Overview
Title
To increase parking opportunities for persons recreating at Federal recreational lands and waters, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 4362, the "More Parking, More Hiking Act," wants to make sure people visiting parks and lakes have more parking spots. It tells park managers to find ways to add more parking without hurting nature and suggests using cameras to help visitors find parking spaces.
Summary AI
S. 4362, known as the "More Parking, More Hiking Act," aims to improve parking options for people visiting Federal recreational lands and waters. The bill instructs the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to increase parking spaces while ensuring minimal environmental impact and maintenance burdens. It permits partnerships with private entities and local governments for parking solutions and encourages using technology, like trailhead cameras, to improve parking management and availability.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the “More Parking, More Hiking Act,” aims to enhance parking facilities at Federal recreational lands and waters. Introduced by Senator Hickenlooper, the bill seeks to address the growing demand for parking spaces by promoting the development of additional parking opportunities in alignment with existing land use laws and minimizing any adverse effects on maintenance and wildlife habitats. To achieve these goals, the bill authorizes the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to employ various strategies, including forming partnerships with private entities and local governments, leasing land, and integrating technological solutions to better manage parking.
Significant Issues
Several issues within the bill warrant attention. First, the lack of specific guidelines for establishing public-private partnerships could lead to potential favoritism or inefficiencies. Additionally, the term "maximum extent practicable" is ambiguous and could result in inconsistent application of technological solutions, potentially leading to wasteful spending if clear budgets and guidelines are not established. The bill also lacks precise definitions for what constitutes "critical" wildlife habitats, which could lead to disputes during implementation. Moreover, even though the bill intends to minimize maintenance costs, there remains the possibility of increased expenses as parking facilities expand.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill could enhance access to Federal recreational lands and waters by making it easier to find parking, thereby improving the overall recreational experience. Easier access could encourage more people to enjoy outdoor activities, contributing to public health and well-being. However, if technological implementations are not managed correctly, it might lead to confusion or frustration due to varying levels of execution across different recreational sites.
Impact on Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
Outdoor Enthusiasts: They would likely benefit from improved access and convenience, potentially leading to more frequent visits and extended stays at Federal recreational sites.
Local Economies: Communities near these recreational lands may experience increased tourism, resulting in greater economic activity and job creation in sectors such as hospitality and retail.
Tech Companies: Firms specializing in data management and technology services could find new opportunities as the government seeks to implement technological solutions for parking management.
Negative Impacts
Environmental Advocates: There may be concerns about potential environmental impacts resulting from expanded parking areas or increased human presence, particularly if "critical" wildlife habitats are not adequately protected.
Federal Agencies: Agencies responsible for managing these lands might face challenges in balancing increased infrastructure demands with the imperative to conserve natural habitats and manage potential environmental impacts.
Local Governments: While partnerships could be beneficial, local governments might also encounter administrative burdens and costs associated with developing new parking infrastructures or transportation systems on public lands.
Overall, the "More Parking, More Hiking Act" presents a proactive approach to managing the growing needs of outdoor recreation while acknowledging the necessity of responsible environmental stewardship. The bill recognizes the potential benefits of increased access to natural areas but must carefully consider and address the outlined issues to ensure a balanced and sustainable implementation.
Issues
Lack of specificity about how public-private partnerships will be selected or managed, which could lead to favoritism or inefficiency (Section 3b1).
Ambiguity in the term 'maximum extent practicable' allowing for varying interpretations and implementation in regards to technological solutions (Section 3c).
No clear definition of what constitutes 'critical' wildlife habitat, leading to potential disputes in implementation (Section 3a3).
Possibility of increased maintenance costs despite language aiming to minimize them (Section 3a2).
Potential for wasteful spending in the pursuit of technological solutions without clear guidelines or budgets (Section 3c).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the law will be officially called the “More Parking, More Hiking Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the Act defines two terms: "Federal recreational lands and waters", which has the same meaning as in the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, and "Secretaries", which refers to the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture.
3. Parking opportunities for Federal recreational lands and waters Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretaries aim to increase parking for people visiting Federal recreational lands and waters while ensuring minimal impact on maintenance and wildlife habitats. They may collaborate with private and government entities, lease land, or implement technology to manage parking efficiently.