Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to classify certain automatic fire sprinkler system retrofits as 15-year property for purposes of depreciation.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make it easier and cheaper to put fire sprinklers in tall buildings by letting owners pay less tax over time. It says new sprinklers can be counted differently for tax purposes to save money.

Summary AI

S. 4234 seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to classify certain retrofitted automatic fire sprinkler systems as 15-year property for depreciation purposes. This change aims to provide incentives for installing sprinkler systems by allowing owners faster depreciation, which could reduce costs for building upgrades. The definition of eligible sprinkler systems includes those installed in residential properties in buildings with floors above 75 feet and following specific fire protection standards. The bill affects installations made after the enactment date of the Act.

Published

2024-05-01
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-05-01
Package ID: BILLS-118s4234is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
481
Pages:
3
Sentences:
16

Language

Nouns: 151
Verbs: 32
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 20
Entities: 22

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
30.06
Token Entropy:
4.72
Readability (ARI):
16.57

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The proposed bill, titled the "High Rise Fire Sprinkler Incentive Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary aim is to reclassify specific automatic fire sprinkler system retrofits as 15-year property for depreciation purposes. This change is intended to incentivize property owners, particularly those owning high-rise residential buildings, to upgrade their fire safety systems. By allowing these installations to be depreciated over 15 years, it reduces the financial burden of these upgrades.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several key issues arise from this proposed legislation. Firstly, the complexity of the tax code references—especially in Section 2 where the term "15-year property" is specified—could impede comprehension for individuals not versed in tax law. The intricate language may result in confusion over the specifics of the benefits or requirements.

Another notable issue is the unclear language found in Section 2, subsection (c). The inclusion of “(E)(viii)39” does not conform to standard formatting practices, leading to potential misunderstandings in application and interpretation.

Moreover, the definition of what constitutes an "automatic fire sprinkler system retrofit property" hinges on the National Fire Protection Association 13 standards, which may be unfamiliar to many stakeholders. This reliance on technical benchmarks could necessitate further clarification or educational efforts for full comprehension.

The bill also restricts its applicability, as detailed in Section 2, subsection (d)(C)(ii), to buildings with an occupiable floor over 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. This height restriction could limit the intended benefits to a narrow range of structures without a clear justification for such specificity.

Finally, the effective date is vaguely stated, lacking detail on the precise timing post-enactment. This could create enforcement challenges and compliance ambiguities.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this bill could enhance public safety in high-rise residential buildings by motivating property owners to retrofit aging or inadequate fire sprinkler systems with modern installations. This change not only benefits residents by improving safety standards but also could lead to lower insurance premiums for building owners due to enhanced risk mitigation.

However, the complexity of tax code language might deter some from fully embracing the bill's benefits due to misunderstandings about the financial incentives.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For property owners and developers of high-rise buildings, this legislation offers a financial incentive that could lower the overall cost of fire safety upgrades. This may encourage them to voluntarily invest in upgrading their properties, resulting in safer living environments for tenants and improved property value.

On the other hand, the specificity of the bill's applicability might exclude smaller or lower-rise residential buildings, leaving these stakeholders without the benefits of a similar incentive. Additionally, fire safety equipment manufacturers could see increased demand for their products, potentially driving innovation and improvements in fire safety technology.

Overall, while the bill holds promise for improving safety in certain residential settings, its limited scope and potential barriers to understanding could restrict its effectiveness and reach.

Issues

  • The complexity of tax code references in Section 2, particularly subsections (a), (b), and (c), may hinder understanding and compliance for non-expert stakeholders. This could lead to misinterpretation of the bill's implications and its potential benefits.

  • The unclear language and possibly incorrect formatting in Section 2, subsection (c) regarding the 'Alternative system', which references '(E)(viii)39'. This lack of clarity might impact the correct application and interpretation of the provision.

  • The definition of 'automatic fire sprinkler system retrofit property' in Section 2, subsection (d) relies on technical standards (National Fire Protection Association 13) that may not be easily understood by those unfamiliar with industry standards, potentially necessitating additional explanation or reference for clarity.

  • The conditions in Section 2, subsection (d)(C)(ii) that limit applicability to buildings with floors over 75 feet above fire department access, without clear justification, might restrict the intended benefits of the bill to certain structures unnecessarily.

  • The effective date in Section 2, subsection (e) lacks specificity regarding timing post-enactment, which could lead to ambiguity in enforcement and compliance obligations among stakeholders, affecting the implementation of the policy.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section names the Act as the "High Rise Fire Sprinkler Incentive Act of 2024" and states that this will be its official title.

2. Classification of certain automatic fire sprinkler system retrofits Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill modifies the Internal Revenue Code to classify certain automatic fire sprinkler system retrofits as 15-year property for depreciation purposes. This includes defining what qualifies as an "automatic fire sprinkler system retrofit" and detailing that it must meet specific standards, be used in residential properties, and be installed in buildings with floors higher than 75 feet above the lowest fire department access. The changes apply to installations made after the act is enacted.