Overview
Title
To amend the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act to provide for additional procedures for families with children under the age of 6, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Lead-Safe Housing for Kids Act of 2024 aims to make homes safer for young children by having owners check for and fix dangerous lead paint quickly, and if not fixed, families can move to safer homes without waiting or losing help.
Summary AI
The bill S. 4210, titled the “Lead-Safe Housing for Kids Act of 2024,” amends the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act to improve procedures for families with children under 6 years old. It requires owners of certain housing to conduct risk assessments for lead paint hazards and to control identified hazards within 30 days. If lead hazards are not controlled, families can relocate to safer housing without facing waitlists, penalties, or gaps in assistance. The bill also authorizes funding for these measures from 2025 to 2029.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Lead-Safe Housing for Kids Act of 2024," is drafted to amend the existing Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act. Its primary aim is to introduce additional procedures and measures to protect families with children under the age of six living in federally assisted housing from the risks of lead-based paint. The proposed amendments necessitate that property owners perform risk assessments for lead hazards in these residences. Should any hazards be detected, they must be remedied within 30 days. The bill also outlines provisions for families to relocate to safer housing if these hazards are not addressed.
Significant Issues
A primary concern with the bill is the use of ambiguous language surrounding appropriations. The bill authorizes the provision of "such sums as may be necessary" without clearly defining budgetary limits or specific allocations. This vagueness could lead to concerns over unchecked government spending and challenges in maintaining accountability and transparency.
Another key issue is the additional administrative and financial burden imposed on housing authorities and property owners. The precise regulations and short timelines for risk assessments and remediation could increase operational complexities. The risk of inadequate management of these regulations could result in perceived wasteful spending.
Further, the bill grants discretionary power to the Secretary to allow exceptions to the newly enforced procedures. This provision lacks clarity and could result in inconsistent application across different jurisdictions, leading to potential legal challenges and inequalities.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
For the general public, particularly families with young children residing in federally assisted housing, the bill could have a significant positive impact by enhancing their living conditions and reducing the risks associated with lead paint exposure. The safe housing provisions present an important step forward in safeguarding children's health and well-being.
However, the bill may pose challenges for housing authorities and landlords. The new requirements could present logistical and financial hurdles, potentially affecting their ability to manage properties effectively. This might also trickle down to tenants, possibly influencing rental agreements or availability of housing.
Housing advocates might view the act as a positive stride towards improved public health standards, but they may also express concerns about the adequacy and implementation of these protections, especially in ensuring that the most vulnerable populations are not unduly burdened or left behind.
Closing Comments
While the bill aspires to address significant health concerns, it raises fundamental questions about budget management, regulatory clarity, and the equitable application of its provisions. Balancing these elements will be crucial to its successful implementation, ensuring that it provides the intended benefits to the public without imposing disproportionate challenges on other stakeholders.
Financial Assessment
The bill titled the “Lead-Safe Housing for Kids Act of 2024” aims to enhance the existing Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act by instituting additional procedures specifically targeted at families with children under the age of 6. Notably, the financial implications of the bill are highlighted through its specific provisions for the funding necessary to implement these changes.
Financial Allocations and Appropriations
The bill authorizes “such sums as may be necessary” to execute the amendments introduced by Section 2, for each fiscal year from 2025 to 2029. This phrase can be particularly ambiguous, as it leaves the exact amount of federal spending open-ended. This is commonly used in bills to provide flexibility in funding; however, it tends to raise questions about the extent of financial commitments it might entail and lacks stringent fiscal planning and definitive cost estimates.
Issues Related to Financial References
Ambiguity in Appropriations: Utilizing the phrase “such sums as may be necessary” poses potential risks of uncontrolled and undefined federal spending. This could lead to significant financial implications for the federal budget, as it does not set clear limits or stipulations on how much money should be allocated. This vagueness can be challenging for federal accountability and transparency, as there's no clear ceiling or financial oversight detailed within the bill.
Implementation Cost and Administration: The bill introduces new obligations for housing authorities and property owners to conduct risk assessments and control identified lead hazards swiftly. These administrative costs might increase significantly without specific budget allocations, potentially causing resource drainage or reallocation issues. Ensuring these newly mandated processes are funded adequately is crucial to prevent inefficiencies or wasteful expenditure.
Potential for Inconsistent Application: The ability for the Secretary to use discretion in granting exceptions might result in an uneven application of funding and resources, depending on jurisdictional interpretation. This could lead to legal inconsistencies and issues on how financial resources are managed across different regions.
Lack of Specific Implementation Details: The bill lacks detailed guidance on the mechanics of family relocation in cases where lead hazards remain uncontrolled, which might imply additional but undefined costs of moving and settling families. Without clear instructions, this can lead to operational complexities that may eventually heighten the financial burden on responsible entities or families themselves.
Oversight and Reporting: The absence of specified oversight or reporting requirements accompanying the appropriation potentially paves the way for the misuse or misallocation of funds. Public trust in these financial commitments might be undermined due to the lack of checks and balances typically expected with federal spending.
Overall, the financial elements of the bill, while essential for its purpose, expose some areas of concern relating to budgetary planning, transparency, and equitable implementation without explicit fiscal benchmarks. Addressing these gaps through more clarified appropriations and structured funding plans could enhance the bill's effectiveness in safeguarding public health while maintaining fiscal responsibility.
Issues
The authorization of appropriations in Section 3 uses the ambiguous phrase 'such sums as may be necessary', potentially leading to uncontrolled and undefined federal spending. This could have significant financial implications for the federal budget and raise concerns about accountability and transparency.
Section 2 introduces new regulations under the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act, which might lead to increased administrative costs and burdens on housing authorities or owners of covered housing. Without proper management or defined funding, this could be construed as wasteful spending.
The provisions in Section 2 for 'exceptions' based on the Secretary's discretion are vague and could result in inconsistent application or interpretation in different jurisdictions, leading to legal challenges or inequities in how the law is applied.
The amendment outlined in Section 2 refers to various sections of U.S. Code and federal acts without providing necessary context, which might make it difficult for individuals unfamiliar with these laws to comprehend the requirements and implications without additional research.
Section 2's clause on family relocation in emergency situations lacks specific implementation details, which could lead to inequities or inefficiencies in assistance distribution, affecting vulnerable populations due to operational complexities.
The bill lacks oversight or reporting requirements in Section 3, raising concerns about the potential for misuse or misinterpretation of funds, thereby impacting public trust or accountability in government spending.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the official name of the legislation is the "Lead-Safe Housing for Kids Act of 2024."
2. Amendments to the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act require property owners to conduct lead risk assessments for housing where young children under age 6 will live, especially if the housing receives federal assistance. If lead hazards are found, they must be fixed within 30 days, with specific exceptions allowed, and families affected may have the right to relocate to safer housing without extra costs or penalties if the hazards aren't addressed.
Money References
- Section 302(a) of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4822(a)) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting after “mortgage insurance” the following: “, tenant-based rental assistance under section 8(o) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)),”; (2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: “(4) ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES FOR FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 6.— “(A) RISK ASSESSMENT.— “(i) DEFINITION.—In this subparagraph, the term ‘covered housing’ means target housing, as defined in section 1004 of the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851b), that— “(I) is covered by an application for mortgage insurance or housing assistance payments under a program administered by the Secretary; or “(II) otherwise receives more than $5,000 in project-based assistance under a Federal housing program. “(ii) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Lead-Safe Housing for Kids Act of 2024, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations that— “(I) require the owner of covered housing in which a family with a child of less than 6 years of age will reside or is expected to reside to conduct an initial risk assessment for lead-based paint hazards— “(aa) in the case of covered housing receiving tenant-based rental assistance under section 8(o) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)), not later than 15 days after the date on which the family and the owner submit a request for approval of a tenancy or lease renewal, whichever occurs first; “(bb) in the case of covered housing receiving public housing assistance under the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.) or project-based rental assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f), not later than 15 days after the date on which a physical condition inspection occurs; and “(cc) in the case of covered housing not described in item (aa) or (bb), not later than a date established by the Secretary; “(II) provide that a visual assessment alone is not sufficient for purposes of complying with subclause (I); “(III) require that, if lead-based paint hazards are identified by an initial risk assessment conducted under subclause (I), the owner of the covered housing shall— “(aa) not later than 30 days after the date on which the initial risk assessment is conducted, control the lead-based paint hazards, including achieving clearance in accordance with regulations promulgated under section 402 or 404 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2682, 2684), as applicable; and “(bb) in accessible and alternative formats consistent with the requirements under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), and title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), provide notice to all residents in the covered housing affected by the initial risk assessment, and provide notice in the common areas of the covered housing, that lead-based paint hazards were identified and will be controlled within the 30-day period described in item (aa); and “(IV) provide that there shall be no extension of the 30-day period described in subclause (III)(aa). “(iii) EXCEPTIONS.—The regulations promulgated under clause (ii) shall provide an exception to the requirement under subclause (I) of such clause for covered housing— “(I) if the owner of the covered housing submits to the Secretary documentation— “(aa) that the owner conducted a risk assessment of the covered housing for lead-based paint hazards during the 12-month period preceding the date on which the family is expected to reside in the covered housing; and “(bb) of any clearance examinations of lead-based paint hazard control work resulting from the risk assessment described in item (aa) that show that the housing passed the clearance examination; “(II)(aa) if a lead-based paint inspection of the covered housing determined that lead-based paint was not present in the covered housing; or “(bb) from which all lead-based paint has been identified and removed and clearance has been achieved in accordance with regulations promulgated under section 402 or 404 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2682, 2684) or under this section, as applicable; “(III) if— “(aa) lead-based paint hazards are identified in the dwelling unit in the covered housing in which the family will reside or is expected to reside; “(bb) the dwelling unit is unoccupied; “(cc) the owner of the covered housing, without any further delay in occupancy or increase in rent, provides the family with another dwelling unit in the covered housing that has no lead-based paint hazards; and “(dd) the common areas servicing the new dwelling unit have no lead-based paint hazards; and “(IV) in accordance with any other standard or exception the Secretary deems appropriate based on health-based standards. “(B) RELOCATION.
3. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows for the allocation of money as needed to implement the changes made by section 2, for the fiscal years from 2025 to 2029.