Overview
Title
To permanently establish the E-Verify employment eligibility verification system, to mandate the use of E-Verify by all employers, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Mandatory E-Verify Act of 2024 is a plan to make sure all bosses in the U.S. use a special system called E-Verify to check if new workers are allowed to work legally, and it sets rules about this and money to help run the system. It also talks about being careful with people's personal information and making sure there is no unfairness in how bosses and workers follow the rules.
Summary AI
S. 4529, known as the "Mandatory E-Verify Act of 2024," seeks to make the E-Verify employment eligibility verification system a permanent requirement for all employers in the United States. The bill outlines a phased timeline for employers to start using E-Verify based on their size and mandates that all employers verify the work eligibility of both new and some existing employees. It introduces penalties for non-compliance and unauthorized employment, and proposes enhancements to protect against identity theft and misuse of employment records. It also includes protections and processes for individuals to self-check their eligibility status and correct erroneous information.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed Mandatory E-Verify Act of 2024 aims to overhaul the current employment verification system by permanently establishing the E-Verify program across the United States. This federal mandate requires all employers to use the E-Verify system to confirm the work eligibility of their employees. The bill outlines responsibilities for several federal departments, introduces penalties for non-compliance, and sets timelines for implementation based on employer size.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill envisions making E-Verify a permanent fixture for employment verification, necessitating its use for all employers, with phased implementation timelines depending on the number of employees. It aims to detect unauthorized workers, prevent identity theft, and ensure that only legally eligible people are hired in the U.S. workforce. The legislation delegates specific roles to the Department of Homeland Security, Social Security Administration, and others to administer and oversee the program effectively. Penalties are defined for non-compliance, and provisions are made to address fraud prevention and unauthorized document usage.
Summary of Significant Issues
Funding and Resource Allocation: The bill requires significant financial resources, allocating $200 million annually for E-Verify without detailed criteria on how these funds will be managed. There are concerns about potential wasteful spending and whether resources will be prioritized appropriately.
Implementation Timeline Complexity: The staggered implementation timeline based on employer size may result in confusion or perceived unfairness. Small businesses might face challenges in adapting to these new requirements timely.
Privacy and Data Security Concerns: Employers will need to submit employee contact information, raising potential privacy issues. The broad authority for accessing state and federal records may infringe on privacy rights, sparking concerns regarding the misuse of personal data.
Penalties and Compliance Uncertainties: The bill lacks clarity on subjective terms such as "reasonable belief" in determining violations. This ambiguity could complicate enforcement, particularly for those unfamiliar with the legal systems referenced.
Public Impact
This legislation could significantly impact employment practices across the country. For the general public, the bill's goal to crack down on unauthorized employment and identity fraud could promote job security for citizens and authorized workers. However, the approach to implementation, particularly the collection and handling of personal data, may raise privacy concerns.
Stakeholder Impact
Employers: Larger businesses may find the phased approach manageable, while smaller entities might struggle with the intricacies of compliance, potentially facing undue administrative burdens. The increased penalties for non-compliance could serve as a strong deterrent but might also be viewed as harsh, especially if there are errors within the E-Verify system.
Employees: For authorized workers, this bill could mean greater job security and fewer concerns about identity theft. However, there might be heightened anxiety about data privacy and how their personal information is handled.
Government Agencies: Agencies like the Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration will play critical roles. Enhanced coordination and clear guidelines are essential for ensuring effective implementation and safeguarding privacy.
Civil Liberties Groups: The broad access granted to government entities might raise alarms about privacy intrusions and unwarranted data collection, potentially leading to legal challenges.
In essence, while the Mandatory E-Verify Act of 2024 aims to secure the workforce by ensuring legitimate employment and protecting against fraud, it presents substantial challenges in privacy, resource allocation, and equitable enforcement, which need careful consideration to mitigate adverse public and stakeholder impacts.
Financial Assessment
In examining the financial provisions of S. 4529, the "Mandatory E-Verify Act of 2024," several key aspects emerge related to funding, appropriations, and financial implications.
Funding and Appropriations
The bill outlines a significant allocation of funds to support the permanent implementation of the E-Verify system. Specifically, $100,000,000 in unobligated funds from the general fund of the Treasury will be transferred annually to the Department of Homeland Security. Additionally, there is authorization for an extra $100,000,000 to be appropriated each fiscal year starting in 2024. This establishes a recurring financial commitment aiming to ensure adequate resources for E-Verify's operations and enhancements.
Concerns about Allocation and Oversight
The substantial annual funding for E-Verify raises several issues concerning allocation and oversight. As noted in the issues, the absence of detailed allocation criteria could lead to potential wasteful spending and financial implications. Without clear guidelines on how these funds should be specifically utilized, there is a risk of inefficient resource distribution and the possibility of less priority attention on other pressing needs.
Moreover, the issues highlight a lack of criteria for assessing the system's effectiveness and efficiency. With such significant funding involved, the absence of concrete performance measures may result in a lack of accountability to ensure that E-Verify achieves its intended purposes effectively and without misuse.
Potential Privacy Concerns Linked to Financial Provisions
The financial references indirectly relate to privacy concerns addressed in Sections 7 and 10 of the bill, which grant broad authority to Homeland Security to access various records. This raises questions about whether the funding might support initiatives that infringe on individual privacy rights, emphasizing the need for careful checks and balances in how the system and its financial backing are managed.
In conclusion, while S. 4529 establishes a solid financial foundation for the mandatory adoption of E-Verify, ensuring that funds are effectively allocated and that the program operates transparently and equitably will be crucial. Addressing these concerns can help mitigate potential financial mismanagement and uphold public trust in the system.
Issues
The proposed transition of the E-Verify system from a pilot to a permanent program involves substantial annual funding transfers without detailed allocation criteria, which raises concerns about potential wasteful spending and financial implications for prioritizing resources (Section 2).
The timeline for implementing E-Verify across various employer sizes creates complex and varied compliance requirements, potentially leading to confusion or perceived unfairness in enforcement timing among different employers (Section 3).
Concerns about privacy and data security arise from the requirement for employers to submit employee contact information and the broad authority granted to the Secretary of Homeland Security to access Federal and State records, potentially infringing on individual privacy rights (Section 7, Section 10).
There is ambiguity and lack of clarity regarding the penalties for non-compliance with E-Verify, particularly concerning subjective interpretations of 'reasonable belief' in violations and the cross-references to other laws which may prove challenging for those unfamiliar with these laws (Section 4).
The bill lacks clear criteria for assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of the permanent E-Verify system, raising concerns about accountability and oversight to ensure the system achieves its intended purpose without misuse (Section 2).
Guidance on the prevention of 'mission creep' and safeguards against unwarranted use of E-Verify for purposes beyond employment verification are deemed insufficient, risking the system being used as a de facto national ID program (Section 2).
Potential conflicts between Federal and State laws related to employment verification and the lack of a clear framework for resolving such conflicts under the preemption clause may create legal uncertainties (Section 9).
The amendments concerning penalties for unauthorized employment do not specify how 'good faith' will be assessed, leading to potential inconsistencies in penalty adjustments and enforcement actions (Section 5).
The broad language used in granting access to information for E-Verify purposes, especially concerning Federal and State cooperation, leads to concerns about the overreach of federal authority in accessing personal data (Section 10).
The provision allowing parents to suspend or limit the use of their child's Social Security number lacks detail and could lead to challenges in effective implementation and protection against identity theft (Section 12).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Mandatory E-Verify Act of 2024 sets out its own short title and provides a list of its sections, which include establishing a permanent E-Verify system, making its use mandatory for all employers, outlining penalties for non-compliance, addressing unauthorized employment, and detailing processes for using E-Verify, among other provisions aimed at preventing fraud and ensuring the protection and audit of related programs.
2. Establishment of permanent E-Verify Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text establishes a permanent E-Verify system, mandating that the Secretary of Homeland Security ensures it confirms individuals' identity and employment eligibility in the U.S. The system must be secure, protect personal information, and provide responses within specified timeframes, with specific roles and responsibilities designated to the Social Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of State, alongside provisions for funding and reporting requirements.
Money References
- — (1) TRANSFERS.—On the first day of each fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer $100,000,000 in unobligated funds from the general fund of the Treasury to the Department of Homeland Security, which shall be used to carry out E-Verify.
- (2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—In addition to the amounts transferred pursuant to paragraph (1), there are authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000, in fiscal year 2024, and in each successive fiscal year, to carry out E-Verify.
3. Mandatory E-Verify for all employers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that employers in the U.S. must use the E-Verify system to confirm the eligibility of their employees for work, with specific timelines based on the size of the employer. It also introduces provisions for agricultural workers, critical infrastructure jobs, and allows for early compliance by current or voluntary E-Verify users.
4. Penalty for failure to use E-Verify Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If a person or company does not use the E-Verify system as required by this Act, such as by not following specific rules or providing false information, it will be considered a violation of certain parts of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
5. Enhanced penalties for unauthorized employment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase penalties for employers who hire unauthorized workers and allows some penalties to be reduced if the employer acted in good faith. It also gives the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to bar repeat offenders from receiving federal contracts.
Money References
- (a) In general.—Section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a) is amended— (1) in subsection (e)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking “Attorney General” each place such term appears and inserting “Secretary of Homeland Security”; and (ii) in subparagraph (D), by striking “Service” and inserting “Department of Homeland Security”; (B) in paragraph (4)— (i) in subparagraph (A)— (I) in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting “, subject to paragraph (10),” after “in an amount”; (II) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking “not less than $250 and not more than $2,000” and inserting “not less than $2,500 and not more than $5,000”; (III) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking “not less than $2,000 and not more than $5,000” and inserting “not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000”; and (IV) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking “not less than $3,000 and not more than $10,000” and inserting “not less than $10,000 and not more than $25,000”; and (ii) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows: “(B) may require the person or entity to take appropriate remedial action.
- (C) in paragraph (5)— (i) in the paragraph heading, by striking “paperwork”; (ii) by inserting “, subject to paragraphs (10) through (12),” after “in an amount”; and (iii) by striking “$100 and not more than $1,000” and inserting “$1,000 and not more than $25,000”; and (D) by adding at the end the following: “(10) ADJUSTMENT OF PENALTY FOR GOOD FAITH VIOLATION.—The Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General may waive or reduce a civil penalty under paragraph (4)(A) (with respect to a violation of paragraph (1)(A) or (2) of subsection (a) for hiring or continuation of employment or recruitment or referral by person or entity) or a civil penalty under paragraph (5) (with respect to a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) for hiring or recruitment or referral by a person or entity) if the violator establishes that the violator acted in good faith. “(11) MITIGATION.—The size of the business shall be taken into account when assessing the level of civil money penalty under paragraph (4). “(12) AUTHORITY TO DEBAR EMPLOYERS FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that a person or entity is a repeat violator of paragraph (1)(A) or (2) of subsection (a), or is convicted of a crime under this section, such person or entity may be proposed for debarment from the receipt of Federal contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements in accordance with the debarment standards and pursuant to the debarment procedures set forth in the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
- , a rebuttable presumption is created that the person or entity has violated subsection (a)(1)(A).”; and (2) in subsection (f), by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: “(1) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—Any person or entity that engages in a pattern or practice of violations of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $30,000 for each unauthorized alien with respect to which such a violation occurs, imprisoned for not more than 18 months, or both.”. (b) Effective date.
6. E-Verify self-check Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a system that allows individuals to verify their own employment eligibility through a secure process established by the Secretary of Homeland Security, with guidance from the Social Security Commissioner. This process includes protections against misuse and enables people to contact the proper agency to update or correct their information.
7. E-Verify process Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the E-Verify process for employers in the U.S., requiring them to verify the identity and work eligibility of new hires and certain existing employees through a system maintained by the Department of Homeland Security. It specifies the documents needed for verification, the procedures in case of nonconfirmation, and the steps for reverification for individuals with limited work authorization. It also allows employers to copy documentation for compliance and limits how they can use information gathered in this process.
8. Good faith defense Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act outlines the "Good Faith Defense," allowing employers to avoid penalties for employment decisions made in reliance on provided information if they comply with certain verification requirements. However, employers must demonstrate good faith efforts to verify an employee’s identity using secure technology, and the defense does not apply if they fail to seek or obtain proper verification of work eligibility within the specified timeframes.
9. Preemption Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 274A(h)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states that this federal law overrides any state or local laws or rules that are about hiring or verifying the eligibility for employment of unauthorized immigrants, including any related fines or penalties.
10. Access to information Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the use of federal and state records for E-Verify purposes, allowing the Department of Homeland Security access to these records to prevent identity theft, fraud, and to enforce employment eligibility laws. It also mandates cooperation between federal agencies, state departments, and the Department of Homeland Security, with conditions imposed on certain federal grants to encourage states and local governments to share driver's license information for these verification purposes.
11. Fraud and misuse of documents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 11 amends a part of the U.S. Code to include documents that establish work authorization alongside identification documents, in the context of preventing fraud and misuse of these documents. This change clarifies that the law covers both types of documents, including those outlined in a specific section of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
12. Fraud prevention Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed law aims to enhance fraud prevention related to Social Security numbers. It requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to create programs to block compromised numbers, allow individuals to suspend or limit their number's use, and enable parents to restrict the use of their child's Social Security number through E-Verify systems.
13. Protection of Social Security Administration programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Homeland Security will continue to fund the Social Security Administration for its role and responsibilities regarding immigration-related tasks, as outlined in a specific section of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
14. Inspector General audits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Inspector General of the Social Security Administration to conduct audits within a year to find misuse of Social Security numbers, focusing on unauthorized work in the U.S. The results must be submitted to specific Senate and House committees and shared with federal law enforcement.
15. Recruitment, referral, and continuation of employment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes how the Immigration and Nationality Act handles recruitment, referral, and continued employment by removing the requirement that these actions are done "for a fee." It also clarifies that employers must follow specific procedures when hiring or continuing to employ individuals in the U.S., and these changes will start 6 months after the law is enacted.
16. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, several important terms are defined: “agricultural labor or services” refers to various activities related to farming and preparing agricultural products; “date of hire” is the day someone starts a job; “recruit” and “refer” involve getting someone employed, with exceptions for some organizations; and an “unauthorized alien” is someone not legally allowed to work in the U.S. according to immigration laws.