Overview
Title
To amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to expend amounts in the Colorado River Dam fund, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 4016 is a plan that lets the government use money from a special fund to take care of Hoover Dam, like fixing or cleaning it, and they have to talk with certain people who help run the dam while doing so.
Summary AI
S. 4016 seeks to amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act to allow the Secretary of the Interior to use money from the Colorado River Dam fund. This money, including certain non-reimbursable amounts, can be used for activities related to the operations, maintenance, and improvements at Hoover Dam, as well as cleanup actions. The use of these funds will be done in consultation with the Boulder Canyon Project contractors as stated in the Hoover Power Allocation Act of 2011.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation is designed to amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act, aiming to give the Secretary of the Interior the authority to utilize funds from the Colorado River Dam fund. This would cover various activities involving the Boulder Canyon Project and Hoover Dam, such as operations, maintenance, investigations, cleanup actions, and capital improvements. The intended changes include allowing for the expenditure of funds recovered on a non-reimbursable basis for these purposes. The proposal also highlights some form of interaction with Boulder Canyon Project contractors identified under the Hoover Power Allocation Act of 2011.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the significant issues found within the bill pertains to the broad authority it grants the Secretary of the Interior to expend funds. Without clearly defined constraints or specific oversight mechanisms, there may be potential risks for financial mismanagement, lack of transparency, and accountability concerns. The phrase transformed from "review and approval" to merely "in consultation with" Boulder Canyon Project contractors is ambiguous and might lead to confusion over the level of control or consent needed for expenditures, thereby creating possible legal and administrative challenges.
Additionally, the title of the bill, "Help Hoover Dam Act," is considered vague, which might not effectively convey the scope and intentions of the legislation. Such a title may lead to misunderstandings about the bill's objectives and its implications, potentially affecting public and legislative perception.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, this bill may have several implications. On the positive side, improved operations and maintenance at the Hoover Dam could translate into more reliable water and power resources, which benefit many communities and industries dependent on these resources. However, without stringent oversight, there is a risk that funds could be misallocated or spent inefficiently, potentially wasting taxpayer money and decreasing public trust in governmental operations.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, such as contractors linked to the Boulder Canyon Project, might experience direct impacts from this bill. The level of engagement required with these contractors during the use of funds is not entirely clear, which could affect how these stakeholders interact with the government and influence project outcomes. Depending on the final implementation of the bill, stakeholders might either gain more involvement in decision-making processes or face increased uncertainty in their roles and responsibilities.
Overall, while the intention to facilitate improvements at Hoover Dam appears beneficial, the lack of specific details and the potential for misinterpretation or misuse of the provided authority present substantial risks. Careful attention to providing transparency, accountability, and detailed legislative language could help mitigate these issues.
Issues
The amendment in Section 2 gives broad authority to the Secretary of the Interior to expend funds without clearly defined constraints, which could lead to potential misuse or misallocation of funds, impacting financial accountability and transparency.
Section 2 lacks specific oversight mechanisms or reporting requirements for the expenditure of funds, raising concerns about transparency and accountability, which are crucial for public trust and effective governance.
The phrase 'review and approval of*in consultation with*' in Section 2 is ambiguous, potentially creating legal and administrative confusion regarding the level of control or interaction required with the Boulder Canyon Project contractors, affecting the clarity of implementation.
Section 1's title, 'Help Hoover Dam Act', is vague and does not specify the purpose or scope of the act, creating potential ambiguity that could affect public perception and legislative intent.
Section 1, titled 'Short title', does not provide sufficient information to determine if any spending might be wasteful or favor a particular organization or individual, which is crucial for assessing the bill's ethical implications.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section specifies the short title of the Act, allowing it to be referred to as the “Help Hoover Dam Act”.
2. Authorization to expend amounts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment allows the Secretary of the Interior to use funds recovered on a non-reimbursable basis for various authorized activities like operations, maintenance, and improvements at the Boulder Canyon Project and Hoover Dam. These expenditures require consultation with Boulder Canyon Project contractors as identified in a 2011 law.