Overview

Title

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of the Cahokia Mounds and surrounding land in the States of Illinois and Missouri, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill asks for a special study to be done on some historic mounds in Illinois and Missouri to see how important they are and if they should become new national parks. The study will use money already available to the National Park Service and should be done within a year.

Summary AI

S. 4164 is a bill that authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to perform a special resource study of the Cahokia Mounds and surrounding lands in Illinois and Missouri. The study aims to evaluate the significance of these areas, explore the possibility of designating them as part of the National Park System, and consider other preservation options by involving government and private organizations. The bill outlines that the study will be conducted in accordance with legal standards and will provide cost estimates for different preservation strategies, with results to be reported to Congress within one year of funding. Existing funds from the National Park Service are to be used for this study.

Published

2024-04-18
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-04-18
Package ID: BILLS-118s4164is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
938
Pages:
5
Sentences:
21

Language

Nouns: 292
Verbs: 51
Adjectives: 40
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 38
Entities: 91

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.99
Average Sentence Length:
44.67
Token Entropy:
4.83
Readability (ARI):
22.91

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the “Cahokia Mounds Mississippian Culture Study Act” (S. 4164), aims to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of the Cahokia Mounds and nearby lands in Illinois and Missouri. The Cahokia Mounds are a historical site recognized for their significance to the Mississippian culture, a pre-Columbian civilization that was once the largest and most complex north of Mexico. This study will evaluate the national importance of Cahokia, consider its inclusion in the National Park System, and explore various preservation options.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the prominent areas of concern in the bill is the reference to section 100507 of title 54, United States Code, without an accompanying explanation. Lack of clarification on this legal reference may hinder understanding for those not familiar with the specific code section, requiring additional effort to discern its implications.

The timeline for the study, which mandates completion within one year upon funding availability, raises questions about its practicability. The expansive scope of the study could make this timeframe challenging, risking inadequate or rushed findings.

Funding also poses a concern, as the bill stipulates that existing resources of the National Park Service will finance the study. This allocation could strain resources already earmarked for other operations or projects within the Park Service.

Additionally, the bill requires consultation with a broad range of stakeholders but lacks specific criteria for selecting participants. Without clear guidelines, the selection process may be susceptible to bias, potentially skewing the study's outcomes.

Finally, the bill does not specify criteria for assessing the "suitability and feasibility" of incorporating the Study Area into the National Park System. This omission allows for subjective interpretation, which could lead to inconsistent decision-making.

Potential Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, this legislation addresses the cultural and historical importance of Cahokia Mounds, offering the potential for increased public awareness and educational opportunities regarding pre-Columbian civilizations in North America. If the site is designated as a national park, it could provide economic benefits through tourism and related activities.

However, the constraints on funding may impact the National Park Service's ability to fulfill other responsibilities effectively. Strained resources could affect current projects and park operations, potentially diminishing visitor experiences at other sites.

Local stakeholders, including communities surrounding Cahokia Mounds and Indigenous groups, could see both benefits and challenges. Increased recognition and preservation efforts may support cultural heritage initiatives and foster economic growth through tourism. Conversely, concerns may arise regarding the consultation process and ensuring Indigenous voices are adequately represented in decisions impacting historically significant sites linked to their heritage.

In summary, while the bill could play a crucial role in preserving Cahokia Mounds for future generations, the outlined concerns require careful consideration to ensure thorough, unbiased, and sustainable outcomes.

Issues

  • The requirement for the study to be conducted in accordance with section 100507 of title 54, United States Code, is not elaborated upon in the bill. This reference may obscure understanding without additional context or access to the referenced law, which could be inconvenient for stakeholders or the general public. (Section 4)

  • The study is required to be completed and reported to the Senate and House committees within one year of funding availability. This timeline might be unrealistic depending on the study's scope and complexity, potentially leading to rushed or incomplete evaluations. (Section 4)

  • The funding for the study is specified to come from existing National Park Service funds, which may strain their resources depending on the study's cost. This could impact other projects or ongoing operations within the National Park Service. (Section 4)

  • The bill mandates consultation with a wide range of entities and individuals but lacks criteria for selecting these parties. This leaves room for potential bias or favoritism in the consultation process, which could affect the study's outcomes. (Section 4)

  • There are no specific criteria provided for determining the 'suitability and feasibility' of designating the Study Area as a unit of the National Park System. This lack of guidance could lead to subjective interpretations and inconsistent decision-making. (Section 4)

  • The section on the short title is very brief and does not provide specific details about the Act's provisions, leading to potential ambiguity regarding its scope and implications. Additional context or provisions may be necessary for a thorough understanding. (Section 1)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it may be referred to as the "Cahokia Mounds Mississippian Culture Study Act."

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress notes that the ancient city of Cahokia was a significant urban center of the Mississippian culture, with many earthen mounds built between 900 and 1400 AD, making it a historically important site recognized as a National Historic Landmark and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. At its peak, Cahokia spanned 6 square miles, housed 10,000 to 20,000 people, and was a larger city than many in Europe at the time.

3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines key terms for the Act, explaining that the "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of the Interior, and the "Study Area" includes the Cahokia Mounds site, nearby land in certain Illinois and Missouri counties, thematically connected satellite sites, and several specific mounds such as Mitchell Mound and Emerald Mound.

4. Special resource study Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is tasked with conducting a special study of a designated area to evaluate its importance, assess if it should be part of the National Park System, and explore preservation options. This study will involve consultation with various entities, cost estimation, and must be completed within a year using existing National Park Service funds. The results and recommendations will be reported to the Senate and House Committees.