Overview
Title
To modernize Federal firearms laws to account for advancements in technology and less-than-lethal weapons, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 4255 is a bill that wants to change some rules about guns to include new inventions like less-dangerous gadgets, so they aren't treated the same way as regular guns. This means these new gadgets wouldn't have extra taxes and rules that real guns do.
Summary AI
S. 4255 proposes updating federal firearms laws to include newer technology and less-than-lethal weapons, such as devices that do not project at high speeds and are not meant to cause serious injuries. The bill exempts these less-than-lethal projectile devices from certain restrictions, taxes, and regulations under current laws, including Title 18 of the U.S. Code and the National Firearms Act. This would mean manufacturers, producers, or importers could sell these devices without the tax typically imposed on firearms.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Law Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act," aims to update federal firearms laws to reflect advancements in technology and the emergence of less-than-lethal weapons. It was introduced in the Senate by Senator Sinema and co-sponsored by Senator Hagerty. The bill includes three primary components: defining and exempting certain less-than-lethal projectile devices from existing restrictions, exempting them from firearms and ammunition tax, and excluding them from certain stipulations under the National Firearms Act.
Significant Issues
The bill introduces the concept of "less-than-lethal projectile devices," categorizing them as devices not designed to expel a projectile faster than 500 feet per second and not intended to cause death or serious injury. The issues arise mainly from the ambiguity in the definition and the practical implications of such a definition.
Firstly, the absence of precise criteria for what constitutes "not likely to cause death or serious bodily injury" can lead to varied interpretations and enforcement issues. Secondly, the exemption of these devices from existing firearms taxes and regulations might lead to favoritism toward manufacturers and users of these products, potentially resulting in a loss of tax revenue without clear justification. Lastly, the reliance on cross-referencing legal documents for definitions can cause confusion or misinterpretation, especially if those definitions change over time.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the impact of such legislation might vary widely. On the one hand, the bill could encourage the development and usage of safer, less-lethal options by law enforcement, potentially contributing to reduced instances of lethal force in policing situations. On the other hand, the uncertainties in the bill's language and definitions could lead to loopholes or unintentional misuse, raising concerns about safety and the true non-lethality of these devices.
Stakeholder Impacts
Positive Impacts: - Law Enforcement Agencies: The bill could provide law enforcement agencies with greater flexibility and access to less-lethal technologies, potentially aiding in de-escalating situations without resorting to deadly force. - Manufacturers of Less-Than-Lethal Weapons: By removing certain tax barriers, the bill encourages the development and sale of non-lethal weaponry, potentially leading to business growth and innovation in this sector.
Negative Impacts: - Government Revenue: The exemption from firearms and ammunition taxes for these devices could lead to an adverse fiscal impact, with reduced revenue for public services or initiatives traditionally funded by these taxes. - Public Safety Concerns: The lack of clarity in defining "less-than-lethal" could result in devices that are potentially more dangerous than intended being misclassified, posing risks to public safety. If definitions and standards aren't uniformly applied, there could be inconsistent enforcement and varying levels of safety across jurisdictions.
In conclusion, while the intention behind modernizing firearms laws to incorporate less-lethal options appears beneficial, the ambiguous language and lack of clear public policy rationale in the bill raise notable concerns that warrant careful consideration and potential revision.
Issues
The definition of 'less-than-lethal projectile device' in Section 2 might be ambiguous due to the lack of clarity on what constitutes 'not likely to cause death or serious bodily injury' and the lack of a standardized test procedure for the velocity restriction, leading to potential inconsistent application or enforcement.
The exemption from firearms and ammunition tax for less-than-lethal projectile devices in Section 3 could be considered to favor manufacturers and users of these products without a clear public policy rationale or consideration of the potential loss of government revenue due to the tax exemption.
The referencing of 'less-than-lethal projectile device' in multiple sections to a definition in section 921(a)(38) of title 18, United States Code, might cause confusion or misinterpretation if the cross-referenced definition is not clear or changes over time (significant in Sections 3 and 4).
The legal language used in the bill, particularly in Section 4 regarding the amendment to the National Firearms Act, might be difficult for individuals without a legal background to understand, potentially leading to misinterpretations or lack of transparency for the general public.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill states its short title, which is the “Law Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act.”
2. Exemption of certain less-than-lethal projectile devices from restrictions under title 18, United States Code Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends title 18 of the United States Code to exclude certain less-than-lethal projectile devices from restrictions, defining them as devices that cannot shoot a projectile faster than 500 feet per second and are not designed to cause death or serious injury.
3. Exemption of certain less-than-lethal projectile devices from firearms and ammunition tax Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section exempts less-than-lethal projectile devices, such as certain non-lethal weapons and their ammunition, from the firearms and ammunition tax. This change will take effect for items sold after the law is enacted.
4. Exemption of certain less-than-lethal projectile devices from National Firearms Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section changes the Internal Revenue Code by stating that less-than-lethal projectile devices are not considered firearms, as defined in a different law, and are therefore exempt from certain regulations under the National Firearms Act.