Overview

Title

To amend the Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to modify requirements for citizen suits under those Acts, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "Fair and Timely Citizen Suits Act of 2024" is a law that changes the rules for people who want to take legal action to protect the environment. It gives people more time before they can go to court, but also makes sure judges decide faster, but the exact timing isn't clear.

Summary AI

The bill, known as the "Fair and Timely Citizen Suits Act of 2024," proposes changes to the rules for citizen lawsuits under the Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the Endangered Species Act. It extends the required notice period for filing such suits from 60 days to 120 days and adds time limits for district courts and appellate courts to make final judgments on these cases. If a lawsuit is not filed within the specified time after the notice period, plaintiffs are prohibited from resubmitting their notice or starting the action.

Published

2024-05-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-05-09
Package ID: BILLS-118s4307is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,609
Pages:
7
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 411
Verbs: 95
Adjectives: 45
Adverbs: 18
Numbers: 90
Entities: 79

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.50
Average Sentence Length:
178.78
Token Entropy:
4.48
Readability (ARI):
87.48

AnalysisAI

To amend important environmental legislation like the Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the proposed bill S. 4307 seeks to make significant changes to the citizen suit provisions within these acts. Introduced by Senators Rubio and Cramer, the bill, aptly titled the "Fair and Timely Citizen Suits Act of 2024," aims to extend the required notice period before citizens can bring forth lawsuits from 60 to 120 days. Additionally, it strives to enhance the efficiency of the judicial process by mandating expedited judgment by courts.

General Summary of the Bill

At its core, the bill amends existing provisions allowing private citizens to sue for enforcement under several critical environmental laws. It extends the notice period required before initiating such legal actions, thereby modifying the timelines for resolving environmental disputes. Furthermore, it requires courts to determine these matters as quickly as practicable, adding a provision that appellate courts should complete reviews within a year of the district court's decision.

Summary of Significant Issues

This bill raises several significant issues due to its proposed changes. By doubling the notice period from 60 to 120 days, concerns arise regarding the potential delay in legal actions necessary for addressing environmental harms. Additionally, there is no clear justification provided in the bill for why this extension is necessary, which may lead to public skepticism.

The complex legal language used throughout the amendments may present a barrier to understanding for the general public, potentially impacting citizen engagement and participation in environmental protection efforts.

Furthermore, while the bill emphasizes expeditious court judgments, the lack of defined timelines could result in inconsistent applications across different cases, causing potential confusion or delay rather than resolution.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the extended notice period could have mixed impacts. On the one hand, it might allow more time for negotiations or for alleged violators to address the claims outside of court, potentially reducing the number of lawsuits. On the other hand, it could hinder citizens' ability to swiftly bring crucial environmental protection actions, potentially allowing ongoing harms to persist longer than currently allowed.

For specific stakeholders such as environmental advocacy groups, this bill may be seen as a hurdle that impairs their ability to act promptly against pollution or endangerment of species. Conversely, regulated industries might view the extension as a fairer timeline to address issues or reconcile differences before facing litigation.

While the provision for expedited court decisions aims to streamline the legal process, the vague requirement could result in disparities in how quickly cases are resolved. This disparity might affect stakeholders differently, depending on their resources and legal representation.

In conclusion, while the Fair and Timely Citizen Suits Act of 2024 aims to refine processes related to citizen lawsuits under significant environmental laws, its potential impacts and lack of detailed justification present areas of concern. The broader public, as well as particular stakeholders such as environmental and industrial groups, may have differing perspectives on the benefits and drawbacks posed by this legislative proposal.

Issues

  • The amendment changes the notice period for citizen suits from '60 days' to '120 days' across multiple acts, including the Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the Endangered Species Act of 1973. This extension could potentially delay legal actions that are necessary for protecting the environment and public health. Concerns may arise regarding whether this change benefits polluters by slowing down enforcement processes. (Section 2(a), 2(b), 2(c))

  • The language used in sections amending the Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the Endangered Species Act is complex legal jargon, which might reduce transparency and understanding for the general public and could affect citizen engagement or compliance. (Section 2(a), 2(b), 2(c))

  • The amendments enforce that district and appellate courts must render judgments 'as expeditiously as practicable,' but do not define what this timeframe is. This lack of clarity may lead to inconsistent interpretations and applications, potentially prolonging legal disputes or affecting their outcomes. (Section 2(a)(2), 2(b)(2), 2(c)(2))

  • There is no explicit explanation or justification given for why the notice period is being doubled from 60 to 120 days, which could raise concerns about the legislative intent or perceived lack of transparency regarding the necessity of this change. This omission may lead to public skepticism or opposition. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section provides the short title of the act, which is officially named the “Fair and Timely Citizen Suits Act of 2024”.

2. Citizen suits Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section from the bill amends multiple environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, to extend the notice period for citizen suits from 60 to 120 days. Additionally, it requires courts to render final judgments on actions under these sections as quickly as possible and within one year for appeals, if applicable.