Overview
Title
To amend the Federal Power Act to prohibit the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from issuing permits for the construction or modification of electric transmission facilities in a State over the objection of the State, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to stop a big group, called the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, from building or changing power lines in a state if the state says no. This is to make sure the people who live there, especially farmers, are okay with these projects.
Summary AI
S. 4348 aims to amend the Federal Power Act to prevent the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from granting permits for electric transmission facilities' construction or modification in any state that objects to it. This bill, titled the “Protecting Our Farmers from the Green New Deal Act,” seeks to protect farmers and landowners from federally mandated projects that state regulators oppose. It specifies that the Commission cannot review applications or issue permits for projects previously rejected or under review by state authorities and requires annual reports on the impact and measures taken related to these federal actions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
This legislative proposal, known as S. 4348, aims to amend the Federal Power Act to prevent the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) from issuing permits for the construction or modification of electric transmission facilities within a state if the state objects. Essentially, this bill seeks to empower state governments and protect local landowners, specifically farmers, from federal decisions that might impose electric transmission facilities on their lands. The bill is introduced with the intention to prevent conflicts between national infrastructure goals and local interests, organizing federal processes to respect state opposition to certain projects.
Summary of Significant Issues
One significant issue brought forward by the bill is the potential hindrance of necessary infrastructure developments due to its prohibition on FERC's ability to review applications that a state is currently processing or has denied. This could delay critical infrastructure advancements that are sometimes needed for the broader public good, especially in energy transmission.
The language regarding what constitutes "identical or substantially similar" applications is also vague, potentially causing legal disputes between state and federal authorities. This ambiguity could lead to differing interpretations and implementation of the bill across various states.
Additionally, the bill attempts to ensure landowners and agricultural producers are "adequately compensated," but it fails to define what constitutes as adequate, leaving room for disputes and inconsistency in compensatory measures.
Furthermore, the bill's purpose section refers to protecting against "national efforts to site electric transmission facilities," a broad term that might cause interpretations issues about which specific national initiatives are targeted.
Public Impact
Broadly, this bill could have both protective and obstructive impacts on the public. On one hand, it emphasizes the rights of states and individual landowners, ensuring local voices are considered in the siting of electric transmission lines. This could foster a sense of empowerment and protection among communities worried about federal encroachment on state and personal property rights. On the other hand, creating hurdles in the approval process for electric transmission facilities may delay improvements in national infrastructure, potentially impacting energy distribution and possibly leading to inefficiencies or energy shortages.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Farmers and Landowners: These stakeholders would likely be positively impacted by the bill, as it serves to protect their rights against federal siting of electric transmission facilities on their land without state approval. This ensures state-level input and potentially more favorable outcomes for individuals.
State Governments: The bill strengthens state authority by barring federal actions over direct state objections, reinforcing state control over local land use decisions. This may increase state responsibilities in managing energy infrastructure while also empowering state decision-making in projects affecting their regions.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC): The agency's role could become more limited, potentially affecting its ability to streamline and execute national energy transmission projects, possibly reducing its operational efficiency in implementing broad-scale electrical grid improvements.
Energy Industry: Companies involved in building and managing electric transmission facilities might face additional challenges and delays, as the bill could lead to prolonged state reviews and increased litigation over project approvals. This could increase costs and impact their ability to meet national energy demands efficiently.
Overall, while the bill reinforces state rights and protects local stakeholders, it also introduces complexities and potential delays in developing and maintaining essential energy infrastructure. These effects will need careful consideration to balance local interests with national energy goals.
Issues
Section 3: The prohibition in subsection (a)(5)(2)(B) on the Commission reviewing applications if a similar application is being reviewed by a state could hinder necessary infrastructure developments, potentially prolonging important projects.
Section 3: The language concerning what constitutes 'identical or substantially similar' applications in subsection (a)(5)(2)(A) is vague, which could lead to legal disputes or differing interpretations between federal and state authorities.
Section 3: The criteria for 'adequate compensation' for landowners and agricultural producers mentioned in subsection (a)(4)(C) is subjective and lacks clear guidelines, leading to potential disputes on what is considered adequate.
Section 2: The term 'objection of State regulators' lacks specificity, potentially leading to ambiguity in how state objections are defined and measured, causing confusion between state and federal powers.
Section 4: The definition of 'committees of jurisdiction' might lead to jurisdictional disputes, potentially causing delays or conflicts within legislative processes.
Section 4: There is no clear methodology for assessing the effects on private landowners, farmers, and agricultural producers, raising concerns over consistency and fairness in evaluating impacts.
Section 2: The broad term 'national efforts to site electric transmission facilities' needs clarification to ensure the targeted efforts are clear and specific, avoiding overbroad or unintended applications of the law.
Section 4: Ambiguity in terms like 'minimize,' 'compensate,' and 'benefit' could lead to varying interpretations and inconsistent application of the bill’s provisions related to affected individuals.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill is about its title, allowing it to be referred to as the “Protecting Our Farmers from the Green New Deal Act.”
2. Purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The purpose of this section is to protect farmers and landowners by making sure electric transmission lines can't be built on their land without the approval of State regulators. This aims to prevent national projects from overriding local objections.
3. Siting of interstate electric transmission facilities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to the Federal Power Act focus on the process of approving sites for interstate electric transmission facilities. They clarify that if a state doesn't have the authority to approve the siting, certain requirements must be met, such as minimizing impacts on landowners and ensuring benefits exceed harms. Additionally, the federal commission cannot review applications if a state has already denied or is reviewing a similar application.
4. Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is required to submit an annual report to specific Congressional committees, detailing its actions under the Federal Power Act. The report must explain any negative impacts on private landowners and farmers, how those impacts were considered, and the steps FERC has taken to minimize them, provide compensation, and ensure affected people benefit from related projects.