Overview

Title

An Act To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, as the Dianne Feinstein Post Office.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to change the name of a post office in San Francisco to the "Dianne Feinstein Post Office" so people will call it that from now on.

Summary AI

S. 4077 is a bill that proposes to name a specific post office located at 180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, as the “Dianne Feinstein Post Office.” This designation would be used in any legal or official reference to this postal facility in the United States. The bill has passed the Senate as of November 19, 2024.

Published

2024-11-19
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Engrossed in Senate
Date: 2024-11-19
Package ID: BILLS-118s4077es

Keywords AI

dianne feinstein post office united states postal service san francisco post office designation renaming public facilities senate bill legislative process s. 4077 postal facility naming 118th congress

Sources

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
211
Pages:
4
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 85
Verbs: 12
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 9
Entities: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.26
Average Sentence Length:
30.14
Token Entropy:
4.12
Readability (ARI):
17.04

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill, referenced as S. 4077 in the 118th Congress, aims to designate the United States Postal Service facility located at 180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, as the "Dianne Feinstein Post Office." This legislative action is straightforward in its objective: to rename and thereafter reference this postal facility by the designated name in all official U.S. documents and records.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several noteworthy issues:

  1. Commemorative Legislation: Naming a post office after a specific individual could be perceived as an effort to honor that person, possibly sparking debate over preferential treatment. The bill highlights the broader issue of how public honors are accorded and whether such acts are subject to equitable and transparent processes.

  2. Financial Implications: The act of renaming a post office involves changing signs and updating records, which could incur costs. The bill does not address who will bear these costs or how they will impact the budget of the involved entities.

  3. Selection Criteria: The bill lacks transparency regarding the criteria used to choose individuals who receive this type of honor. This absence of clarity might lead to questions about fairness and transparency in the decision-making process.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the bill is unlikely to significantly impact the daily lives of the general public. The renaming of a single postal facility is a symbolic gesture rather than a structural change to postal operations, so it should not affect postal services or the convenience for customers using that facility.

However, the impact on specific stakeholders might be more nuanced:

  • Dianne Feinstein and Her Supporters: This legislative action serves as a tribute to Ms. Feinstein's contributions and legacy, potentially benefiting her supporters and bolstering her historical recognition. It may also enhance community pride for those who have been positively influenced by her career.

  • Local Government and USPS: The local government and the USPS may face logistical and financial tasks related to the renaming, including changes to signage, updating logistical systems, and communication efforts to inform the public of the change.

  • Public Perception: The community and other stakeholders might have varied reactions based on their views of Dianne Feinstein and the appropriateness of such honors. While some might see it as a prestigious recognition, others may view it skeptically if perceived as politically motivated.

In summary, the bill is largely symbolic, honoring a notable individual by designating a public facility in her name. Most concerns center on fairness in recognition and the financial responsibilities tied to name changes, which might raise wider questions about how public commemorations are managed.

Issues

  • The designation of the post office as the 'Dianne Feinstein Post Office' could be seen as an attempt to honor or favor a particular individual, raising potential controversy or perceptions of preferential treatment. This issue pertains to Section 1.

  • The bill does not address potential costs associated with renaming the post office, such as updates to signs, maps, and documents. Financial implications of this kind of designation are not covered, which could raise concerns. This issue pertains to Section 1.

  • There is a lack of clarity about the criteria used to select individuals for the honor of having a post office named after them. This could lead to questions about the fairness or transparency of the process. This issue pertains to Section 1.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Dianne Feinstein Post Office Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section designates the United States Postal Service facility at 180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, as the "Dianne Feinstein Post Office." Any mention of this postal facility in U.S. laws, maps, or official documents will now refer to it by this new name.