Overview

Title

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the methods by which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs conducts oversight of certain educational institutions, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to make sure schools do a better job reporting problems to the people in charge of helping veterans with their education. It also wants to create a special list to check how well these schools are doing within a set time.

Summary AI

S. 3911 aims to strengthen the oversight of educational institutions by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The bill mandates that these institutions promptly report certain actions or events to the State approving agency or the Secretary. It introduces additional reporting requirements for both accredited and nonaccredited courses. Additionally, it sets a deadline for the creation of a database for risk-based surveys to be established by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs within 180 days of the bill's enactment.

Published

2024-03-12
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-03-12
Package ID: BILLS-118s3911is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
707
Pages:
4
Sentences:
16

Language

Nouns: 171
Verbs: 54
Adjectives: 36
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 51
Entities: 41

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.99
Average Sentence Length:
44.19
Token Entropy:
4.62
Readability (ARI):
22.61

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "Isakson-Roe Education Oversight Expansion Act" aims to enhance the oversight conducted by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on educational institutions. It proposes amendments to Title 38 of the United States Code. The legislation applies additional requirements for institutions receiving VA approval by mandating timely notifications of significant changes. The bill also addresses the administration of nonaccredited courses and stipulates a deadline for establishing a necessary database to support risk-based surveys.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several key issues emerge from the bill's provisions:

  1. Administrative Burden: The requirement for educational institutions to notify state agencies within 30 days of specific actions or events could impose significant administrative demands, particularly on smaller institutions.

  2. Database Implementation Timeframe: The bill sets a timeline of 180 days to create a risk-based surveys database, which may be insufficient for developing an effective tool.

  3. Complex Amendments: The amendments to existing sections might make it challenging to track and comprehend the changes without consulting multiple legal texts.

  4. Ambiguity and Subjectivity: There is potential ambiguity in defining what actions or events require notification, and subjective decision-making in determining the appropriate notification criteria could lead to inconsistency.

Impact on the Public

For the public, especially veterans pursuing education, the bill could provide an added layer of protection by ensuring educational institutions are under increased scrutiny. By mandating quick updates on significant changes, the bill aims to assure that veterans are informed about essential matters that might affect their educational choices and benefits.

However, if institutions struggle to comply with these requirements, it might inadvertently lead to fewer educational options for veterans. Institutions overwhelmed by administrative demands might reconsider participating in VA educational programs.

Impact on Stakeholders

Veterans: The primary stakeholders who are likely to benefit from the bill's intention to ensure transparency and accountability in educational institutions. With rigorous oversight, veterans can have greater confidence in the educational services they receive.

Educational Institutions: The bill places significant obligations on institutions, particularly smaller ones with limited administrative capabilities. These institutions might find the reporting requirements burdensome and costly, which could impact their ability to provide educational opportunities to veterans.

State Approving Agencies and the VA: These entities will likely face increased workloads due to the additional oversight and database management responsibilities. Successfully implementing these measures will require appropriate resources and coordination.

In summary, while the "Isakson-Roe Education Oversight Expansion Act" aims to protect veterans by enhancing control over educational institutions, its implementation poses several challenges. Balancing the administrative demands on institutions with efficient oversight is crucial to adequately support veterans in their educational pursuits.

Issues

  • The requirement for educational institutions to notify the State approving agency within 30 days of certain actions or events (as described in Section 3673(e)(3) of title 38) could impose a substantial administrative burden, especially on smaller institutions, potentially impacting their operations. This issue is relevant to Section 2(a) and Section 2(b).

  • The deadline for establishing the risk-based surveys database is set for 180 days after the enactment of the Act, which might not provide sufficient time for development and implementation, potentially compromising its effectiveness. This issue is relevant to Section 2(d).

  • The bill introduces amendments to existing legal sections, which could cause confusion and complicate tracking changes. Understanding the overall implications may require extensive cross-referencing. This issue is relevant across multiple sub-sections within Section 2.

  • The requirement for submitting notifications to the State approving agency or the Secretary when acting in such a role, based on the subjective determination of 'appropriate' form and information by the Secretary, may introduce a lack of standardized criteria and subjective decision-making. This issue is discussed in Section 2(a) and Section 2(b).

  • The actions or events that trigger the notification requirement are not clearly defined within the provided text ('action or event described in section 3673(e)(3) of this title'), potentially leading to ambiguity and inconsistent application. This issue is specifically referenced in Sections 2(a) and 2(b).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the "Isakson-Roe Education Oversight Expansion Act" to be used as a short title for the Act, meaning this name can be used as a simple reference to the full Act in discussions or legal documents.

2. Expansion of Department of Veterans Affairs oversight of certain educational institutions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill proposes that educational institutions receiving approval from the Department of Veterans Affairs must notify the appropriate state agency or Secretary of any significant changes within 30 days, adds notification requirements for nonaccredited courses, makes related amendments for consistency, adds new reasons for suspending approval if notifications aren't made, and establishes a deadline for creating a database required by the Department.