Overview
Title
To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to better address certain transactions by foreign entities of concern, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure that when certain businesses from outside the U.S. try to buy big pieces of land or property here, the government takes a closer look to keep everyone safe. If they try to break up their big purchases into smaller pieces to sneak past the rules, this bill aims to stop that.
Summary AI
S. 3948, also known as the "Protecting Against Foreign Adversary Investments Act of 2024," seeks to update the Defense Production Act of 1950 to improve oversight of real estate transactions involving foreign entities of concern in the United States. The bill requires a review of any real estate purchase by these entities if certain financial or acreage thresholds are met and mandates reports on their potential national security threats. Additionally, it calls for the development of best practices to aid state and local officials in assessing national security risks in potential transactions with foreign entities of concern.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Protecting Against Foreign Adversary Investments Act of 2024," aims to amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to enhance the oversight of real estate transactions involving foreign entities considered to pose potential risks to national security. These foreign entities, referred to as "foreign entities of concern," are subject to additional scrutiny by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). The bill outlines new requirements for certain real estate transactions and mandates regular reporting about potential national security risks of these transactions. It also requires the creation of best practices for state and local governments when dealing with such foreign entities.
Significant Issues
One major concern with the bill is its reliance on definitions from external legislation, such as the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act. The lack of clarity in these definitions can lead to confusion and inconsistencies in applying the law, making it difficult for affected parties to understand their obligations. Additionally, the bill sets specific thresholds for transactions that must be reviewed, such as a $1,000,000 value or 100-acre size, which entities could potentially circumvent by structuring deals just below these limits.
The complexity of the language used also raises an issue, as it might be difficult for the general public or smaller business entities to fully comprehend their responsibilities, thereby risking non-compliance due to misunderstandings. The requirement for significant inter-departmental coordination could lead to bureaucratic delays in implementing and assessing these new measures. Moreover, some information in the reports may remain classified, limiting public transparency about foreign entities deemed threats to national security.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, the bill aims to protect national security by closely monitoring foreign investments in critical infrastructure and resources. However, the inherent complexity and potential for ambiguity might complicate understanding and compliance, especially for individuals or businesses engaged in property transactions. The intended heightened scrutiny is designed to safeguard national interests but could also introduce inefficiencies or restrictions that impact the real estate market.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Real estate investors and firms, especially those with international ties, stand to face increased regulatory scrutiny and potential limitations on transactions involving foreign entities. This scrutiny, while aimed at national security protection, could complicate or slow down investment processes, potentially deterring foreign investment. State and local governments might benefit from new guidelines on dealing with foreign investment, helping them better assess national security risks. However, without a mechanism for regularly updating these guidelines, officials might be operating with outdated information as new risks emerge.
In summary, while the bill's aims to protect national security are well-intentioned, several implementation challenges and potential impacts on real estate markets and international relations require consideration. Clarity, transparency, and timely adaptability will be crucial in ensuring its effective application without inadvertently stifling legitimate economic activities.
Financial Assessment
In examining the financial references within the "Protecting Against Foreign Adversary Investments Act of 2024," it is noteworthy that the bill does not directly involve spending or appropriations. Instead, it outlines regulatory measures concerning real estate transactions involving foreign entities.
Financial Thresholds
The bill sets specific criteria for when these transactions are subject to mandatory review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). A transaction involving a foreign entity of concern must be reviewed if it exceeds $1,000,000 in value or if the real estate involved exceeds 100 acres. Additionally, the review requirements kick in if the aggregate value or acreage of transactions by the same entity surpasses these limits within a three-year period. Such thresholds are established to help identify and mitigate potential national security threats arising from foreign investments in U.S. real estate.
Circumvention Risks
A potential issue identified in the bill is the possibility of entities structuring their transactions just below these thresholds to avoid review. For example, a foreign entity could make multiple transactions slightly under $1,000,000 or just below 100 acres to sidestep scrutiny, which could undermine the regulatory intent. This highlights a loophole that might be exploited unless additional measures are considered to address such strategic behavior.
Impact of External Definitions
The bill heavily relies on definitions from external legislation, such as the "William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act," for terms like "foreign entity of concern." This reliance could lead to inconsistencies or confusion if these definitions are not uniformly interpreted, especially as they determine which entities are subject to the financial thresholds mentioned. Any changes or ambiguities in the external legislation could thus affect the financial oversight mechanisms established by this Act.
Reporting and Bureaucratic Efficiency
The bill calls for various reports from the Secretary of the Treasury and other officials to assess the applicability and impact of these financial thresholds and related measures. While these reports are crucial for oversight, they introduce potential bureaucratic inefficiencies or delays. The time and resources required to compile these reports could, indirectly, bear financial implications for the responsible entities. Moreover, the bill's reliance on multiple departments for these reports may further complicate timely implementation.
In summary, while the bill focuses on regulatory oversight rather than direct financial allocations, its financial thresholds and reporting requirements bear significant implications for how foreign real estate transactions are monitored in the U.S. The potential for circumvention of these thresholds and the reliance on external legislative definitions are critical areas of concern that could affect the efficacy of the bill's financial oversight objectives.
Issues
The bill introduces a new review process for real estate purchases by 'foreign entities of concern,' but the criteria for what constitutes a 'foreign entity of concern' and assessing 'threats to national security' are based on external definitions, potentially leading to inconsistency or bias in application (Section 2).
The threshold values for mandatory review of real estate transactions (e.g., $1,000,000 or 100 acres) could allow entities to circumvent the review process by structuring transactions just below these limits, undermining the intended purpose of the regulation (Section 2).
The reliance on external legislation for definitions, such as the 'William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act,' may cause confusion and misinterpretation if these definitions are not easily accessible or clear to those applying the law (Sections 2 and 3).
The heavy legal and technical language used in the bill may prove difficult for the general public or smaller entities to understand, potentially leading to non-compliance due to misunderstanding their obligations (Section 2).
The requirement for reports from multiple Secretaries may lead to bureaucratic delays or inefficiencies, affecting the timely assessment and implementation of the bill's measures (Section 2).
The integration of classified annexes in mandatory reports could reduce public transparency and accountability about which foreign entities present a threat to national security (Section 3).
The bill does not contain mechanisms for updating best practices based on new risks or threats, which could result in outdated guidance for state and local officials (Section 4).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that it will be known as the “Protecting Against Foreign Adversary Investments Act of 2024”.
2. Authority of Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to review certain real estate purchases by foreign entities of concern Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section proposes amendments to the Defense Production Act of 1950 to allow the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to review certain real estate transactions by foreign entities that could affect national security. It defines "foreign entity of concern" and mandates that significant real estate transactions involving these entities must be declared, while also requiring reports from the Treasury and other departments on the feasibility of enacting retroactive measures and any needed changes to support these amendments.
Money References
- (a) In general.—Section 721(a)(4) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(a)(4)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) in clause (i), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon; (B) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and (C) by adding at the end the following new clause: “(iii) any transaction described in subparagraph (B)(vi) proposed or pending on or after the date of the enactment of this clause.”; (2) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end the following new clause: “(vi) Subject to subparagraph (C), the purchase or lease by, or a concession to, a foreign entity of concern of private or public real estate in the United States if— “(I) the value or fair market value of such purchase, lease, or concession exceeds $1,000,000; “(II) the real estate exceeds 100 acres; “(III) the aggregate value or fair market value of such purchase, lease, or concession, in combination with the value or fair market value of other purchases or leases by, or concessions to, such foreign entity during the 3-year period preceding the date of such purchase, lease, or concession, exceeds $1,000,000; “(IV) the aggregate acreage of such purchase, lease, or concession, in combination with the aggregate acreage of other purchases or leases by, or concessions to, such foreign entity during the 3-year period preceding the date of such purchase, lease, or concession, exceeds 100 acres; or “(V) the structure of such purchase, lease, or concession is designed or intended to evade or circumvent the application of this clause, as determined by the Committee.”; and (3) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking “subparagraph (B)(ii)” and inserting “clause (ii) or (iv) of subparagraph (B)”.
3. Report on public or private real estate purchasing activities in the United States by foreign entities of concern Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section requires the Director of National Intelligence, along with other federal agencies, to provide annual reports to Congress about national security risks related to real estate in the U.S. owned or leased by foreign entities of concern. These reports will analyze potential threats to national security, including industrial espionage and threats to critical infrastructure, and must be made publicly available.
4. Best practices for State and local officials relating to potential transactions with foreign entities of concern Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that within 180 days of the law's enactment, the Director of National Intelligence, in collaboration with other federal officials, must create and distribute best practices for state and local officials to follow when considering transactions with foreign entities of concern. These guidelines will highlight common risks and provide information on federal resources to assess national security risks associated with such transactions.