Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the advanced manufacturing production credit to include distribution transformers.
ELI5 AI
In this bill, the government wants to give a special money reward to companies that make a specific type of electrical device called a "distribution transformer." This reward is like a 10% discount on how much it costs to make them, and it’s there to help encourage companies to make more of these important devices used to keep our electricity working well.
Summary AI
S. 448, also known as the "Credit Incentives for Resilient Critical Utility Infrastructure and Transformers Act" or the "CIRCUIT Act," aims to modify the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The bill seeks to expand the advanced manufacturing production credit by including distribution transformers, allowing a tax credit equal to 10% of the production costs for these transformers. The updated provisions apply to components produced and sold 90 days after the act's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Credit Incentives for Resilient Critical Utility Infrastructure and Transformers Act" or the "CIRCUIT Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary aim is to expand the advanced manufacturing production credit to include distribution transformers. Specifically, it introduces a 10% credit for the production costs associated with these transformers. Additionally, it defines "distribution transformer" using an existing definition from the Energy Policy and Conservation Act and sets an effective date for the amendment, starting 90 days after the Act's enactment.
Significant Issues
One of the critical issues associated with this bill is the potential for favoritism towards certain manufacturers within the distribution transformer market. By expanding the manufacturing credit without clear justification, there is a concern that it might disproportionately benefit dominant companies in the sector. Furthermore, the bill relies on an external definition for "distribution transformer," which could cause confusion if interpretations vary. Additionally, there is no cap specified on the claimable amounts under this new credit provision, raising concerns about possible misuse or excessive claims. Lastly, the language complexity and the extended title might limit the public's understanding and engagement with the Act.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill's effects might be indirect but significant. By potentially encouraging the production of distribution transformers through tax credits, it could lead to enhanced infrastructure resilience. This may result in more reliable utility services, which benefits consumers by reducing outages and maintenance disruptions. However, without clear limits and a broader justification, there is a risk of unfair advantages to larger corporations, possibly stifling competition which can have downstream effects on prices and innovation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Manufacturers of distribution transformers stand to gain considerably from this bill, provided they capitalize on the tax credits. This advantage could foster innovation and investment in their operations. On the flip side, companies not focused on distribution transformers may feel slighted by the lack of incentives for other critical components, leading to perceived favoritism. Policymakers and governmental agencies might face challenges in ensuring that the incentives provided are used ethically and equitably, without misuse. If successful, the broader utility industry and infrastructure sectors may see improvements, aiding in critical service delivery and contributing to overall economic stability and growth.
Issues
The expansion of the advanced manufacturing production credit to include distribution transformers, as detailed in Section 2, could disproportionately benefit certain manufacturers dominating the transformer market, raising concerns about potential favoritism (Section 2).
There is a lack of clear justification provided in Section 2 for the specific credit expansion for distribution transformers, which might suggest preferential treatment without substantial rationale (Section 2).
The reliance on the definition of 'distribution transformer' from the Energy Policy and Conservation Act could lead to ambiguity if interpretations differ, who might benefit from or be excluded from these credits (Section 2).
There is no specified cap or limit on the amount claimable under the new provision in Section 2, which raises the potential for excessive claims and misuse of funds (Section 2).
The language used in Section 2 to outline the percentage of costs for production credits may be complex, potentially excluding individuals without tax code expertise from fully understanding or engaging with the legislation (Section 2).
The title of the act is lengthy and might not clearly convey its intentions, which can affect public understanding and awareness of the bill's objectives (Section 1).
The acronym 'CIRCUIT Act' derived from the act's title may not effectively communicate the broad implications or goals of the legislation to the public (Section 1).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states its official short title, which is the “Credit Incentives for Resilient Critical Utility Infrastructure and Transformers Act” or simply the “CIRCUIT Act.”
2. Expansion of advanced manufacturing production credit to include distribution transformers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section expands the advanced manufacturing production credit to cover distribution transformers, allowing a 10% credit for production costs. It also defines 'distribution transformer' by referencing its definition in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act and specifies that the amendments apply to components produced and sold 90 days post-enactment.