Overview
Title
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate the Nulhegan River and Paul Stream in the State of Vermont for potential addition to the national wild and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill talks about the possibility of making two rivers in Vermont, the Nulhegan River and Paul Stream, part of a special protection list to keep them clean and beautiful. It says that people need to study these rivers to see if they should be added to the list, but it doesn't say where the money for the study will come from or exactly when it will happen.
Summary AI
S. 432 proposes an amendment to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to potentially add the Nulhegan River and Paul Stream in Vermont to the national wild and scenic rivers system. The bill outlines a study process for examining these river segments, which include parts of the Nulhegan River and its tributaries, as well as Paul Stream and its tributaries, to determine their eligibility. The Secretary of the Interior is required to complete this study within three years after receiving funding and report the findings to Congress.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Nulhegan River and Paul Stream Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2023" seeks to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by designating certain segments of the Nulhegan River and Paul Stream in Vermont for study. This study will assess their eligibility for inclusion in the national wild and scenic rivers system. The segments consist of approximately 22 miles of the Nulhegan River and 18 miles of Paul Stream, intending to explore their potential for special protection under the Act. The responsibility for conducting this study is assigned to the Secretary of the Interior, who must submit a report to Congress within three years after funding is secured.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues are associated with the proposed amendments in the bill regarding the process and criteria for the study. Firstly, there is no specification concerning where the funding for the study will come from or how much will be needed. This lack of clarity could lead to fiscal challenges and delay the progress of the study. Secondly, the timeline for completion of the study is vague, depending on when the funds are made available, which could lead to delays or indefinite postponement. Furthermore, the bill does not outline any criteria or guidelines explaining why these particular river segments were chosen for the study, potentially raising questions about the selection process. Lastly, the bill does not address what outcomes or actions will occur following the study's conclusions, leaving the potential impact and effectiveness of these amendments uncertain.
Impact on the Public
This bill might impact the public by possibly expanding the areas protected under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, which could ensure environmental preservation and enhance recreational opportunities in these regions. By formally studying the Nulhegan River and Paul Stream, the bill could spotlight the ecological and recreational value of these natural resources and contribute to long-term environmental stewardship. However, any delay or lack of clarity in the process might hinder these potential public benefits, leaving communities unsure of the future status and protection of these river segments.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For environmental advocates and local communities in Vermont, the bill represents a positive step towards preserving vital natural landscapes. The inclusion of these river segments in a national study could potentially lead to enhanced environmental protection and increased public awareness about their importance.
On the other hand, stakeholders requiring clear and timely processes, such as state agencies, conservation organizations, and local businesses relying on river tourism, may find the lack of specifics—especially regarding funding and timing—problematic. The ambiguity can lead to planning challenges and postpone the potential benefits that could come from an expedited designation process.
Overall, while the bill positions itself as a promising environmental measure, the success of its intended outcomes hinges significantly on addressing the outlined issues related to funding, timelines, criteria justification, and post-study implications.
Issues
The section related to amendments to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Section 2) does not specify the source or amount of funds to be made available for the study of the Nulhegan River and Paul Stream segments. This could result in financial uncertainty and hinder the study's progress, which is significant for budget planning and resource allocation.
The timing for the completion of the study in Section 2 is contingent on an unspecified future date when funds are made available. This lack of a clear timeline might lead to delays or even indefinite postponement of the study, affecting the management and protection of these river segments.
In Section 2, there is no mention of criteria or guidelines for determining why the Nulhegan River and Paul Stream segments are worthy of study. This omission could lead to questions about the basis for their selection and whether other deserving segments were overlooked, which is important for ensuring a fair and transparent selection process.
The bill does not specify the potential implications or actions following the study's results (Section 2), leaving outcomes open-ended. This could lead to concerns about the effectiveness of the study and what measures will be enacted based on its conclusions, impacting long-term river management plans.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The short title of this bill is the “Nulhegan River and Paul Stream Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2023.”
2. Amendments to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendments to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act add certain segments of the Nulhegan River and Paul Stream in Vermont for study to determine their eligibility for special protection. The Secretary of the Interior is required to study these river sections and report the findings to Congress within three years of funding availability.