Overview

Title

To amend the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 to expand the boundary of Joshua Tree National Park.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make Joshua Tree National Park bigger by adding more land, just like adding a new piece to a puzzle, making the park a little larger and possibly more special.

Summary AI

S. 4227 seeks to amend the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 to increase the area covered by Joshua Tree National Park. The bill proposes adding approximately 17,842 acres to the park's boundary, as indicated on a map dated April 29, 2024.

Published

2024-05-01
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-05-01
Package ID: BILLS-118s4227is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
223
Pages:
2
Sentences:
6

Language

Nouns: 77
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 16
Entities: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.10
Average Sentence Length:
37.17
Token Entropy:
4.38
Readability (ARI):
19.90

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The "Joshua Tree National Park Expansion Act of 2024" is a legislative proposal aimed at modifying the boundaries of Joshua Tree National Park in California. Introduced by Senator Padilla and co-sponsored by Senator Butler, this bill seeks to amend the California Desert Protection Act of 1994. The proposed change involves the addition of approximately 17,842 acres of land to the existing park boundaries. This expansion is based on a map dated April 29, 2024.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary issues with the bill is the reference to a map that determines which land will be added to the park. The map is dated slightly ahead of the bill's introduction, raising questions about its availability and finalization. Without access to this map, there could be confusion or disputes about the precise location and boundaries of the newly incorporated land.

Additionally, this lack of accessible, specified information might lead to implementation challenges or interest conflicts among stakeholders. Potential legal and environmental considerations could arise due to the absence of clear delineations on the map.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill could have significant ecological and recreational impacts. Expanding Joshua Tree National Park might enhance conservation efforts by protecting additional land and habitats for native species, which could be seen as a positive development for environmental advocacy groups and nature enthusiasts. The expanded parkland might boost tourism, benefiting local economies by attracting more visitors interested in outdoor activities.

Conversely, it might also face opposition from groups concerned about land use, such as those in the agriculture or mining sectors, who might perceive the expansion as limiting their operational areas. Questions about the financial costs of maintaining the additional land and potential impacts on current land-use rights could generate further debate.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Stakeholders directly affected by this expansion include local communities, environmental groups, and industries operating in the region. Local residents and businesses might benefit from increased tourism and related economic activity. Nevertheless, they might also experience disadvantages if the expansion restricts access to resources or alters land use in economically significant ways.

Environmentalists are likely to view the expansion positively, as it supports conservation efforts and preserves natural habitats. However, the success of these efforts depends on the effective management and funding of the expanded park areas.

Industries reliant on land in the proposed expansion zones, such as agriculture or mining, might view the proposal as a hindrance to their operations. Concerns might also arise regarding potential regulatory changes or shifts in land values, leading to broader economic implications.

In summary, while the expansion of Joshua Tree National Park could lead to increased conservation and recreational opportunities, stakeholders have varying interests that weigh both positive and negative considerations depending on their respective priorities and concerns.

Issues

  • The expansion of Joshua Tree National Park by approximately 17,842 acres as per Section 2 is significant. The land expansion is based on a map dated April 29, 2024, which is in the future at the time of the bill's introduction. This raises issues about the map's availability, accuracy, and finalization, potentially leading to confusion or disputes over the exact boundaries to be added.

  • Section 2's reference to a map without providing it could cause ambiguity over the specific location and boundaries of the new lands being included in Joshua Tree National Park. This lack of specificity is important for legal and environmental considerations and might generate challenges in implementing the expansion or assessing its impact.

  • The expansion outlined in Section 2 involves adding substantial land to a national park, which may have political, ecological, and economic implications. Questions about the necessity of such an expansion, potential impacts on local communities, wildlife, conservation efforts, and financial costs should be considered and could be points of contention or interest to stakeholders.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the name of the law is the “Joshua Tree National Park Expansion Act of 2024”.

2. Expansion of Joshua Tree National Park Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 to expand Joshua Tree National Park by approximately 17,842 acres, as shown on a map dated April 29, 2024.