Overview
Title
To withhold Federal funding from any college or university that employs illegal aliens on campus.
ELI5 AI
This bill says that if a college hires people who are not allowed to live in the country, it won't get any money from the government.
Summary AI
S. 4090, also known as the “Enforcing the Rule of Law on Campus Act,” aims to stop colleges and universities in the United States from receiving federal funding if they employ illegal aliens on campus. The bill clearly states that any institution of higher education employing individuals unlawfully present in the country, in violation of immigration laws, will be considered ineligible for federal funds. The legislation was introduced in the Senate by Mrs. Blackburn, along with co-sponsors Mr. Braun, Mr. Hawley, and Mr. Cotton.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the “Enforcing the Rule of Law on Campus Act,” seeks to prohibit colleges and universities from receiving federal funding if they employ illegal aliens. This legislative measure defines such aliens as those unlawfully present in the United States, as per the Immigration and Nationality Act. The bill was introduced in the Senate by Mrs. Blackburn and co-sponsored by Mr. Braun, Mr. Hawley, and Mr. Cotton. As of now, the bill has been referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions for further consideration.
Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from this bill, primarily concerning its implications, potential fairness, and the clarity of its provisions. Firstly, the bill targets institutions of higher education, which raises questions about its fairness and impartiality. This aspect could lead to controversy among educational and civil rights groups.
The bill also lacks clarity, particularly regarding the steps institutions must take to demonstrate compliance with the law. The phrase "policy or practice of employing aliens who are unlawfully present" is vague and could lead to varied interpretations and inconsistent enforcement. Moreover, there is no specified procedure for colleges to appeal decisions that render them ineligible for federal funding. This absence of a due process mechanism presents potential ethical and legal dilemmas.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could impact the public by influencing the financial stability and operations of numerous colleges and universities. The potential ineligibility for federal funding could affect the availability and quality of education at institutions found in violation, possibly limiting educational opportunities for students nationwide.
Additionally, the legislation may intensify discourse surrounding immigration policy in the U.S., affecting public opinion and societal attitudes towards immigrants, specifically those in educational settings. The broader public might witness heightened debate over the balance between enforcing immigration laws and maintaining educational access and equity.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For colleges and universities, the bill presents a potential financial threat that could lead to significant operational challenges. Schools relying on federal funding might face difficult decisions about staffing and enrollment, which could, in turn, impact educators, staff, and students.
Students attending these institutions could face increased tuition rates or reduced services if their schools lose federal funding. The academic community might also experience tension as debates about immigration intersect with issues of academic freedom and institutional autonomy.
Immigrant communities may perceive this bill as an unfriendly gesture, potentially exacerbating fears about their place in educational institutions and society at large. Conversely, proponents of stringent immigration enforcement could view the bill as a necessary step in ensuring compliance with federal laws.
In summary, while the bill aims to address immigration enforcement within educational settings, it raises significant questions about fairness, clarity, and equity that warrant careful consideration and debate.
Issues
The bill in Section 2 targets institutions of higher education specifically, which raises concerns about the fairness and impartiality in how the law is applied and enforced, potentially causing significant controversy among educational organizations and civil rights groups.
Section 2's lack of clarity on the measures or criteria that must be met by institutions to demonstrate compliance or non-compliance can lead to inconsistent application and confusion across different colleges and universities.
The term 'policy or practice of employing aliens who are unlawfully present' in Section 2 is vague and may require further definition to ensure consistent and fair application, posing potential legal challenges.
Section 2 does not specify any procedures for institutions to appeal or contest their ineligibility for federal funding, raising due process concerns and potentially leading to significant legal and ethical debates.
The bill's punitive approach in Section 2, without offering remediation or rectification measures for institutions that want to comply after being found in violation, may be seen as excessively harsh and could fuel political and ethical criticisms.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes the short title, which is "Enforcing the Rule of Law on Campus Act."
2. Ineligibility of colleges and universities that employ illegal aliens to receive Federal funding Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Any college or university that hires illegal aliens in the U.S. will not be eligible to receive federal funding.