Overview
Title
To prohibit transportation of any alien using certain methods of identification.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to stop airlines from letting people who aren't from the U.S. fly if they show certain papers or use a specific app to prove who they are. This rule is about making sure only safe and accepted IDs are used for flying.
Summary AI
S. 4387, also known as the “VALID Act,” seeks to prohibit air carriers from transporting any alien using specific types of identification. The bill would amend the United States Code to forbid airlines from operating flights or landing in the United States if they use the CBP One Mobile Application, DHS Form I-385, or DHS Form I-862 as identification or travel authorization. Additionally, the bill amends the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, preventing these types of identification from being recognized as valid for domestic flight boarding in the U.S.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, introduced in the U.S. Senate as S. 4387, aims to regulate the transportation of individuals designated as aliens based on their method of identification. Titled the “VALID Act,” the bill seeks to permanently prohibit air carriers from operating flights to the United States if they transport aliens using specific forms of identification. These prohibited methods include the CBP One Mobile Application and certain Department of Homeland Security forms (DHS Form I-385 and DHS Form I-862).
Summary of Significant Issues
This bill introduces several significant issues that merit further consideration:
Vague Terminology: The bill uses phrases like “actively provides” and “actively facilitates,” which lack precise definitions. This vagueness could lead to varying interpretations and enforcement challenges for air carriers.
Ambiguity in Identification Methods: While the bill prohibits certain forms of identification, it fails to specify what constitutes legitimate and acceptable methods of identification. This omission creates potential confusion regarding compliance.
Lack of Enforcement Detail: The legislation does not outline penalties or enforcement mechanisms for non-compliance, leading to potential inconsistencies in how the law might be applied and upheld.
International Relations and Economic Impact: By targeting specific transportation procedures, the bill could affect international carriers and lead to diplomatic and economic consequences. The absence of economic impact analysis on air carriers, regarding compliance costs and service disruptions, is a notable gap in the legislation.
Impact on Individuals: The prohibition of specific forms of identification could challenge individuals who rely on these methods, especially without provided alternatives or solutions for authentication.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could affect air travel both domestically and internationally. For the general traveling public, the ramifications might include disruptions in flight services and increased scrutiny over identification methods. This heightened scrutiny, while potentially increasing security, could also lead to delays and inconvenience, particularly if travelers are caught unaware by the restrictions on certain forms of identification.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Air Carriers: Airlines may face significant operational challenges and financial burdens as they adjust their processes to comply with the new restrictions. The lack of clarity in the bill could complicate efforts to adhere to the rules, potentially resulting in unintended violations and penalties.
International Carriers: For foreign airlines, the bill may necessitate changes in how passenger information is verified. This requirement could strain international relations, especially if foreign airlines view the legislation as overly restrictive or discriminatory.
Travelers Relying on Specific Identifications: Individuals, particularly certain immigrants or travelers using the forms of identification mentioned in the bill, may face barriers to travel. Without suggestions for alternative identification methods, these individuals could be unduly disadvantaged.
U.S. Government Agencies: Agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security will need to manage the implementation of this bill, ensuring that the proscribed forms are effectively eliminated without disrupting legitimate travel. This task may require additional resources and coordination across governmental and airline sectors.
In passing this legislation, lawmakers must carefully balance the intended increase in security and regulatory oversight with the practical implications for airlines and travelers. Further clarifications and amendments could be necessary to address the bill's gaps and ensure fair and effective implementation.
Issues
The bill does not specify the legitimate and acceptable methods of identification or travel authorization, creating ambiguity about what is prohibited (Sections 2 and 40131).
The terms 'actively provides' and 'actively facilitates' are vague, lacking precise definitions and could lead to varied interpretations and enforcement challenges (Sections 2 and 40131).
The prohibition could impact international relations and air travel, especially if it affects international carriers without diplomatic considerations (Sections 2 and 40131).
There are no clear penalties or enforcement mechanisms for non-compliance, which could result in inconsistencies in enforcement (Sections 2 and 40131).
The economic impact on air carriers, including compliance costs and potential service disruptions, is not discussed, which could significantly affect the industry (Section 2).
The bill does not provide an appeals process or oversight mechanism, which might be necessary for due process reasons (Section 2).
Prohibiting specific forms of identification may pose challenges for individuals relying on these forms, affecting their ability to travel. The bill does not suggest alternatives (Section 3).
The prohibition of specific identification forms does not explain the lack of security or reliability, and enforcement mechanisms are not detailed, leading to ambiguity in implementation (Section 3).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the official name of the legislation is the “VALID Act.”
2. Permanent prohibition on operations for air carriers that provide, or facilitate the provision of, transportation of any alien using certain methods of identification Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text proposes a law that would permanently ban air carriers from operating in the United States if they transport individuals using specific identification methods such as the CBP One Mobile App, or certain Department of Homeland Security forms.
40131. Permanent prohibition on operations for air carriers that transport any alien using certain methods of identification Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
An air carrier or foreign air carrier is prohibited from operating flights to the United States if it helps transport individuals who use certain forms of identification or travel documents, specifically the CBP One Mobile Application, DHS Form I-385, or DHS Form I-862.
3. Prohibition of certain forms of identification for airline passengers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 to prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from allowing certain forms of identification, such as the CBP One Mobile Application and specific Department of Homeland Security forms (I-385 and I-862), to be used as valid ID or travel documents for domestic airline passengers.