSF TCU computer science program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals the existing NSF TCU computer science program as referenced in the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act and also removes a specific subsection from the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010.
116. Repeal relating to combating sexual harassment in science Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that Subtitle D of Title V of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, which deals with efforts to combat sexual harassment in science, is being repealed.
117. Repeal of clean energy technology university prize competition Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section explains that the clean energy technology university prize competition is being canceled. Additionally, it updates another law to reflect this cancellation by removing references to the repealed section.
118. Clerical amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes changes to the table of contents in two parts of a law. It removes and renumbers some sections in the appropriations for the Legislative Branch and in the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to keep everything up to date.
201. Limitation on Federal mandates imposed on entities seeking Federal funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section puts a restriction on federal agencies, preventing them from requiring organizations seeking federal funds to adopt certain policies related to hiring diversity, providing child and adult care, supporting community projects like housing and transportation, or addressing environmental issues and climate change. These include policies similar to those in an executive order on diversity and inclusion, creating labor agreements, and consulting with local labor organizations.