Overview
Title
To establish artificial intelligence standards, metrics, and evaluation tools, to support artificial intelligence research, development, and capacity building activities, to promote innovation in the artificial intelligence industry by ensuring companies of all sizes can succeed and thrive, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024" is a plan to set clear rules and guidelines for using smart computer programs safely, helping different companies make cool new things with these programs, and making sure everyone in different countries can follow similar rules when using them.
Summary AI
S. 4178, known as the "Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024," seeks to create a comprehensive framework for developing and implementing artificial intelligence (AI) standards, metrics, and evaluation tools in the United States. The bill proposes the establishment of the Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute to support safe AI development and encourage private sector innovation across varied company sizes. It promotes international cooperation for AI standards and addresses potential regulatory barriers to AI innovation while emphasizing collaboration among federal agencies, national laboratories, and public-private partnerships. The bill also aims to foster AI research, including initiatives for public data and identifying grand challenges to expedite AI development in key economic sectors.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024 is a substantial legislative proposal aimed at shaping the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the United States. The bill stipulates the establishment of standards, metrics, and evaluation tools to support AI research, development, and capacity-building initiatives. It seeks to promote innovation in the AI industry by ensuring businesses of all sizes can thrive and by minimizing regulatory barriers. The act outlines several initiatives, including the creation of an Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute to standardize best practices and foster international cooperation for AI development.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns raised by the bill is the broad and, at times, ambiguous language, which might lead to inconsistent interpretations and implementations. For example, terms like "maximize the potential of AI" and "transformational advancements" lack specific definitions, leaving room for varied interpretations. The bill's reliance on highly technical language and references to other legislative documents for definitions further complicates accessibility for stakeholders without legal or technical expertise.
The establishment of the Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute without a clear budget presents potential challenges in ensuring financial responsibility. The broad authority given to the Director to accept gifts could lead to ethical concerns, particularly regarding conflicts of interest without a robust framework for transparency. Moreover, the bill's lack of specific guidelines or criteria in forming international coalitions, managing funding, and evaluating program success might lead to inefficiencies or wasteful spending.
Impact on the Public
The bill could significantly impact the public by fostering innovation and ensuring the safe development of AI technologies, which are becoming increasingly integral in daily life. By setting industry standards and promoting international cooperation, the bill aims to position the U.S. as a leader in AI development. However, the lack of specific measures for addressing AI-related equity and fairness concerns might lead to public criticism, particularly from groups advocating for more inclusive AI solutions. Moreover, the bill's complex language and references might alienate the public and experts not versed in legislative jargon, affecting transparency and public engagement.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For businesses, especially smaller ones, the bill’s intention to create an environment where companies of all sizes can prosper is promising. However, the ambiguous language regarding collaboration and funding allocation may disproportionately benefit larger entities with more resources to navigate these complexities. International relationships could also be impacted, as the bill restricts coalition participation to countries meeting certain technological advancement criteria, potentially alienating emerging markets that could offer valuable perspectives or contributions.
Additionally, the AI Safety Institute's establishment might bolster trust in AI technologies, benefiting both developers who adhere to new standards and consumers who use safer products. Nonetheless, the provisions regarding privacy protections and the prohibition on designing AI systems to prevent disparate impacts might limit efforts to address systemic biases within AI systems, affecting stakeholders focused on inclusivity and fairness in technology.
In summary, while the bill aims to advance AI technology innovatively and safely, its lack of clarity and defined parameters poses challenges that might require careful consideration and revision to ensure its effectiveness and fairness across the board.
Financial Assessment
The "Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024" includes several financial references that are crucial in understanding its potential impacts and addressing related issues identified in the bill.
Financial Allocations and Budget References
The bill outlines specific financial allocations, most notably in the section establishing the Foundation for Standards and Metrology. It authorizes the transfer of funds ranging from $500,000 to $1,250,000 per fiscal year from amounts appropriated to the Secretary of Commerce starting in the fiscal year 2025. These funds are intended to support the foundation's role in advancing technical standards and metrology. This allocation is directly mentioned in sections 303 and 10236.
The appropriations for the Foundation for Standards and Metrology signify a dedicated funding initiative to foster collaboration and development in AI-related standards. However, the bill does not specify exact budgets for other critical initiatives like the Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute, leading to concerns over the potential for inadequate funding or wasteful expenditure without defined fiscal oversight frameworks. This lack of specificity in funds could result in operational challenges for the institute, as highlighted by the issues section indicating the need for more detailed budgetary plans.
Ethical Concerns and Financial Governance
The Act permits the Director of the Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute to accept gifts from public and private sources under certain ethical guidelines. While this can augment funding for AI projects, this broad authority raises ethical considerations about potential conflicts of interest. Without clear guidelines on how these gifts are managed, tracked, and disclosed, there is a risk that financial decisions could be influenced by stakeholders who provide funding, thus compromising the integrity of the institute’s objectives.
International Coalitions and Unchecked Spending
Regarding the formation of international coalitions on AI standards, the bill lacks specific funding details, which could lead to unchecked or wasteful spending. Given the complexity and cost involved in coordinating such global efforts, the absence of financial guidelines or limitations might result in inefficient use of resources. This insight aligns with the concerns raised about the necessity for detailed budgetary and procedural transparency in international collaborations.
Expansion of Bureaucratic Structures
The bill allows an increase from 15 to 30 in the hiring capacity for critical technical experts within the National Institute of Standards and Technology. While expanding expertise can enhance AI capabilities, it also incurs additional costs that require justification to avoid needless expansion of bureaucracy. The absence of rationale or economic projections concerning this increase could potentially lead to perceptions of inefficiency or misallocation of financial resources.
In conclusion, while the bill proposes substantial financial actions to support AI innovation, the lack of clearly defined and detailed financial structures raises concerns about fiscal responsibility, accountability, and potential conflicts of interest. To address these issues, the bill would benefit from incorporating comprehensive financial plans and oversight mechanisms that ensure transparency and efficiency in fund management.
Issues
The prohibition on conducting 'disparate impact or equity impact assessments prior to deployment' of AI systems may limit the ability to address potential biases and ensure fairness, potentially leading to future legal challenges. (Section 304)
The establishment of the 'Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute' without a clear budget or funding structure could result in wasteful spending or inadequately funded operations, raising concerns about financial responsibility. (Section 101)
The broad authority granted to the Director to accept gifts from public and private sources could raise ethical concerns, especially relating to conflicts of interest, and lacks specific procedural guidelines to manage transparency. (Section 101)
The prohibition on designing AI to prevent disparate impacts on protected classes contradicts broader equity goals, potentially leading to criticisms that the bill does not adequately address fairness in AI technology. (Section 304)
The section lacks specific funding details for the establishment of international coalitions on AI standards, which raises concerns about unchecked or wasteful spending, especially given the complex nature of international collaborations. (Section 111)
The bill's use of technical language and references to other legislative documents for definitions may make it challenging for stakeholders without technical or legal expertise to comprehend, affecting accessibility and accountability. (Section 3)
The Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium lacks explicit criteria for selection, potentially leading to perceived or actual favoritism or bias in stakeholder inclusion. (Section 101)
The expansion from 15 to 30 experts in the hiring authority section lacks justification or rationale, potentially leading to concerns about unnecessary or wasteful expansion of bureaucracy. (Section 302)
The definition of 'appropriate committees of Congress' in the testbed program explicitly limits oversight to specific committees, which may exclude others with relevant expertise, impacting comprehensive oversight. (Section 102)
There are no clear metrics or criteria provided for evaluating the success of the various AI testbed programs, potentially leading to ambiguous assessments and lack of accountability in measuring effectiveness. (Section 102)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024 outlines its purpose and structure in its first section. It includes a short title, a detailed table of contents listing key components such as voluntary AI standards, international cooperation for innovation, and AI research and development areas.
2. Sense of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress believes that rules about artificial intelligence should help develop and use AI in a way that benefits everyone, including both private companies and the government.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for several terms related to artificial intelligence and technology. These include "agency," "artificial intelligence," "AI blue-teaming and red-teaming," and "generative AI," among others, and it also covers concepts like "critical infrastructure" and "watermarking" for digital content verification.
101. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute is established to help the private sector and government develop best practices for assessing AI systems and improve the quality of government services using AI. The Institute will create guidelines and standards for AI development, provide technical help, hire experts, and work with international partners to ensure safe AI technologies.
102. Program on artificial intelligence testbeds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes a program to test artificial intelligence (AI) systems, requiring coordination between various governmental entities and private companies to research, evaluate, and manage potential risks of AI technologies. It outlines various responsibilities and activities, including creating evaluations and metrics for AI systems, consulting with industry and academia, and ensuring that sensitive information remains protected.
103. National Institute of Standards and Technology and Department of Energy testbed to identify, test, and synthesize new materials Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the establishment of a testbed by the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Energy, through which they will identify, test, and synthesize new materials to advance material science and support advanced manufacturing using artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. It emphasizes the need for public-private partnerships, and the use of resources from National Laboratories and the private sector to ensure the success of this initiative.
104. National Science Foundation and Department of Energy collaboration to make scientific discoveries through the use of artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy are collaborating to make new scientific discoveries by using artificial intelligence, as well as its integration with other emerging technologies like quantum computing and robotics, to benefit the U.S. economy. To achieve this, they may form partnerships with private companies and use resources from various sectors, including National Laboratories, the private sector, and academic institutions.
105. Progress report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director of the Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute must work with the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Energy to send a report to Congress within one year of this Act becoming law. This report will cover the progress on implementing the rules outlined in this part of the law.
111. International coalition on innovation, development, and harmonization of standards with respect to artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes a plan where the U.S. Secretaries of Commerce and State, and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy aim to work with allies to advance and agree on international standards for artificial intelligence. They will ensure participating countries are technologically advanced, adhere to open standards, and uphold intellectual property protections, while involving private-sector input from partner countries.
112. Requirement to support bilateral and multilateral artificial intelligence research collaborations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director of the National Science Foundation is tasked with supporting collaborations, both with different countries and with multiple countries together, to advance artificial intelligence research. These collaborations must align with U.S. research priorities, promote innovation, ensure international cooperation, and include security measures to protect intellectual property.
121. Comptroller General of the United States identification of risks and obstacles relating to artificial intelligence and Federal agencies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a report to Congress within a year, detailing any legal barriers to innovation in artificial intelligence (AI). This report must include examples of relevant laws, challenges faced by federal agencies in applying these laws, and the current use of AI in government, along with recommendations for boosting AI innovation.
201. Public data for artificial intelligence systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan to identify and prioritize federal data that can be used to develop artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the U.S. It requires input from public stakeholders and agency cooperation, with attention to privacy and national security, while providing guidelines for creating and sharing these datasets for AI research.
202. Federal grand challenges in artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that a list of priorities for advancing artificial intelligence in the U.S. be established and updated periodically, focusing on areas like microelectronics, advanced manufacturing, and border security. It also requires Federal agencies to initiate prize competitions or other investments to support these priorities, ensuring they benefit the U.S. economy and take advantage of industry and philanthropic expertise.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The "Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024" outlines the establishment of voluntary standards, evaluation tools, and international cooperation for AI, along with funding for research, development, and capacity-building activities, aiming to support AI safety and reduce regulatory barriers while enhancing research security.
2. Sense of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress believes that policies related to artificial intelligence should focus on maximizing its potential to benefit everyone, including both private individuals and public organizations.
100. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section defines key terms related to artificial intelligence, such as what an artificial intelligence model and system entail, as well as definitions for critical infrastructure, federal and national laboratories, a foundation model, and a testbed.
101. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute is being established within the National Institute of Standards and Technology to create best practices for the secure and reliable use of AI systems. It will work with international partners, support testing and development of AI safety measures, and form a consortium to collaborate with experts and stakeholders in AI-related fields.
22B. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute is established to help develop best practices and standards for assessing and securing AI systems, including efforts like red-teaming and blue-teaming. It also involves creating tools and methodologies to detect and label synthetic content, while ensuring that entities controlled by certain foreign governments are restricted from accessing institute resources.
102. Interagency coordination and program to facilitate artificial intelligence testbeds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the creation of a program to test and evaluate artificial intelligence systems, involving collaboration between government bodies, labs, and private companies. It also specifies privacy protections for confidential business information, sets evaluation metrics, and allows for voluntary testing while ensuring no forced disclosure of sensitive data, with the program set to end seven years after the law's enactment.
103. National Institute of Standards and Technology and Department of Energy testbed to identify, test, and synthesize new materials Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Department of Energy are working together to improve materials science and energy technology by using artificial intelligence and other new technologies. They plan to support these advancements with partnerships, resources from various programs and laboratories, and through collaborations with industry and academia to help boost the U.S. economy.
104. Coordination, reimbursement, and savings provisions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Commerce must ensure that activities under this law do not duplicate those of the Department of Energy and certain industries. Advanced resources from the National Laboratories can be shared with other entities if they pay for them, unless a waiver is given. The law does not change existing rules or let the Secretary of Commerce or other officials use the Department of Energy's funds for their own purposes.
105. Progress report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology to submit a progress report to Congress within one year of the bill's enactment. This report should cover details about agreements and project plans related to the sections specified, as well as any other relevant information deemed necessary.
111. International coalitions on innovation, development, and alignment of standards with respect to artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines responsibilities for U.S. agencies to collaborate with other countries on international standards for artificial intelligence, ensuring that any cooperation includes strong protections for intellectual property and aligns with global standards for transparency and collaboration. It also specifies that China cannot join these partnerships until it complies with international trade commitments, detailing the process for reconsideration if compliance is met.
121. Comptroller General of the United States identification of risks and obstacles relating to artificial intelligence and Federal agencies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Comptroller General of the United States is required to report to Congress on the challenges and barriers related to the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) within a year of this Act's enactment. The report must address existing laws that impact AI innovation, evaluate how the government is using AI to enhance services, and suggest legislative or administrative steps to encourage AI development.
201. Public data for artificial intelligence systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill introduces a new section aimed at boosting artificial intelligence (AI) development in the U.S. by creating a prioritized list for developing public data sets. It involves cooperation among federal agencies and stakeholders, emphasizing privacy, national security, and whether data sets are unlikely to receive private funding.
5103A. Public data for artificial intelligence systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines measures for advancing artificial intelligence (AI) development by creating a prioritized list of federal investments into curated public datasets. It mandates collaboration among government agencies, public engagement, adherence to privacy laws, and coordination with existing data initiatives, while also requiring a report on best practices and challenges encountered in the process.
202. Federal grand challenges in artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the establishment of a program to create significant challenges related to artificial intelligence, organized and managed by various U.S. government agencies. The goal is to accelerate AI development through prize competitions that promote innovation in areas like microelectronics, cybersecurity, and manufacturing, while ensuring participation and results are publicly available and beneficial to U.S. interests.
5107. Federal grand challenges in artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes a program to award prizes for advancements in artificial intelligence, with the goal of solving specific challenges in areas like microelectronics, cybersecurity, and border security. The section outlines the administration of the program, eligibility criteria, agency responsibilities, and reporting requirements, and it specifies that the initiative will end five years after the enactment of the Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024.
301. Research security Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that any activities allowed by this Act must follow the guidelines set out in certain previous laws, specifically the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act and the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.
302. Expansion of authority to hire critical technical experts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section increases the number of critical technical experts that the National Institute of Standards and Technology can hire from 15 to 30 and extends the sunset date for this hiring authority to December 30, 2035.
303. Foundation for Standards and Metrology Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill establishes the Foundation for Standards and Metrology, a nonprofit organization to support the National Institute of Standards and Technology in its mission to advance measurement science, technical standards, and technology collaboration. The Foundation will engage with various sectors to promote research, standard development, and technology commercialization, while being overseen by a Board of Directors and subject to guidelines ensuring its independence from the federal government.
Money References
- “(q) Funding; authorization of appropriations.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2025 to the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to section 10211, the Director may transfer not less than $500,000 and not more than $1,250,000 to the Foundation each such fiscal year. “(r) Definitions.—In this section: “(1) BOARD.—The term ‘Board’ means the Board of Directors of the Foundation, established pursuant to subsection (i). “(2) DIRECTOR.—The term ‘Director’ means the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
10236. Foundation for Standards and Metrology Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes a nonprofit corporation called the Foundation for Standards and Metrology. Its mission is to support the National Institute of Standards and Technology in areas like technical standards and emerging technologies. The Foundation will collaborate with various sectors and run activities such as research support and facility expansion. It will be governed by a Board of Directors and must comply with rules on integrity and financial disclosure. Additionally, it can receive funds but must maintain transparency and accountability.
Money References
- (q) Funding; authorization of appropriations.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2025 to the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to section 10211, the Director may transfer not less than $500,000 and not more than $1,250,000 to the Foundation each such fiscal year.
304. Prohibition on certain policies relating to the use of artificial intelligence or other automated systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that, within 7 days of the act's passage, the President must ensure a technology directive is issued to prevent federal agencies from implementing policies that promote certain controversial concepts via artificial intelligence or automated systems, including any ideas suggesting racial or gender superiority, or strategies that require changes to AI systems for equitable outcomes.
305. Certifications and audits of temporary fellows Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, agencies are required to ensure that temporary workers, known as "temporary fellows," do not perform essential government tasks. Before starting work on projects involving advanced technologies, both the temporary workers and agency leaders must sign a certification to this effect. The agency must send this certification to specific committees and the Office of Management and Budget. Additionally, the agency's inspector general must conduct yearly audits on the use of these temporary fellows and report the findings to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget.