Overview

Title

To require the Secretary of Energy to identify, analyze, and share available data for the purpose of improving the reliability and resilience of the electric grid, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

In the "GRIData Act of 2024," the government wants to make sure our electricity works better, even when things get tough, by using special data and information; they plan to spend $10 million to help and will work with different groups to share what they learn.

Summary AI

S. 4140, titled the "Grid Reliability and Integrated Data Act of 2024" or the "GRIData Act of 2024," aims to enhance the reliability and resilience of the electric grid in the United States. The bill requires the Secretary of Energy to work alongside various stakeholders to identify, analyze, and share data concerning the electric grid's reliability and resilience, focusing on rural, low-income, disadvantaged, and energy communities. It leverages existing data and seeks to improve models for long-term reliability, resource adequacy, and planning, taking into account emerging technologies and potential cost and security risks. The bill authorizes $10 million for its implementation and encourages collaboration without imposing additional costs on participating utilities.

Published

2024-04-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-04-17
Package ID: BILLS-118s4140is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
3,187
Pages:
18
Sentences:
62

Language

Nouns: 964
Verbs: 225
Adjectives: 172
Adverbs: 26
Numbers: 95
Entities: 120

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.42
Average Sentence Length:
51.40
Token Entropy:
5.22
Readability (ARI):
28.34

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill, known as the "Grid Reliability and Integrated Data Act of 2024" or "GRIData Act of 2024," aims to enhance the reliability and resilience of the United States electric grid. The legislation mandates the Secretary of Energy to identify, analyze, and share key data to improve the electrical infrastructure, especially focusing on rural areas, low-income communities, disadvantaged communities, and energy communities. The bill calls for the collaboration with various entities, the establishment of a steering committee, and the creation of centralized platforms for data sharing. It also allocates $10 million for the first fiscal year to support the implementation of the bill's activities.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the main concerns is the reliance on definitions from multiple external laws and standards without providing detailed explanations within the bill itself. This complexity could lead to confusion and inconsistencies, especially if those referenced laws change over time. Moreover, the bill grants considerable discretion to the Secretary of Energy in defining key terms such as "disadvantaged community" and "low-income community." This flexibility could result in ambiguities until specific definitions are provided.

Another issue is the exclusion of the Federal Advisory Committee Act from the steering committee oversight, which could limit transparency and accountability in decision-making processes. Additionally, there is concern about the potential for excessive spending, as the $10 million budget lacks a detailed breakdown. The use of complex language and technical terms without sufficient explanation might also limit accessibility for the general public, reducing their ability to engage in informed debate.

Potential Impact on the Public

The bill is generally aimed at enhancing the resilience of the electricity grid, which could lead to fewer outages and an overall more dependable power supply. This is particularly important in the face of extreme weather events and emerging threats that could disrupt electrical services. Improved data sharing and analysis may lead to smarter, more efficient energy planning and infrastructure investments, potentially lowering costs in the long term.

However, the complexity and technical nature of the bill might make it challenging for the public to fully understand its implications or participate in related discussions. The lack of transparency and specific criteria in some sections could potentially lead to an uneven distribution of benefits, favoring certain areas or communities over others.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For utility companies and other entities involved in electricity distribution, the bill could mean increased collaboration and data sharing requirements, which might improve operational efficiencies but could also pose challenges related to data privacy and security. If well-managed, this could enhance their capacity to serve consumers effectively.

Rural and underserved communities are likely to be positively impacted due to the bill's focus on improving grid reliability in these areas. However, these communities might also face negative implications if the definitions and criteria for inclusion remain unclear, potentially leading to inconsistent application of the intended benefits.

Regulatory bodies might see an increased workload as they implement and oversee the new requirements and standards set by this bill. They will need to ensure that the prescribed data sharing and analysis methods do not compromise the security of sensitive energy data.

Overall, while the bill sets out commendable goals for updating and securing the nation's energy infrastructure, its successful implementation will require clear definitions, careful budget management, and appropriate oversight to balance the benefits and address potential challenges for all stakeholders involved.

Financial Assessment

The "Grid Reliability and Integrated Data Act of 2024," also known as S. 4140, addresses various aspects of the electric grid, including its reliability and resilience, particularly for underserved communities. This bill includes a specific financial appropriation which is key to its implementation.

Financial Appropriation

The bill authorizes $10,000,000 to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy for the first fiscal year following the date of enactment. This sum is intended to facilitate the activities described in Section 3 of the bill, which includes the identification, analysis, and sharing of data related to the electric grid. The funds are set to remain available until expended, offering flexibility in their use over a potentially extended period.

Financial Allocation Concerns

A significant issue raised in the discussion of this appropriation is the lack of a detailed breakdown of how the $10,000,000 will be allocated, which could give rise to concerns about wasteful spending. Without clear guidelines or a transparent framework for the use of these funds, there is the potential for expenditures on nebulous or overly broad activities, which might not directly contribute to the bill's objectives of improving the electric grid's reliability and resilience.

Section 3 specifies that the activities should be carried out in collaboration with various stakeholders, minimizing incremental costs on participating utilities. However, the omission of detailed financial guidelines leaves both utilities and stakeholders uncertain about their potential financial responsibilities.

Potential for Mismanaged Spending

The absence of explicit allocation criteria for the $10,000,000 creates a scenario where funds might not be optimally utilized. The bill leaves extensive discretion to the Secretary of Energy, which, without transparency and accountability measures in place, could result in spending decisions that do not fully align with the goals outlined, such as addressing issues in rural, low-income, and disadvantaged communities.

Moreover, the steering committee is excluded from oversight mechanisms typically provided by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which could further obscure how funds are managed. This lack of oversight may lead to concerns about favoritism or decisions that do not reflect the broader interest of enhancing grid reliability.

Summary

Ultimately, the financial reference within the "GRIData Act of 2024" reveals an essential allocation for its enactment but simultaneously highlights potential issues related to transparency and accountability. Strategic and well-defined spending plans are critical to ensure that the appropriated $10,000,000 effectively addresses the electric grid's resilience and reliability challenges, with special attention to the identified priority areas.

Issues

  • The lack of detailed breakdown for the $10,000,000 appropriated for the first fiscal year (Section 3) raises concerns about potential wasteful spending and may be perceived as excessive without clear allocation guidelines.

  • The reliance on definitions from multiple external laws and standards (Section 2) can create ambiguity and complexity, potentially leading to confusion or inconsistencies, especially if those definitions are amended or repealed.

  • The bill grants the Secretary of Energy significant discretion in defining key terms like 'disadvantaged community' and 'low-income community' (Section 2), which could lead to ambiguities and potential legal challenges until explicit definitions are provided.

  • The exclusion of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) from the steering committee (Section 3) removes oversight and accountability, prompting concerns about transparency and the risk of undue influence or favoritism in decision-making processes.

  • The complex language and use of technical terms without sufficient explanation (Section 3) limit accessibility and understanding for the general public, potentially affecting informed public debate and engagement.

  • The specificity of the requirements for weather data (Section 3) might be practically difficult to achieve, such as the demand for 30-year chronologically consistent data, which could delay implementation or lead to increased costs.

  • The bill specifies collaboration with unspecified 'other agencies' (Section 3) while lacking clarity on selection criteria, leaving decisions open to favoritism and potential exclusion of relevant stakeholders.

  • The preference for fewer centralized and integrated websites (Section 3) lacks criteria for decision-making, which might impact transparency and reduce objectivity in data dissemination.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act specifies the short title, stating that it can be referred to as the “Grid Reliability and Integrated Data Act of 2024” or simply the “GRIData Act of 2024.”

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, various terms are defined to clarify their meanings within the context of the legislation. These definitions include technical measurements related to electricity, such as different indexes that track power interruptions, as well as terms like "Department," "energy community," "reliability," and "resilience." Additionally, the Secretary of Energy is tasked with defining terms related to community characteristics like "disadvantaged community," "low-income community," and "rural area," considering existing definitions from other laws.

3. Identification, analysis, and sharing of data Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a plan for the Secretary to collaborate with various entities to gather, analyze, and share data to improve the reliability and resilience of the electric grid, especially in areas like rural or disadvantaged communities. It includes creating a steering committee, reporting findings to Congress, using existing data platforms, considering future data needs, and ensuring activities are cost-effective, with $10 million authorized for implementation without imposing extra costs on utilities.

Money References

  • (f) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $10,000,000 for the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, to remain available until expended.