Overview

Title

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2025 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, the Intelligence Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill S. 4443 wants to set aside money to help the people in the U.S. who keep secrets to protect the country and those who worked for the secret group Air America, but there are some tricky parts like making sure they spend the money wisely and don't collect too much private information without permission.

Summary AI

The bill S. 4443 is known as the "Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025." It aims to authorize funding for the United States intelligence and intelligence-related activities for the fiscal year 2025, including the Intelligence Community Management Account and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System. The bill outlines various initiatives, reforms, and appropriations related to intelligence activities, countering foreign threats, technologies, security clearances, whistleblower protections, and other related matters. It also includes measures to strengthen oversight and improve technology adoption in the intelligence community.

Published

2024-06-03
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-06-03
Package ID: BILLS-118s4443rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
106
Words:
51,923
Pages:
264
Sentences:
952

Language

Nouns: 15,624
Verbs: 3,649
Adjectives: 2,753
Adverbs: 469
Numbers: 1,944
Entities: 2,511

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.50
Average Sentence Length:
54.54
Token Entropy:
5.82
Readability (ARI):
30.51

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025, aims to set budgetary guidelines and operational protocols for various U.S. intelligence-related activities in the upcoming fiscal year. The bill includes numerous sections targeting intelligence community reforms, countering foreign threats, workforce improvements, and technological advancements. It addresses national security concerns related to foreign entities like China and Russia, the handling of sensitive data, advancements in artificial intelligence, and the management of classified information.

General Overview of the Bill

The bill provides the framework for appropriations supporting the intelligence community. It also proposes numerous amendments to existing legislation, aiming to modernize processes and improve national security measures. Specific measures include enhancing the capabilities of the Intelligence Community Management Account and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System. It contains sections meant to bolster mechanisms against foreign adversaries by addressing threats encompassing synthetic opioid trafficking, state-sponsored ransomware, and access to sensitive U.S. technologies by foreign adversaries. Furthermore, the bill mandates specific strategies related to emerging technologies, aiming to protect the U.S. from potential foreign exploitation.

Significant Issues Highlighted

One major issue concerns the broad discretion granted to the Director of the CIA in determining "extraordinary circumstances" for treating certain injuries (Sec. 901), which lacks clear definitions and oversight. The potential overlap in duties within the Office of Economic Intelligence and Security (Sec. 312) could also lead to inefficiencies across agencies.

Additionally, privacy issues arise from sections concerning the use of sensitive commercially available information (Sec. 313), which have broad definitions and raise concerns over personal data misuse. The classification reforms (Sec. 601, 602) highlight potential risks of indefinite or inconsistent classification of sensitive information.

Further ambiguity exists in defining "qualifying service" for awards to Air America employees (Sec. 1104, 1105), potentially leading to inconsistent applications. Unlimited compensatory damages for security clearance revocation cases (Sec. 807) could impose significant financial liabilities on the government.

Broad Public Impact

The bill's provisions are aimed at strengthening national security, yet they bring forth challenges, particularly regarding privacy and civil liberties. Sections that allow for broad data collection and handling, such as those involving United States location information (Sec. 314), may infringe upon personal freedoms if adequate oversight and penalties are not established.

The management of risks linked to artificial intelligence (Sec. 510, 511) is complex and may hinder the effective application of safety measures or incite resistance from technology developers unwilling to navigate these cumbersome protocols.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For the intelligence community, the bill could introduce modernized protocols and increased funding, providing new tools to address diverse threats. However, the ambiguity in some provisions could create implementation challenges, requiring agencies to develop clearer internal policies.

Private sector partners, particularly those involved in technology and digital assets, might find themselves under increased scrutiny and regulatory burdens, potentially leading to challenges in compliance and operational strategies.

Conversely, specific groups such as whistleblowers might benefit from better protections (Sec. 801) while confronting possible reprisal threats. However, the lack of a clear legal framework might curb the willingness or ability of individuals to come forward.

Overall, while the bill proposes nuanced and comprehensive reforms to enhance U.S. intelligence capabilities, it also introduces areas of concern related to privacy and administrative clarity that warrant careful consideration and possible revision to ensure efficiency and protect citizen rights.

Financial Assessment

The proposed legislation, S. 4443, authorizes appropriations for intelligence and related activities of the United States Government, with specific financial allocations outlined in several sections of the bill. This commentary will examine those financial allocations and how they relate to the issues identified in the legislation.

Financial Summary

The bill authorizes specific amounts for different purposes related to intelligence activities:

  1. Intelligence Community Management Account: The bill allocates $656,573,000 for fiscal year 2025 for the Intelligence Community Management Account of the Director of National Intelligence. This funding is likely intended to support the administration and operation of activities within the intelligence community.

  2. Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund: An allocation of $514,000,000 is authorized for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund for fiscal year 2025. This fund supports retirement and disability benefits for former CIA employees.

  3. Intelligence Community Technology Bridge Fund: There is an authorization of $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 and each fiscal year thereafter, with a limitation that the fund's balance should not exceed $75,000,000 at any time. This funding supports the transition of technology from research and development to full-scale production and usage within the intelligence community.

  4. Awards for Air America Employees: A total amount not to exceed $60,000,000 is allocated to provide awards to individuals who performed qualifying service for Air America or a survivor of such individuals. Specific awards include $40,000 for individuals serving 5 or more years, with additional payments of $8,000 for each year of service beyond 5 years.

Relationship to Identified Issues

The bill presents several financial-related issues or concerns:

  • Unlimited Compensatory Damages: The elimination of a cap on compensatory damages for retaliatory actions (Sec. 807) may pose significant financial risks for the government. Without a cap, this provision could result in substantial liabilities if damages are awarded excessively.

  • Awards for Air America Employees: The lack of a clear definition for "qualifying service" might lead to inconsistent application of awards, affecting transparency and fairness in distributing the $60,000,000 fund designed for former Air America employees or their survivors.

  • Utilization of the Technology Bridge Fund: While $75,000,000 is allocated for enhancing technology, there is complexity and potential ambiguity in how these funds will be used effectively, as suggested by concerns over the complex management of AI security risks (Sec. 510, 511).

  • Governance and Oversight Issues: While substantial financial resources like the $656,573,000 for the Intelligence Community Management Account are provided, there are concerns about possible overlaps in roles and responsibilities within the intelligence community. These overlaps could lead to inefficiencies in fund utilization, subsequently affecting intended outcomes.

In summary, the bill outlines significant appropriations for intelligence-related activities, with some funding earmarked for specific purposes, such as retirement benefits and technology advancements. However, the financial allocations are entangled with clarity and oversight issues, which could potentially hinder effective and fair use of the allocated funds.

Issues

  • The broad discretion granted to the Director of the CIA to determine 'extraordinary circumstances' for paying costs of treating qualifying injuries (Sec. 901) is concerning without clear definition or oversight mechanisms, which could lead to inconsistent applications or unchecked spending.

  • The bill's language permits potential overlaps in the roles and responsibilities within the intelligence community, such as in the Office of Economic Intelligence and Security (Sec. 312), which may lead to inefficiencies and jurisdictional conflicts.

  • The provision allowing for the collection and use of sensitive commercially available information (Sec. 313) raises significant privacy concerns, especially given the broad definitions and the potential for misuse of personal information.

  • The classification and declassification reform sections (Sec. 601, 602) lack clear criteria for classification and may lead to indefinite classification without proper oversight, raising transparency issues.

  • Unlimited compensatory damages for retaliatory revocation of security clearances without clear guidelines (Sec. 807) could result in substantial financial liability for the government.

  • The bill's approach to managing potential risks associated with artificial intelligence (Sec. 510, 511) seems overly complex and lacks clarity, which could hinder effective implementation and enforcement.

  • The lack of definition for 'qualifying service' and the criteria used to determine awards to former employees of Air America (Sec. 1104, 1105) could result in inconsistent and potentially unfair applications.

  • The Funding limitation for activities involving unidentified anomalous phenomena (Sec. 1003) may hinder urgent actions requiring confidentiality, posing national security risks.

  • The broad authority to collect United States location information without specific penalties for non-compliance (Sec. 314) raises concerns about civil liberties and privacy.

  • The provision in Sec. 423 regarding sanctions on digital asset facilitators is broad and could lead to challenges in enforcement due to ambiguity in definitions and requirements.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 outlines various measures and authorizations related to intelligence activities, including funding and structural enhancements across multiple intelligence and security organizations. Additionally, it addresses threats from foreign entities, emerging technologies, classification reforms, workforce improvements, whistleblower protections, and other significant areas affecting national security.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the terms "congressional intelligence committees" and "intelligence community" are defined as having the same meanings as those given in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947.

101. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Funds can be set aside for the government's intelligence and related activities for the year 2025.

102. Classified Schedule of Authorizations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the process for handling the classified Schedule of Authorizations related to intelligence activities. It specifies that this schedule is available to certain government committees and the President, who is responsible for appropriately distributing it within the executive branch, while ensuring it is not publicly disclosed except under specific conditions, such as legal requirements or budget implementation needs.

103. Intelligence Community Management Account Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes a budget of $656,573,000 for the Intelligence Community Management Account for the fiscal year 2025. Additionally, more funds can be allocated as detailed in a classified document associated with the bill.

Money References

  • (a) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated for the Intelligence Community Management Account of the Director of National Intelligence for fiscal year 2025 the sum of $656,573,000.

104. Increase in employee compensation and benefits authorized by law Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In Section 104, the law permits increasing the funds allocated for federal employees' salaries and benefits. These increases can be made as needed to cover any legally authorized boosts in pay or benefits.

201. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text authorizes the allocation of $514 million for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund for the year 2025.

Money References

  • There is authorized to be appropriated for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund $514,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.

301. Improvements relating to conflicts of interest in the Intelligence Innovation Board Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendments to the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 make changes to how conflicts of interest are managed on the Intelligence Innovation Board. These changes include giving the designated agency ethics official the power to grant conflict of interest waivers with some conditions, such as no waivers for active conflicts involving the Board Chair and requiring approval from the Director of National Intelligence for potential conflicts, along with setting a definition for the role of the designated agency ethics official.

302. National Threat Identification and Prioritization Assessment and National Counterintelligence Strategy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002 by changing the title "National Counterintelligence Executive" to "Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center."

303. Open Source Intelligence Division of Office of Intelligence and Analysis personnel Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the funds allocated for 2025 cannot be used to hire more people in the Department of Homeland Security's Open Source Intelligence Division specifically for domestic terrorism issues beyond what was in place before this law was enacted.

304. Appointment of Director of the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the law governing the appointment of the Director of the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence at the Department of Energy, specifying that the Director, appointed by the President with Senate approval, will serve a 6-year term and can be reappointed. The Director must be a qualified senior employee with significant expertise in intelligence and related fields, and this change will take effect on January 21, 2025.

305. Improvements to advisory board of National Reconnaissance Office Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates rules for the advisory board of the National Reconnaissance Office, allowing up to 8 members without conflicts of interest and specifying that no more than 2 members can be based on the same qualification. It also mandates a charter to manage conflicts of interest and extends the board's expiry date to August 31, 2027.

306. National Intelligence University acceptance of grants Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section permits the Director of National Intelligence to allow the President of the National Intelligence University to accept research grants, provided they are awarded by eligible entities like federal agencies or educational institutions for scientific, literary, or educational purposes. It also outlines the establishment of an account to manage these funds, states that National Intelligence University can use its appropriations to handle related expenses, and requires regulations for administering grant funds.

1035. National Intelligence University acceptance of grants Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The National Intelligence University can accept research grants from federal agencies or organizations focused on science, literature, or education. These grants must be awarded competitively, and received funds are to be managed in a special account, used according to rules set by the Director of National Intelligence. Additionally, the University can use its budget to cover costs related to applying for such grants.

307. Protection of Central Intelligence Agency facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is authorized to take certain actions to protect its facilities and assets in the United States from threats posed by unmanned aircraft, such as detecting and disrupting their control. These actions must be coordinated with the Secretary of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration to ensure that the National Airspace System is not adversely affected. The law outlines privacy protections and requires regular reporting to Congress on how these authorities are used, with a general termination of these powers set for four years after enactment unless extended by the President for national security reasons.

15A. Protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes the Director to take various actions to protect certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft, such as detecting, disrupting, or seizing these aircraft without prior consent if they pose a threat to safety or security. It also outlines the need for coordination with the Secretary of Transportation and the FAA, emphasizes privacy protection measures, and obliges briefing and notifications to Congress, with the authority extending for 4 years unless extended by the President for national security reasons.

308. Limitation on availability of funds for new controlled access programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section limits the use of funds for certain new intelligence programs in 2025, stating that no money can be used for these programs until the head of the relevant intelligence agency properly informs Congress, as required by existing national security laws.

309. Limitation on transfers from controlled access programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 501A(b) of the National Security Act of 1947 places restrictions on transferring capabilities from controlled access programs to other special access programs or outside entities. It requires that before such a transfer can occur, the head of the intelligence community must notify the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the intent to make the transfer.

310. Expenditure of funds for certain intelligence and counterintelligence activities of the Coast Guard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Commandant of the Coast Guard is allowed to use up to 1% of the funds from the National Intelligence Program each year for special intelligence and counterintelligence activities. These activities are confidential or urgent, and the Commandant's certification is enough to account for the spending.

311. Unauthorized access to intelligence community property Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section makes it illegal to access property belonging to the U.S. intelligence community without permission if it is clearly marked as closed or restricted. Penalties for doing so include fines and imprisonment, with increasing severity for repeat offenses, starting with up to 180 days in jail for the first offense, up to 3 years for the second, and up to 10 years for the third or more.

1115. Unauthorized access to intelligence community property Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Unauthorized access to property under the control of the intelligence community is illegal in the United States if the property is marked as closed or restricted. Penalties for breaking this law include fines and imprisonment, with increasing severity for repeated offenses, starting at up to 180 days for a first offense and up to 10 years for a third offense.

312. Strengthening of Office of Intelligence and Analysis Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates a law to rename the Office of Intelligence and Analysis at the Department of the Treasury to the Office of Economic Intelligence and Security. It establishes new responsibilities for this office, such as handling foreign intelligence related to economic policy, and specifies that the office will be led by an Assistant Secretary appointed by the President.

311. Office of Economic Intelligence and Security Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the Office of Economic Intelligence and Security within the Department of the Treasury, which is responsible for handling intelligence related to economic policies. The Office will support various federal agencies by providing economic analysis and intelligence, and it will be led by an Assistant Secretary appointed by the President and approved by the Senate.

313. Report on sensitive commercially available information Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a requirement for intelligence agencies to report annually on their use of sensitive commercially available information, including personal data, for activities beyond research and development. This includes detailing the nature, source, legal authority, and privacy precautions associated with the data, as well as the potential privacy and security risks, while public reports on these activities must be released every two years.

314. Policy on collection of United States location information Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of National Intelligence to create a policy about how the intelligence community can collect and handle information that shows the location of people in the United States. This policy must be available to the public, although some parts can remain classified and shared only with specific congressional committees.

315. Display of flags, seals, and emblems other than the United States flag Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, rules are set for displaying flags, seals, and emblems at intelligence community locations. Flags other than the U.S. flag must be smaller and not positioned higher, and only specific flags like the U.S. flag, POW/MIA, and others are allowed with funding prohibitions on flying unauthorized ones.

401. Strategy and outreach on risks posed by People's Republic of China smartport technology Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center to develop a strategy and reach out to U.S. industries about the security risks posed by China's smartport technology and companies like COSCO and CCCC. This effort must align with U.S. laws and Executive Orders and be coordinated with other federal agencies, including the Coast Guard and the FBI.

402. Assessment of current status of biotechnology of People's Republic of China Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of National Intelligence to conduct an assessment of China's biotechnology status within 30 days of enacting the bill, examining both legal and illegal support methods like investments and talent recruitment. A report of the findings must be submitted to congressional intelligence committees in an unclassified form, with the possibility of a classified annex.

403. Intelligence sharing with law enforcement agencies on synthetic opioid precursor chemicals originating in People’s Republic of China Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a plan for the Director of National Intelligence to work with various government officials to create a strategy for sharing intelligence about the illegal trafficking of synthetic opioid chemicals from China and other countries. It also requires the creation of a system for experts from outside the intelligence community, including those without security clearances, to share information with intelligence agencies on this issue.

404. Report on efforts of the People's Republic of China to evade United States transparency and national security regulations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of National Intelligence to submit a report to Congress on how China might be trying to bypass U.S. security and transparency regulations. This report should include efforts to evade specific laws, lists of restricted entities, and import rules, and it must be provided in an unclassified form.

405. Plan for recruitment of Mandarin speakers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of National Intelligence to create and submit a detailed plan within 180 days to prioritize hiring and training people who speak Mandarin Chinese for intelligence roles. It specifies that this plan should be sent to certain congressional committees responsible for intelligence and judiciary matters.

411. Assessment of Russian Federation sponsorship of acts of international terrorism Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of National Intelligence to assess and report to specific congressional committees on whether Russia supports terrorism or cooperates with U.S. efforts against terrorism within 180 days of the Act's enactment. The assessment must list instances of Russian non-cooperation or support for terrorism and determine if the Wagner Group's activities amount to international terrorism, with a briefing to follow on the findings.

412. Assessment of likely course of war in Ukraine Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Within 90 days of this bill becoming law, the Director of National Intelligence, with other intelligence agencies, must give Congress an assessment on the possible outcomes of the war in Ukraine until the end of 2025. This report will explore how Ukraine's defense might change based on U.S. military and economic support, the reaction of other countries to the U.S. assistance level, and the global effects of a potential Ukrainian defeat.

421. Inclusion of Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS officials and members among aliens engaged in terrorist activity Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act makes it clear that any members, spokespeople, or supporters of terrorist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, or similar groups cannot be allowed into the United States.

422. Assessment and report on the threat of ISIS-Khorasan to the United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center to evaluate the threat ISIS-Khorasan poses to the United States and submit a detailed report to Congress within 60 days. The report must discuss the group's history, intentions, global activities, and connections with other terrorist organizations, as well as their relationships and activities related to travel and border security.

423. Terrorist financing prevention Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section aims to prevent terrorist financing by defining key terms related to digital assets and financial institutions and establishing sanctions on foreign entities that engage in transactions with terrorist organizations. It requires the Secretary of the Treasury to identify and report such entities, allows the President to impose sanctions, and provides for penalties and exceptions, including a national security waiver and an exception for intelligence activities.

431. Assessment of visa-free travel to and within Western Hemisphere by nationals of countries of concern Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Director of National Intelligence to provide a report to Congress, within 90 days of the bill's passing, assessing the national security impacts of allowing citizens from specific countries to travel without a visa in the Western Hemisphere. These countries are Russia, China, Iran, Syria, North Korea, Venezuela, and Cuba. The report should be unclassified but may include a classified part.

432. Study on threat posed by foreign investment in United States agricultural land Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a study to be conducted by the Director of National Intelligence, in collaboration with several U.S. government departments, on the risks posed by foreign investments in U.S. agricultural land. It mandates a detailed analysis of land ownership by foreigners from countries threatening U.S. national security, including the proximity of these lands to important infrastructure, and requires the Director to provide the findings to specific Congressional committees.

433. Assessment of threat posed by citizenship-by-investment programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines terms and outlines a requirement for the Director of National Intelligence and the Assistant Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis to assess how citizenship-by-investment programs might threaten U.S. national security. This assessment must identify such programs, evaluate risks posed by these programs when used by bad actors, and determine which countries' programs pose the biggest threat, followed by a report and briefing to Congress.

434. Mitigating the use of United States components and technology in hostile activities by foreign adversaries Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has recognized that foreign adversaries often use U.S. components and services for hostile activities and is requiring a strategy to prevent this. The Director of National Intelligence will work with various U.S. departments and companies to stop foreign use of U.S. technology for harmful purposes and report on the progress annually for three years.

435. Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence review of visitors and assignees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section outlines measures to check foreign visitors or assignees seeking access to U.S. National Laboratories, aiming to safeguard sensitive technology and information from countries posing a threat to national security. It mandates thorough screening by the Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, with quarterly reports to Congress on access permissions and related advisories.

436. Prohibition on National Laboratories admitting certain foreign nationals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the law prevents National Laboratories from letting certain foreign nationals from specific countries, such as China and Russia, visit or work there for more than 30 days, unless a special waiver is given by the Secretary of Energy after consulting with intelligence officials. The waiver can only be issued if the benefits of allowing the person outweigh any security or economic risks, and any such waivers must be reported to specific Congressional committees.

437. Quarterly report on certain foreign nationals encountered at the United States border Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the Secretary of Homeland Security must publicly report every three months on the number of special interest aliens encountered at U.S. borders. These reports should include those released, supervised, detained, or removed, and emphasize individuals posing potential national security threats based on travel patterns and other information.

438. Assessment of the lessons learned by the intelligence community with respect to the Israel-Hamas war Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Director of National Intelligence to provide an assessment to specific Congressional committees within 90 days, focusing on lessons learned from the Israel-Hamas war. This includes examining various aspects such as intelligence cooperation, new warfare tactics, attacks on maritime routes, and the use of advanced weaponry, as well as analyzing the broader impact on global security and the war in Ukraine.

439. Central Intelligence Agency intelligence assessment on Tren de Aragua Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency to provide Congress with a detailed intelligence report on the gang "Tren de Aragua", covering its leaders, structure, activities, and connections with other criminal organizations and the Venezuelan government. The report is due within 90 days and can be classified, with specific congressional committees receiving the information.

440. Assessment of Maduro regime’s economic and security relationships with state sponsors of terrorism and foreign terrorist organizations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Director of National Intelligence is required to submit a report to Congress within 90 days, assessing the economic and security ties between Nicolás Maduro's regime in Venezuela and certain countries and organizations, including Cuba, Iran, and groups like the National Liberation Army (ELN) and FARC-EP. This report will be available in an unclassified form, but it may also have a classified part.

441. Continued congressional oversight of Iranian expenditures supporting foreign military and terrorist activities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Director of National Intelligence to provide an updated report to Congress on Iran's military and terrorist spending within 90 days of the law being enacted. The report should be mostly unclassified but can have a classified part if needed.

501. Strategy to counter foreign adversary efforts to utilize biotechnologies in ways that threaten United States national security Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress believes biotechnologies are crucial to U.S. national security, and it requires the Director of National Intelligence to create a strategy to counter potential threats from foreign nations. This strategy should identify important biotechnologies, find ways to protect them from foreign misuse, ensure secure supply chains, and suggest any needed legal or administrative changes.

502. Improvements to the roles, missions, and objectives of the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the National Security Act of 1947 to expand and clarify the responsibilities of the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center by emphasizing coordination and oversight in areas like intelligence analysis related to biosecurity threats, and enhancing collaboration with the private sector and other federal agencies on biotechnology and foreign biological threats.

503. Enhancing capabilities to detect foreign adversary threats relating to biological data Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that the Director of National Intelligence, together with other federal agencies, must improve the intelligence community's ability to identify threats from foreign adversaries related to biological data. This includes focusing on how such data might endanger national security, setting policies for data-handling while respecting privacy, engaging with international partners, and working with private sectors to monitor how this data is accessed and used.

504. National security procedures to address certain risks and threats relating to artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress requires the President to create procedures within 180 days to manage risks related to artificial intelligence, including notifying the government of AI-related security threats, biosecurity hazards, and foreign influences. Additionally, these procedures must include government briefings for AI vendors about potential or confirmed foreign exploitation of their systems, and regular updates to key congressional committees on these plans.

505. Establishment of Artificial Intelligence Security Center Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill mandates the creation of an Artificial Intelligence Security Center within the National Security Agency's Cybersecurity Collaboration Center. This center will provide a research environment for AI security, offer guidance on countering AI threats, promote secure AI practices in national security, and work with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, while ensuring access to proprietary AI models for research and limiting the sharing of sensitive information.

506. Sense of Congress encouraging intelligence community to increase private sector capital partnerships and partnership with Office of Strategic Capital of Department of Defense to secure enduring technological advantages Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress believes that the intelligence community should partner with private sector investors and consult with the Department of Defense’s Office of Strategic Capital to develop and use new technologies that support national security goals.

507. Intelligence Community Technology Bridge Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Intelligence Community Technology Bridge Fund is established to help move products or services from research to production, with financial aid available as grants or other payments for businesses and nonprofits involved with the intelligence community or Department of Defense. Priority is given to small businesses and nontraditional defense contractors, and the fund is managed by the Director of National Intelligence, who must report annually to Congress on the fund's use and achievements.

Money References

  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), there is authorized to be appropriated to the Fund $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 and for each fiscal year thereafter.
  • (2) LIMITATION.—The amount in the Fund shall not exceed $75,000,000 at any time. ---

508. Enhancement of authority for intelligence community public-private talent exchanges Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section enhances the authority for public-private talent exchanges in the intelligence community, focusing on fields like finance, biotechnology, and cybersecurity, and extends the duration of temporary details from 3 to 5 years. It also addresses employment, conflict of interest rules, and allows the Director of National Intelligence to hire private-sector employees without requiring a personnel billet, while requiring annual reports on these exchanges for three years.

509. Enhancing intelligence community ability to acquire emerging technology that fulfills intelligence community needs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Director of National Intelligence or intelligence community heads to buy products or services from companies that have completed a "work program" with In-Q-Tel without using competitive procedures, if certain needs are met. It requires a written justification for skipping competitive procedures, explaining the need, certifying cost fairness, and detailing any market research done.

510. Management of artificial intelligence security risks Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines measures for managing security risks associated with artificial intelligence. It defines different types of AI-related incidents and vulnerabilities, mandates the creation of a voluntary database to track such events, and calls for updated processes to manage these vulnerabilities effectively. It also emphasizes developing best practices for handling risks related to AI model training and supply chains.

511. Protection of technological measures designed to verify authenticity or provenance of machine-manipulated media Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the protection of technological measures that verify the authenticity of machine-manipulated media, prohibiting actions like subverting these measures or distributing false information about media authenticity. It provides exemptions for certain nonprofit and governmental activities and allows the Attorney General to enforce violations through civil actions, with possible damages ranging from $200 to $25,000 per violation, including provisions for reduced damages in cases of innocent violations or repeated offenses.

Money References

  • (i) ELECTION OF AMOUNT BASED ON NUMBER OF ACTS OF CIRCUMVENTION.—At any time before final judgment is entered, the Attorney General may elect to recover an award of statutory damages for each violation of subsection (b) in the sum of not less than $200 or more than $2,500 per act of circumvention, device, product, component, offer, or performance of service, as the court considers just.
  • (ii) ELECTION OF AMOUNT; TOTAL AMOUNT.—At any time before final judgment is entered, the Attorney General may elect to recover an award of statutory damages for each violation of subsection (b) in the sum of not less than $2,500 or more than $25,000.

512. Sense of Congress on hostile foreign cyber actors Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress expresses its opinion that certain foreign ransomware organizations and their associates should be considered hostile cyber threats by the United States. The bill lists specific groups, like DarkSide, Conti, and others, as examples of these cyber actors.

513. Designation of state sponsors of ransomware and reporting requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill requires the Secretary of State to designate countries that support ransomware as "state sponsors of ransomware" and report these designations to Congress, while the President must impose sanctions similar to those for state sponsors of terrorism. It also requires various reports on ransomware-related sanctions, country origins of ransomware attacks, and investigative authorities available to respond to such attacks.

514. Deeming ransomware threats to critical infrastructure a national intelligence priority Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that ransomware threats to critical infrastructure be considered a top national intelligence priority. It requires the Director of National Intelligence to provide a detailed report to Congress on ransomware threats, including the identification of key actors, their tactics, and any obstacles to countering these threats, within 180 days of the enactment of the Act.

601. Governance of classification and declassification system Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a system for governing the classification and declassification of information within the federal government. It requires the President to appoint an Executive Agent and an Executive Committee to manage this process, and it mandates a report to Congress detailing the resources and authority needed for these roles, with an emphasis on public transparency.

602. Classification and declassification of information Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the President's authority to classify and declassify information to protect national security, setting standards and procedures for both processes. It mandates that no information should be classified indefinitely or used to hide wrongdoing and requires that some records be automatically declassified after 50 years.

801A. Classification and declassification of information Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the President's authority and responsibilities for classifying and declassifying government information to protect national security. It sets up rules and procedures, including that classifications can't conceal wrongdoing or embarrass people, information should eventually be declassified, and that basic scientific research not tied to national security shouldn't be classified.

603. Minimum standards for Executive agency insider threat programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Each executive agency of the U.S. government that deals with classified information is required to have a program to prevent insider threats. These programs must monitor classified networks, designate a senior official to oversee them, and provide training to employees. Additionally, the Director of National Intelligence must report to Congress every year on how well agencies are following these rules.

701. Security clearances held by certain former employees of intelligence community Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirement for issuing guidelines about security clearances for former presidential appointees in the intelligence community, allowing them to retain access to classified information only under specific conditions. It also mandates that the Director of National Intelligence submit these guidelines to Congress within 180 days and provide an annual report on the clearance status of such individuals.

702. Policy for authorizing intelligence community program of contractor-owned and contractor-operated sensitive compartmented information facilities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the need for a standardized policy, set by the Director of National Intelligence, that allows private contractors to own and manage secure information facilities for the intelligence community. It also requires the Director to consider cost-saving models where the government does not provide funding and to update Congress about progress and challenges within a year.

703. Enabling intelligence community integration Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendment to the National Security Act of 1947 allows different parts of the intelligence community to share goods and services for hoteling initiatives without needing to exchange money or funds, as long as they follow guidelines set by the Director of National Intelligence. Both parties must agree on the provision before it takes place.

113C. Enabling intelligence community integration Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows different parts of the intelligence community to share goods or services with each other for hoteling initiatives without needing to exchange money, as long as they follow guidelines from the Director of National Intelligence and both parties agree to the arrangement.

704. Appointment of spouses of certain Federal employees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates a law to include spouses of employees from the Department of State and the intelligence community, in addition to those from the military and Department of Defense, making them eligible for certain federal job appointments when they relocate due to their spouse's job. It also defines terms like "remote work" and "telework" to clarify that these spouses can work remotely if needed.

705. Plan for staffing the intelligence collection positions of the Central Intelligence Agency Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency is required to submit a plan to Congress within 90 days to ensure all authorized intelligence collection positions are filled. The plan must include specific goals and timelines to achieve this by September 2025, and assess the staffing balance between different CIA departments.

706. Intelligence community workplace protections Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section discusses changes to employment rules for the intelligence community, including converting certain positions to a special job category and requiring heads of intelligence agencies to inform congressional committees about employment changes and guidelines. It also outlines the conditions under which the CIA Director and other intelligence officials can terminate employees, emphasizing the need for notifications and explanations to Congress, especially when national security is a concern.

707. Sense of Congress on Government personnel support for foreign terrorist organizations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress suggests that when deciding if someone can access classified information, activities supporting foreign terrorist organizations should be considered as promoting terrorism, including supporting or seeking funds for these groups.

801. Improvements regarding urgent concerns submitted to Inspectors General of the intelligence community Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines amendments to improve the process for intelligence community employees and contractors to report urgent concerns to Inspectors General. It specifies requirements for complaints, including written submissions, support for submitting complaints, timelines for determining credibility, and conditions for transmitting complaints directly to congressional intelligence committees while ensuring the employee's anonymity and following security practices.

802. Prohibition against disclosure of whistleblower identity as act of reprisal Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the National Security Act of 1947 to prohibit the unauthorized disclosure of a whistleblower's identity as an act of retaliation and establishes a private legal action for employees affected by such disclosures, allowing them to seek remedies, including financial compensation, after exhausting all administrative remedies.

Money References

  • “(3) PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR DISCLOSURES OF WHISTLEBLOWER IDENTITY IN VIOLATION OF PROHIBITION AGAINST REPRISALS.—Subject to paragraph (4), in a case in which an employee of an agency takes a personnel action described in subsection (a)(3)(J) against an employee of a covered intelligence community element as a reprisal in violation of subsection (b) or in a case in which an employee or contractor employee takes a personnel action described in subsection (a)(3)(J) against another contractor employee as a reprisal in violation of subsection (c), the employee or contractor employee against whom the personnel action was taken may, consistent with section 1221 of title 5, United States Code, bring a private action for all appropriate remedies, including injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, in an amount not to exceed $250,000, against the agency of the employee or contracting agency of the contractor employee who took the personnel action, in a Federal district court of competent jurisdiction.

803. Protection for individuals making authorized disclosures to Inspectors General of elements of the intelligence community Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Under this section, individuals in the intelligence community can disclose classified information to an Inspector General—even if they lack clearance—as long as it follows security rules. These disclosures are treated as authorized, meaning they don't break any secrecy agreements or laws.

804. Clarification of authority of certain Inspectors General to receive protected disclosures Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section clarifies that certain Inspectors General have the authority to receive protected disclosures from not only the employing or contracting agency but also from a "covered intelligence community element," expanding their oversight capabilities.

805. Whistleblower protections relating to psychiatric testing or examination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill amends the National Security Act to include protections for whistleblowers by adding a new rule that prevents ordering psychiatric testing or examinations as a form of retaliation. This change will apply to all relevant cases from the date the law is enacted.

806. Establishing process parity for adverse security clearance and access determinations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 specifies that if an individual can show their security clearance issue was influenced by a disclosure they made, it may be considered a violation, unless the agency can convincingly prove the same decision would have occurred without the disclosure.

807. Elimination of cap on compensatory damages for retaliatory revocation of security clearances and access determinations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment removes the previous limit of $300,000 on compensatory damages for cases involving the retaliatory revocation of security clearances and access decisions under the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.

Money References

  • Section 3001(j)(4)(B) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (50 U.S.C. 3341(j)(4)(B)) is amended, in the second sentence, by striking “not to exceed $300,000”. ---

901. Additional discretion for Director of Central Intelligence Agency in paying costs of treating qualifying injuries and making payments for qualifying injuries to the brain Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section grants the Director of the CIA extra authority to cover the costs for treating serious injuries, especially brain injuries, for employees and their families under special circumstances. It also requires the Director to inform Congress within 30 days whenever such payments are made.

902. Additional discretion for Secretary of State and heads of other Federal agencies in paying costs of treating qualifying injuries and making payments for qualifying injuries to the brain Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Secretary of State and other federal agency heads to use their discretion to pay for or reimburse costs related to treating certain injuries under extraordinary circumstances, which are not covered by other federal laws. It also changes the date from January 1, 2016, to September 11, 2001, for some definitions and clarifies that these rules do not apply to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

903. Improved funding flexibility for payments made by Department of State for qualifying injuries to the brain Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the law to allow the State Department more flexibility in using funds for payments related to specific brain injuries. It requires the Secretary of State to provide an annual estimate of the needed funds to Congress when presenting the budget.

1001. Comptroller General of the United States review of All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Comptroller General of the United States to review the activities of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, focusing on how it handles unidentified anomalous phenomena and its cooperation with other Federal and non-Government entities, with the findings to be reported to key congressional committees and leaders.

1002. Sunset of requirements relating to audits of unidentified anomalous phenomena historical record report Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 1002 amends the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, specifying that audits of unidentified anomalous phenomena historical records should continue on a quarterly basis until April 1, 2025, and then semiannually until June 30, 2025.

1003. Funding limitations relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, it defines the bodies involved and limitations around funding related to unidentified anomalous phenomena. It specifies that funds cannot be used for activities related to these phenomena without informing certain Congressional committees and leaders, and independent research funding must be shared with them to be considered allowable expenses.

1101. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that this title can be referred to as the "Air America Act of 2024".

1102. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress acknowledges that Air America, along with its associated companies, worked with the CIA to help the U.S. government from 1950 to 1976. They commended the Air America employees for their sacrifices, including experiencing many casualties, rescuing thousands of people, and working under tough conditions abroad.

1103. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text defines key terms used in the bill, including what constitutes an "affiliated company" related to Air America, identifies relevant congressional committees, and clarifies who is considered a "survivor," "covered decedent," and which jobs qualify as "qualifying service" during a specified period involving Air America and its related companies.

1104. Award authorized to eligible persons Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes the Director to award $40,000 to individuals who have completed at least 5 years of qualifying service or to their survivors, with an additional $8,000 for each extra year of service beyond the initial 5 years. If the award is for a survivor, the payment is given first to the surviving spouse, and if there is none, it is divided equally among the surviving dependents or children.

Money References

  • (a) In general.—Subject to the limitation in subsection (d), the Director shall provide an award payment of $40,000 under this section— (1) to an individual who performed qualifying service for a period greater than or equal to 5 years or to a survivor of such individual; or (2) to the survivor of a covered decedent.
  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—To be eligible for a payment under this subsection, an individual who performed qualifying service or survivor (as the case may be) must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that the individual whose qualifying service upon which the payment is based meets the criteria of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a). (2) RELIANCE ON RECORDS.—In carrying out this subsection, in addition to any evidence provided by such an individual or survivor, the Director may rely on records possessed by the United States Government. (c) Additional payment.—If an individual, or in the case of a survivor, the individual whose qualifying service upon which the payment is based, can demonstrate to the Director that the qualifying service of the individual exceeded 5 years, the Director shall pay to such individual or survivor an additional $8,000 for each full year in excess of 5 years (and a proportionate amount for a partial year). (d) Survivors.—In the case of an award granted to a survivor under this section, the payment shall be made— (1) to the surviving widow or widower; or (2) if there is no surviving widow or widower, to the surviving dependents or children, in equal shares. ---

1105. Funding limitation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the total amount of awards given under this title cannot exceed $60,000,000. If more funds are necessary to pay all valid applications, the Director will ask Congress for additional funds. Additionally, the Director can decide to award money to individuals who provided qualifying service as employees of Intermountain Aviation.

Money References

  • (a) In general.—The total amount of awards granted under this title may not exceed $60,000,000.

1106. Time limitation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Claimants are eligible for an award payment if they file a claim within 2 years of the regulations' effective date. The Director must decide on eligibility within 90 days and make the payment in one lump sum within 60 days of that decision. Any delays must be reported to Congress within 30 days of the payment's due date.

1107. Application procedures Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes the way the Director must set up processes for handling claims related to the title, including how claims are submitted, how awards are determined, and how appeals are handled. These procedures need to be established within 60 days of the Act's passage, published in the Code of Federal Regulations, and are exempt from certain federal rules.

1108. Rule of construction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section clarifies that the title does not grant anyone new federal benefits like retirement or disability benefits, does not alter the legal status of Air America or related businesses, and does not create any additional legal rights apart from the one-time award mentioned in the title.

1109. Attorneys’ and agents’ fees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Under this section, no more than 25% of a financial award can be paid to an attorney or agent for their services if they help someone get an award under section 1104. If an attorney or agent breaks this rule, they can be fined, according to U.S. law.

1110. No judicial review Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A decision made by the Director under this section is final and cannot be challenged or reviewed in a court.

1111. Reports to Congress Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director to send a report to Congress every six months until all funds are used up. The report must include the number of award payments made or denied, reasons for any denials, and if there are not enough funds to cover expected claims.

1201. Enhanced authorities for amicus curiae under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section expands the authority and responsibilities of amicus curiae under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, allowing them to raise and seek review of privacy and civil liberties issues, access necessary information including some classified documents, consult with other amici, and establishes term limits for their service.

1202. Limitation on directives under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 relating to certain electronic communication service providers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to specify that directives to certain electronic communication service providers can only be issued if these providers are involved with services mentioned in specific court opinions. It also outlines requirements for notifying the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Congress about newly issued or changed directives, along with guidelines for reporting and reviewing such actions.

1203. Strengthening Election Cybersecurity to Uphold Respect for Elections through Independent Testing Act of 2024 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The SECURE IT Act of 2024 aims to enhance election cybersecurity by mandating penetration testing for voting systems and establishing a five-year program for independent security testing and vulnerability disclosure. This program involves vetted researchers testing election systems with vendor cooperation while ensuring vulnerabilities are patched and reported in a timely manner, all under rules that protect participants engaging in good faith.

297. Independent security testing and coordinated cybersecurity vulnerability disclosure pilot program for election systems Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section outlines a 5-year pilot program to test and disclose cybersecurity vulnerabilities in election systems. The program allows cybersecurity researchers, after a vetting process, to safely test election equipment with vendor consent, provides guidelines for reporting vulnerabilities, and includes protective measures for researchers against legal action when acting in good faith.

1204. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board qualifications Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the qualifications for the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board by allowing experience in national security or positions needing a security clearance to count as relevant experience.

1205. Parity in pay for staff of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board and the intelligence community Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends a law to ensure that staff salaries on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board cannot exceed the highest salary paid for similar positions within the intelligence community, based on information given by the Director of National Intelligence.

1206. Modification and repeal of reporting requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines changes to various reporting and briefing requirements established under several Acts, mostly by repealing specific reports and altering deadlines. These changes include removing reports on topics like foreign influence in academia and foreign investment risks, modifying briefings about Iranian expenditures, and adjusting the submission date for intelligence community reviews.

1207. Technical amendments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The technical amendments increase the funding limits for facilities used by the intelligence community and change copyright rules for civilian faculty at certain institutions, allowing them to own copyrights for their work but also requiring them to grant the federal government a license to use their work.

Money References

  • (a) Requirements relating to construction of facilities to be used primarily by intelligence community.—Section 602(a) of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (50 U.S.C. 3304(a)) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking “$6,000,000” and inserting “$9,000,000”; and (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking “$2,000,000” each place it appears and inserting “$4,000,000”; and (B) by striking “$6,000,000” and inserting “$9,000,000”. (b) Copyright protection for civilian faculty of certain accredited institutions.—Section 105 of title 17, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: Ҥ 105.

105. Subject matter of copyright: United States Government works Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section explains that the United States Government cannot hold copyright protection for works it creates, but it can receive copyrights transferred to it. For certain "covered works" created by "covered authors" (faculty at specific military and national security-related institutions), various government officials, like the Secretary of Defense, can require these authors to give the government a license to use their works freely for government purposes.