Overview
Title
To establish the Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park in the State of New York as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to make a new historical park in New York to remember a safe place where many people who had to leave their homes during World War II came to stay. The special park will be taken care of by a group that runs parks, and they will work with others to make sure people can learn about its history.
Summary AI
S. 432 proposes the establishment of the Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park in New York as part of the National Park System. The park aims to preserve and interpret the history of 982 refugees from World War II who found shelter at Fort Ontario from 1944 to 1946. The bill outlines that the Secretary of the Interior will manage the park, collaborate with state and public entities for educational purposes, and acquire land as necessary, while ensuring public access to significant historic resources. The bill also stipulates the creation of a management plan for the park within three years after funding is available.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park Establishment Act," seeks to establish a National Historical Park at Fort Ontario in New York. This bill, introduced by Senators Gillibrand and Schumer, is designed to recognize and preserve the historical significance of Fort Ontario, where 982 World War II refugees found shelter from August 1944 until February 1946. The park would be administered by the Secretary of the Interior and aims to protect, preserve, and interpret resources associated with these historical stories.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several notable issues that warrant attention:
Lack of Cost Transparency: There is no mention of the financial implications associated with establishing and maintaining the park. Without clarity on cost, stakeholders and the public may find it challenging to assess the potential financial impact, both in terms of government spending and resource allocation.
Undefined Timeline for Establishment: The absence of a specific timeline for determining when sufficient land has been acquired to establish the park could lead to indefinite delays. This uncertainty might hinder project planning and execution.
Vague Provisions for Cooperative Agreements: The provision allowing agreements with unspecified “public and private entities” lacks oversight and specific criteria. This vagueness raises concerns about potential favoritism or conflicts of interest.
Ambiguity in Land Acquisition: The bill restricts land acquisition from state-owned properties to donations only. This limitation may slow expansion efforts and impede the swift development of the park.
Potential Impact on the Public
The establishment of the Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park could serve as a significant educational resource, offering both residents and tourists insight into an important aspect of World War II history. The park's creation may boost local tourism, providing economic benefits to surrounding communities. However, the lack of cost transparency could translate to financial burdens borne by taxpayers, especially if the project exceeds budget predictions or requires additional funding.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Community and Local Economy: The park could act as a catalyst for local economic activity, nurturing tourism and related businesses. Local communities might witness increased visitor engagement and heightened interest in regional history.
Educational Institutions and Historians: Academics and students might find new opportunities for research and learning, as the park offers a preserved site for exploring refugee narratives and wartime history.
State and Local Governments: While the park could enhance historical preservation and tourism, state and local governments might need to mobilize resources to support infrastructure improvements necessitated by increased visitor traffic.
Potential Donors and Private Entities: Entities interested in contributing to the park's land or resources might find favorable opportunities to collaborate with the government. However, the lack of clear criteria for these partnerships could create uncertainties.
In conclusion, while the bill seeks to preserve an important historical site and potentially stimulate local economies, the surrounding issues related to cost, timeframes, and cooperative agreements highlight areas that may need careful consideration and revision to better manage expectations and outcomes for all stakeholders involved.
Issues
The bill lacks specificity and transparency regarding the estimated cost for establishing or maintaining the Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park. This omission makes it difficult for lawmakers and the public to evaluate the potential financial impact or risk of waste (Section 3).
The lack of a defined timeline for when the Secretary of the Interior must determine if a sufficient quantity of land has been acquired could result in indefinite delays in establishing the park (Section 3).
The provision that allows the Secretary to enter into cooperative agreements with undefined 'public and private entities' without clear criteria or oversight raises concerns about potential favoritism or conflicts of interest (Section 3).
The definition of 'map' is linked to a specific document number and date, which could lead to confusion if the document is updated or altered without updates to the definition. This could create legal ambiguities or challenges in the future (Section 2).
The term 'National Historical Park' is defined without specifying the purpose or scope, which could lead to ambiguity in its establishment or management, potentially impacting the park's effectiveness (Section 2).
Limiting land acquisition to donation when the land is owned by the State or its subdivisions restricts possibilities for expansion and could hinder the development of the park (Section 3).
Lack of clarity on the provision allowing the Secretary to interpret and restore resources 'in close proximity to' the park may extend influence beyond park boundaries without clear limits, leading to legal or community conflicts (Section 3).
Extraction of 'State' specifically referring to New York could imply a narrow focus or favoritism, raising concerns about whether considerations for including other states in similar initiatives have been appropriately explored (Section 2).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the bill, stating that it may be referred to as the "Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park Establishment Act."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines definitions for terms used in the act, including the term "map," which refers to a specific map related to the Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park, and the term "National Historical Park," which denotes the park itself. It also clarifies that "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of the Interior and "State" refers to the State of New York.
3. Establishment of Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill establishes the Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park in the state, with the aim to preserve and interpret the historical stories of 982 World War II refugees. The Secretary is responsible for managing the park, entering cooperative agreements, acquiring land, and developing a management plan in collaboration with the state, all subject to specific guidelines and limitations.