Overview

Title

To authorize the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use to award formula grants to the States to address gambling addiction, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 454 is a plan to help states take care of people who have problems with gambling by giving them some money. This money comes from certain taxes, and each state has to ask for it to get help.

Summary AI

S. 454 is a bill that aims to provide financial support to states to help address gambling addiction. It authorizes the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use to award formula grants to states based on existing allocations for substance abuse prevention, with funds being reallocated if a state does not apply. The National Institute on Drug Abuse may also award grants for research on gambling addiction, and a report on the effectiveness of these programs is required within three years. The bill outlines that a portion of certain tax revenues will be used to fund these grants from 2025 through 2034.

Published

2025-02-06
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-02-06
Package ID: BILLS-119s454is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
593
Pages:
3
Sentences:
12

Language

Nouns: 205
Verbs: 39
Adjectives: 19
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 23
Entities: 60

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.25
Average Sentence Length:
49.42
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
26.95

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the “Gambling Addiction Recovery, Investment, and Treatment Act,” aims to address gambling addiction by empowering the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use to provide formula grants to U.S. states. This bill, introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Blumenthal, seeks to facilitate state-level initiatives to combat and treat gambling addiction. Additionally, the bill authorizes the National Institute on Drug Abuse to fund research on gambling addiction, with these initiatives receiving financial backing tied to specific tax revenues.

Summary of Significant Issues

One pivotal concern is the allocation of grants based on existing ratios used for substance abuse block grants. This method does not consider the varying levels of gambling addiction across states, potentially resulting in inadequate funding for states grappling with more severe gambling issues. Additionally, the bill does not specify how states should be evaluated when applying for these grants, which could lead to inconsistencies and perceptions of unfairness in fund distribution.

Another issue arises from the retirement mechanism of the grants. If a state does not apply for funding, its share is redistributed without recalibrating the needs of other states, potentially disadvantaging those with higher demands for intervention. Concerning the research initiatives funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the bill lacks specific criteria or priorities, raising concerns about the strategic allocation of research funds that might address pressing questions about gambling addiction effectively.

The financial framework for this bill is also notably tied to tax revenues tied to gambling activities, which may fluctuate significantly based on broader economic conditions and changes in gambling behaviors. This dependency could impede consistent planning and implementation of programs due to potential volatility in available funding.

Lastly, while the bill requires a progress report after three years, it does not provide detailed strategies for measuring program success. The absence of explicit guidelines could lead to variable reporting standards and a lack of accountability.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this bill aims to have a positive impact on public health by addressing gambling addiction, which can lead to significant personal and societal challenges, including financial hardship, mental health issues, and family disruption. By allocating resources for state-level interventions and research, the bill has the potential to enhance understanding and treatment of gambling addiction, benefiting individuals struggling with this issue and reducing associated societal costs.

However, potential fluctuations in funding and inequitable distribution of resources might negatively affect the public by leading to inconsistent availability of services. States with severe gambling addiction problems may not receive the necessary support to tackle them effectively, possibly leaving affected individuals without adequate resources.

Impact on Stakeholders

For state governments, this bill represents an opportunity to obtain federal support for tackling gambling addiction, potentially leading to enhanced public health outcomes. Yet, the lack of clear application criteria and the potential for funding fluctuations pose challenges in planning and executing long-term strategies.

Organizations focusing on addiction treatment and prevention may benefit from increased funding opportunities, potentially expanding their reach and effectiveness. However, the unpredictability in funding could also hinder their ability to make long-term commitments and investments.

Research institutions stand to gain from additional funding for gambling addiction studies, yet without clear priorities or criteria, these funds may not target the most pressing issues effectively.

Overall, while the bill sets out to address a critical public health issue, the effectiveness of its implementation heavily depends on addressing significant concerns related to grant allocation processes, funding stability, and accountability measures.

Issues

  • The allocation method for grants to states, based on existing allocation ratios for substance abuse block grants, may not accurately reflect the specific needs related to gambling addiction in each state. This could result in misallocation of resources, where states with higher gambling addiction issues might receive insufficient funding. [Section 2(a)(2)]

  • The provision does not specify criteria for determining successful grant applications for states, leading to ambiguity or perceived favoritism in the allocation process. This lack of transparency could affect the equitable distribution of funds. [Section 2(a)(2)]

  • The reallocation process for funds if a State does not apply for a grant might disadvantage larger states or those with more significant gambling addiction issues, as it does not recalibrate the needs assessment. This could lead to inequitable distribution and inefficacy in addressing the core issues. [Section 2(a)(2)(B)]

  • The section authorizing research grants by the National Institute on Drug Abuse does not outline criteria or priorities, potentially resulting in ineffective allocation of funds and failure to address the most pressing research questions related to gambling addiction. [Section 2(b)]

  • The bill ties funding amounts to a percentage of revenue from a specific tax, which could lead to significant fluctuations in available funding depending on economic conditions and changes in gambling activity. This unpredictability may hinder consistent program planning and outcomes. [Section 2(d)]

  • The bill does not provide detailed guidelines on how the effectiveness of the funded programs will be measured, aside from a requirement for a report. Variances in reporting quality could lead to a lack of accountability and difficulty in assessing program success. [Section 2(c)]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section titled "Short title" states that the official name of the act is the “Gambling Addiction Recovery, Investment, and Treatment Act”.

2. Grants to address gambling addiction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section outlines grants to help tackle gambling addiction, with funds distributed to States by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and for research by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. It specifies how much money is authorized for these efforts from fiscal years 2025 to 2034, based on tax revenue and requires a progress report to Congress three years after the law is enacted.