Overview

Title

To amend the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to add certain land to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to add new land to a special protected nature area in Colorado, making it bigger, and lets the people in charge make sure the land stays safe while respecting rules for native tribes.

Summary AI

S. 3985 aims to modify the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 by adding approximately 6,817 acres of land within the Routt National Forest to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness. This area will be designated as the "Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition." The bill allows for continued recognition of treaty rights and permits traditional tribal uses in the addition. It also grants the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to manage fire, insects, and diseases in the area according to existing wilderness law provisions.

Published

2024-11-21
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-11-21
Package ID: BILLS-118s3985rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
568
Pages:
4
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 195
Verbs: 33
Adjectives: 21
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 41
Entities: 50

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.24
Average Sentence Length:
40.57
Token Entropy:
4.69
Readability (ARI):
22.13

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled the "Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act" proposes amendments to the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993. Specifically, this legislation seeks to expand the Sarvis Creek Wilderness by adding approximately 6,817 acres of land within the Routt National Forest. The bill provides that this additional land, referred to as the "Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition," will be managed as wilderness land immediately following the enactment of this law. Moreover, the bill outlines administrative provisions related to the wilderness status of the land, emphasizing the preservation of treaty rights for Indian Tribes and the management of environmental factors such as fire, insects, and diseases by the Secretary of Agriculture.

Summary of Significant Issues

A notable issue with the bill relates to its financial implications. The absence of a detailed cost analysis raises concerns about the potential budgetary impacts, including the costs of managing the expanded wilderness area. Without clear financial details, there is a risk of inefficient or unexpected federal expenditures.

Another issue arises from the ambiguous language used to describe the boundaries of the newly designated wilderness area. Terms like "generally depicted" could lead to confusion or disputes over the exact size and location of the land, potentially impacting various stakeholders. Additionally, the text relies heavily on cross-referencing other legal documents, which may create comprehension challenges for individuals unfamiliar with the legal context.

The bill also allows the Secretary of Agriculture to manage fire, insect, and disease threats with considerable discretion. The lack of specific guidelines could result in unequal enforcement or decision-making. Furthermore, while the bill acknowledges the rights of Indian Tribes to use the land for traditional purposes, the language is open-ended and could benefit from further clarification.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act is designed to enrich the preservation of natural landscapes by adding more land to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness. This legislative action represents a commitment to protecting and maintaining public lands for ecological and recreational purposes.

However, the financial implications of the bill are unique challenges. The public may benefit from increased recreational opportunities and improved conservation efforts, but the potential for unchecked spending could burden taxpayers if inefficiencies arise in land management.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For environmentalists and outdoor enthusiasts, the expansion of the Sarvis Creek Wilderness constitutes a positive development, promoting conservation and offering larger natural preserve areas. This initiative aligns with broader ecological goals of maintaining biodiversity and protecting habitats.

Local communities and stakeholders, including possibly affected businesses, could experience varying impacts. While some may benefit from the boost in recreational tourism, others may be concerned about land use restrictions that could limit certain economic activities.

Indian Tribes, explicitly recognized in the bill, may find new opportunities to engage with these lands for cultural and religious practices. However, the generality of the language concerning tribal uses could lead to uncertainties or require additional negotiations to fully realize these opportunities.

Overall, while the bill's intentions are oriented towards conservation and cultural respect, the practical complexities regarding implementation, fiscal responsibility, and stakeholder engagement require careful consideration and further clarification to avoid unintended consequences.

Issues

  • The designation of new wilderness land (Section 3) lacks a detailed cost analysis which could pose financial impact concerns. Without understanding potential budgetary effects, this legislation may lead to inefficient use of federal resources or unexpected expenditures for land management and maintenance.

  • The language in Section 3 regarding the land being 'generally depicted' is ambiguous and could lead to legal disputes or confusion regarding the precise boundaries of the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition.

  • There is an absence of a comprehensive impact assessment in Section 3, leaving potential effects on stakeholders, including local communities and ecosystems, inadequately addressed.

  • The permitting language in Section 4 allowing the Secretary of Agriculture broad discretion over activities for fire, insect, and disease control is vague and may lead to arbitrary decision-making or lack of accountability due to insufficiently defined guidelines.

  • The provisions in Section 4 related to Indian Tribes' access for traditional, religious, and cultural purposes are open-ended, potentially leading to interpretation issues or misuse without clearer definitions.

  • The legislative language in Section 3 relies heavily on cross-references to other legal documents, making it complex and potentially difficult for the general public and stakeholders to fully understand.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section provides the short title for the legislation, which is the "Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act."

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides definitions for specific terms used in the Act. “Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition” refers to the land added to the Sarvis Wilderness as per an amendment, and “Secretary” refers to the Secretary of Agriculture.

3. Designation of Sarvis Creek Wilderness addition Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text describes an amendment to the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to include an additional 6,817 acres of land in the Routt National Forest as part of the Sarvis Creek Wilderness. It also specifies that the effective date for managing this wilderness area is the same as the enactment date of this new Act.

4. Administrative provisions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the rights of Indian Tribes under treaties are unaffected by the Act, and the Secretary can allow Tribes access to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition for traditional and cultural activities. Additionally, the Secretary may conduct activities to control fire, insects, and diseases in the area as needed.