Overview

Title

To require plain language and the inclusion of key words in covered notices that are clear, concise, and accessible to small business concerns, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make sure that important notices for small businesses are easy to read and understand by using simple words. It also wants these notices to have certain words that make them easy to find, helping small businesses know when there are chances to get work.

Summary AI

The bill S. 4341, titled the "Plain Language in Contracting Act," aims to ensure that notices related to small business concerns are easy to understand. It requires these notices to be clear, concise, and in line with federal plain language guidelines. Additionally, the notices should include key words to help small businesses easily identify them when looking for contract opportunities. The Small Business Administration Administrator is tasked with issuing rules to implement these requirements within 90 days of the bill's enactment.

Published

2024-05-15
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-05-15
Package ID: BILLS-118s4341is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
467
Pages:
3
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 136
Verbs: 36
Adjectives: 44
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 21
Entities: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.34
Average Sentence Length:
31.13
Token Entropy:
4.75
Readability (ARI):
18.15

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The legislation titled "Plain Language in Contracting Act" (S. 4341) aims to mandate that all federal notices concerning small business contracts are written in clear, concise language. It seeks to make these notices more accessible according to federal plain language guidelines. The bill was introduced in the U.S. Senate on May 15, 2024, by Ms. Ernst and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.

The primary goal of this bill is to ensure that small business owners can easily find and understand notices published by federal agencies. The bill specifies timelines for implementing these guidelines and defines the types of notices it encompasses. Additionally, it establishes that no extra funds will be appropriated to implement this act.

Significant Issues

While the bill's intentions to simplify access to federal contract opportunities for small businesses are clear, several significant issues warrant consideration:

  1. Subjectivity in Language Usage: The mandate to use federal plain language guidelines could lead to subjective interpretations. This may result in inconsistencies across agencies when determining what constitutes "clear and concise" language.

  2. Vagueness of Terms: The bill refers to the inclusion of "key words" in notices without detailing what these should be. This lack of specificity could lead to different agencies applying the term differently, impacting the visibility of some notices over others.

  3. Definition Ambiguity: The term "covered notice" is not specifically defined, potentially leading to confusion or disputes regarding what types of notices should comply with this act.

  4. Timeline Concerns: The 90-day timeframe for the Small Business Administration (SBA) to issue implementation rules may be too short, risking the creation of guidelines that are unclear or incomplete.

  5. Financial Constraints: By ensuring compliance with CUTGO (Cut-As-You-Go), the bill prohibits additional funding for these efforts, potentially restricting its practical implementation if unforeseen costs occur.

Impact on the Public

The public may broadly benefit from this legislation as it could foster transparency and accessibility in federal contracting opportunities, particularly for small businesses. By simplifying governmental notices, business owners who may lack formal training or legal resources could engage more readily with federal contract opportunities, potentially leading to increased economic participation and growth.

Impact on Stakeholders

Small Business Owners

On the positive side, small business owners could experience greater access to government contracts, redressing some barriers caused by complex bureaucratic language. However, potential inconsistencies in implementation might mean some business owners do not see the expected level of transparency and clarity.

Federal Agencies

Federal agencies are tasked with implementing these changes without additional funding, challenging them to improve communications within existing budgets. This constraint might impact their ability to swiftly and uniformly implement these measures.

Government Administration

For the SBA and other administrative bodies, the 90-day rulemaking period may present difficulties. The rushed timeline could lead to pressure, potentially resulting in ambiguous guidelines that could complicate rather than simplify processes.

Conclusion

Overall, the "Plain Language in Contracting Act" embarks on enhancing accessibility within federal contracting, a move that could potentially empower small businesses. However, ambiguity in the bill's language and constraints relating to implementation timelines and funding raise important issues that could influence its successful execution. Stakeholders should consider these factors carefully to realize the full intent of improved inclusivity and clarity in government dealings with small businesses.

Issues

  • The bill mandates the use of Federal plain language guidelines for covered notices, but these guidelines might be interpreted subjectively, leading to inconsistent application or interpretation across agencies. This issue is significant in Section 2.

  • The term 'key words' in Section 2 is vague, leading to potential inconsistencies in how different agencies implement this requirement, which may result in some notices being more visible than others.

  • The definition of 'covered notice' in Section 2 is lacking specificity, which could lead to disputes or confusion about what types of notices are included, impacting transparency for small businesses.

  • The 90-day timeline for the Small Business Administration's Administrator to issue rules, as stipulated in Section 2, may be insufficient, potentially resulting in vague or incomplete guidelines.

  • Compliance with CUTGO, as mentioned in Section 3, limits financial flexibility by not authorizing additional appropriations, which might restrict effective implementation if unforeseen costs arise.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section in the text refers to the name of a legal act, stating that it may be formally called the "Plain Language in Contracting Act."

2. Accessibility and clarity in covered notices for small business concerns Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that all notices related to small businesses be clear, concise, and aligned with Federal plain language guidelines, making them easy to find and understand for small businesses. It also requires the SBA Administrator to issue implementation rules within 90 days and defines "covered notice" and references the Small Business Act for further definitions.

3. Compliance with CUTGO Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that no additional money is allowed to be set aside or spent to implement this law or the changes it makes.