Overview

Title

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a demonstration project to increase access to biosimilar biological products under the Medicare program.

ELI5 AI

S. 3934 is a plan to try using special versions of medicines called biosimilars in Medicare, where doctors can earn extra money if they choose these medicines, but it won't cost patients more. The project will happen over three years, and it will help decide if using these medicines can keep costs the same while making sure people get good care.

Summary AI

S. 3934 proposes the creation of a three-year nationwide project led by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to boost access to biosimilar biological products under Medicare. This demonstration project would evaluate the benefits of a shared savings payment plan for these products, encouraging providers to use biosimilar options by potentially offering additional payments without increasing patient costs. The project requires voluntary participation from eligible healthcare providers, with an emphasis on keeping overall Medicare expenses unchanged. The bill also extends certain payment increases for biosimilar products under Medicare until 2032.

Published

2024-03-14
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-03-14
Package ID: BILLS-118s3934is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,271
Pages:
7
Sentences:
38

Language

Nouns: 400
Verbs: 95
Adjectives: 83
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 63
Entities: 77

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.78
Average Sentence Length:
33.45
Token Entropy:
4.96
Readability (ARI):
21.62

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "Increasing Access to Biosimilars Act of 2023" proposes to establish a demonstration project aimed at enhancing access to biosimilar biological products under Medicare Part B. It mandates the Secretary of Health and Human Services to initiate a three-year nationwide demonstration project. This initiative is designed to evaluate the benefits of offering shared savings payments for biosimilars, which are essentially generic versions of biologic drugs. The goal is to determine if these payments could help reduce costs without raising expenses for Medicare beneficiaries or the program itself. Additionally, the bill extends eligibility for certain payment increases for biosimilars under the Medicare program from 2027 to 2032.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the significant issues with the bill is the vague language regarding the "shared savings payment" in Section 2, subsection (a). The broad wording could lead to varied interpretations, resulting in different calculations or distributions of benefits and savings among providers. Another concern is the method for selecting participating providers, outlined in Section 2, subsection (b)(2), which lacks transparency and clear criteria, potentially leading to perceptions of favoritism.

Section 2, subsection (d)(1) does not define how "costs to the provider" are calculated, which could result in disputes about how additional payments should be computed. The requirement for certification from the Chief Actuary, as stated in Section 2, subsection (f), lacks specific criteria, raising concerns about the project's financial impacts on Medicare expenditures.

Moreover, the bill's extension of eligibility for payment increases from 2027 to 2032, outlined in Section 3, is not supported by any clear justification, making it unclear why this change is necessary and raising concerns about prolonged spending under Medicare.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, particularly Medicare beneficiaries, this bill could lead to increased access to more affordable biosimilar drugs, potentially reducing overall medication costs. If the demonstration project successfully shows cost savings without increased expenses, it could result in lower premiums or reduced out-of-pocket costs for consumers.

However, if the bill's implementation leads to increased Medicare spending due to unclear savings calculations or mismanagement, the financial burden could indirectly fall on taxpayers or result in reduced funding for other essential Medicare services.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies could experience varied impacts. Participating providers might benefit from additional payments without increasing the cost-sharing burden on patients, encouraging the use of cost-effective biosimilars. However, the lack of clear selection criteria may disadvantage certain providers, leading to perceptions of unfair treatment.

For pharmaceutical companies, the extended eligibility for payment increases could incentivize the production and distribution of biosimilars, promoting competition and innovation in the drug market. Conversely, companies producing reference biologic drugs might face increased competition, potentially affecting their market share and profits.

Overall, while the bill aims to enhance access to essential medicines and potentially reduce costs, its success largely depends on the clarity and fairness of implementation processes, impacting how various stakeholders perceive and respond to the bill's provisions.

Issues

  • The demonstration project's shared savings payment language in Section 2, subsection (a), is broad and could lead to varying interpretations on how benefits and savings are calculated or distributed, which could have significant financial and operational implications for providers.

  • Section 2, subsection (b)(2) allows for the Secretary to select participating providers without clear criteria, raising concerns about transparency and potential favoritism in provider selection.

  • In Section 2, subsection (d)(1), the method for calculating 'costs to the provider' is undefined, creating potential for ambiguity and disputes about additional payment calculations.

  • The assurance in Section 2, subsection (f) that there will be no increase in Medicare expenditures is based on certification from the Chief Actuary, but lacks specific criteria for this certification, raising questions about the project's financial impact.

  • Section 3 extends the eligibility for payment increases for biosimilar biological products under Medicare from 2027 to 2032 without providing justification or context, leading to concerns about prolonged increased spending under Medicare and the potential for preferential treatment of certain manufacturers.

  • The waiver authority in Section 2, subsection (e), grants substantial leeway to the Secretary to waive requirements, which could lead to unintended consequences and lack of accountability if not carefully managed.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states that it can be referred to as the “Increasing Access to Biosimilars Act of 2023.”

2. Demonstration project to increase access to biosimilar biological products under the Medicare program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes a 3-year demonstration project by the Secretary of Health and Human Services aimed at evaluating the effects of shared savings payments for biosimilar biological products under Medicare Part B. Participation is voluntary, and the goal is to determine if these payments can reduce costs without increasing expenses for Medicare beneficiaries or the program itself.

3. Extending eligibility for certain payment increases for biosimilar biological products under the Medicare program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section changes a part of the Social Security Act to extend eligibility for certain payment increases for biosimilar biological products under the Medicare program, moving the cutoff date from 2027 to 2032.