Overview
Title
To support local educational agencies in addressing the student mental health crisis.
ELI5 AI
The bill is like a big plan to help schools have more helpers for kids' feelings, so they can feel better and learn better. It gives schools money to hire more of these special helpers, especially in places that really need them.
Summary AI
S. 4041 aims to address the student mental health crisis by expanding and diversifying school-based mental health services. The bill establishes grants for educational institutions to create partnerships with local schools, increasing the number of qualified mental health providers in schools. It also provides grants to high-need school agencies to help recruit, hire, and retain such providers, thereby improving access to mental health services for students. The legislation is focused on improving mental health services infrastructure in educational settings, particularly in underserved areas.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Creating Access and Resources in Education for Student Mental Health Act" or the "CARE for Student Mental Health Act," aims to address the growing student mental health crisis in U.S. schools. Introduced in the Senate, the bill seeks to bolster mental health support within educational settings by increasing, diversifying, and enhancing access to school-based mental health services. It provides for the establishment of grants aimed at strengthening the pipeline for mental health providers in educational institutions and supporting high-need educational agencies in recruiting and hiring these professionals.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the critical issues within the bill is the use of the phrase "such sums as may be necessary" for authorizing appropriations without a specified cap. This creates potential for unchecked financial expenditures, raising concerns of fiscal ambiguity. Furthermore, the criteria for identifying a "high-need local educational agency" rely on complex and potentially unclear locale codes and quartile rankings, making it difficult for agencies to accurately identify their eligibility. The bill also grants considerable discretionary power to the Secretary of Education, which could result in inconsistent grant application processing and funding allocations. Additionally, the reliance on existing laws for crucial definitions complicates comprehension without cross-referencing, which may not be easily accessible to all stakeholders.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill's intent to improve access to mental health services in schools addresses a critical need, as mental health is increasingly recognized as a vital component of overall student well-being and academic success. By increasing the number of qualified mental health professionals in schools, the bill could provide students with much-needed support, potentially reducing barriers to mental health care. This enhancement may lead to improved student outcomes, including better mental health, increased school attendance, and higher achievement levels.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
Students: The primary beneficiaries of this legislation are students who will have increased access to school-based mental health services. This can reduce mental health stigma by normalizing counseling and support within the educational setting.
Local Educational Agencies (LEAs): Particularly high-need LEAs could benefit from funding to recruit and retain mental health professionals, addressing personnel shortages and diversifying provider options to meet students' multicultural needs.
Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs): These institutions may gain increased support through prioritization in grant allocations, aiding in diversifying the workforce and promoting inclusivity.
Potential Negative Impacts
Fiscal Concerns: The lack of specified spending limits could lead to excessive expenditures that may not be sustainable in the long term. This could place pressure on budgets, potentially diverting funds from other necessary areas.
Inequitable Distribution: The process for renewing grants and the allocation of funds could lead to concentrated funding among a few institutions, limiting broader systemic capacity-building efforts.
Administrative Overhead: The allocation of funds for administrative and technical assistance could detract from direct services if not proportionately and transparently managed.
In conclusion, while the CARE for Student Mental Health Act addresses urgent student mental health needs by expanding resources in educational settings, it also presents challenges that require careful consideration and clarification to ensure effective implementation that equitably benefits all stakeholders.
Issues
The phrase 'such sums as may be necessary' is used in both Sections 4 and 5 for authorization of appropriations, which creates financial ambiguity and potential for unchecked spending given the lack of a specified spending cap.
Section 4 allows a single eligible institution to receive multiple grants, which might result in concentrated funding and limit resource distribution to a broader range of institutions, contrary to the goal of widespread capacity building.
The criteria for defining a 'high-need local educational agency' in Section 3 rely heavily on locale codes and quartile rankings, which can be unclear and may be difficult to interpret or verify without detailed guidance.
The grant program described in Section 5 emphasizes subjective criteria for determining 'high-quality applications,' potentially leading to inconsistent or biased grant distributions.
In Sections 4 and 5, significant discretionary power is granted to the Secretary for determining eligibility and grant renewal, which could lead to inconsistent applications and decisions across different educational institutions.
The lack of detailed accountability measures in Sections 4 and 5 for assessing the effective use of funds increases the risk of inefficient or potentially wasteful spending.
Section 6 references the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, requiring external context that may not be readily accessible to all stakeholders, making it difficult for them to understand the requirements fully.
The definition of 'school-based mental health services provider' in Section 3 relies on another existing law, requiring cross-referencing that complicates comprehension for individuals without legal expertise.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act provides its short title: the "Creating Access and Resources in Education for Student Mental Health Act," also known as the "CARE for Student Mental Health Act."
2. Purposes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the goals of the Act, which are to address the student mental health crisis by increasing and diversifying mental health services within schools and helping local education agencies recruit and maintain a diverse range of school-based mental health providers.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, several important terms are defined: terms from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, what qualifies as an "eligible institution," and what constitutes a "high-need local educational agency." Additionally, it defines an "Indian tribe," a "minority-serving institution," a "school-based mental health partnership," and what a "school-based mental health services provider" means. Each definition relates to specific educational criteria, partnerships for mental health services, or recognized groups and institutions.
4. Strengthening the pipeline of school-based mental health services providers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section aims to increase the number and diversity of mental health providers in schools by offering grants to eligible institutions to form school-based mental health partnerships. These grants can be used to create or expand training programs, provide financial assistance, and collaborate with public agencies to ensure more trained professionals are available to support students' mental health needs.
5. School-based mental health services grant program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The School-based Mental Health Services Grant Program is a scheme to help schools with high needs hire, keep, and broaden the backgrounds of mental health service providers to better support students' mental health. It allocates funds for recruiting, hiring, and retaining mental health professionals, especially in rural areas, and supports activities like professional development and telehealth services, while requiring annual reports on how the grants are used to improve mental health services in schools.
6. Rule Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The rule in this section states that any school receiving a grant or participating in a program funded by this Act must follow the same rules as schools getting funding under a specific part of the 1965 education law.